Showing posts with label Suo Motu Case. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Suo Motu Case. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 23, 2021

Suo- Motu Vs. The Commissioner NDMC & 3 Others | Case No.2142/1011/2021/03/547-551 | Dated:23/06/2021

 In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25-D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-110002
Phone: 011-23216003-04,  Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No.2142/1011/2021/03/547-551         Dated:23/06/2021

In the matter of:

Suo-motu
                           
Versus

The Commissioner
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
4th Floor, Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre
JLN Marg, New Delhi -110002                     ..............Respondent No.1
         
The Commissioner
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
9th Floor, Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre
JLN Marg, New Delhi -110002                             ...............Respondent No.2
    
The Commissioner
East Delhi Municipal Corporation
419, Udyog Sadan, Patparganj
Industrial Area
Delhi -110096                                                              ...............Respondent No.3

The Chairman   
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
FC-18, Institutional Area, Karkardooma
Delhi-110092                       ...............Respondent No.4

Date of Hearing: 23.06.2021


Present: Sh. M. Mandal, Additional Director (Education), SDMC and 
Sh. Rishi Pal Rana, Deputy Director(Education) SDMC, on behalf of Respondent No.2
Sh. Biju Raj, Deputy Secretary, DSSSB and Sh. R.P. Singh, Section Officer, DSSSB for Respondent No.4

Sh. Parmesh Kumar F/o Sh. Mohak Kumar alongwith
Sh. Rajan Mani (Adv.)

ORDER

A Suo-Motu cognizance regarding non providing of reservation to persons with benchmark disabilities as per the latest notification dated 04.01.2021 issued by Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt. of India for the post of Special Educator (Primary) (post code  32/20), advertised by DSSSB vide advertisement dated 04.03.2021, was taken up  with the  respondents vide  notice dated 12.03.2021.  

2. Upon considering the response of the respondents and rejoinder dated 06.06.2021 of complainant, a hearing was scheduled on 23.06.2021 at 1200 hrs. 

3. SDMC represented the three Municipal Corporations as it takes care the recruitment process for all the three Municipal Corporations.  SDMC contended that as these were all backlog vacancies, the latest notification dated 04.01.2021 issued by Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India may not apply for these posts.

4. It was clarified and ruled that though these are backlog vacancies but are being filled now i.e. since PwD Act has come into effect w.e.f. 19.04.2017, these vacancies ought to be considered for all categories of persons with disabilities.

5. The post of Special Educator (Primary) is deemed to be identified for Intellectual Disability also.

6. After detailed hearing of all parties, it was agreed upon that a corrigendum be issued by SDMC/DSSSB with respect to opening of this advertisement for a period of 10-12 days as per norms and regulations existing on such issues to facilitate all categories of persons with disabilities identified for this post which were erroneously left out by the user department.

7. It is also recommended that DSSSB, SDMC and all other Government Departments should maintain system of roster with respect to all categories of posts of persons with disabilities.

8. The case was disposed with the above recommendations. 

9. This court be informed of the action taken on the above recommendations.  

10. Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 23rd day of June, 2021. 


(Ranjan Mukherjee)
                                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Copy to : Sh. Mohak S/o Sh. Parmesh Kumar, 173, Nehru Apartments, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 with reference to his e-mail dated 17.05.2021.


Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Suo Motu Verus Joint Secretary & Chief Administrative Officer, Min. of Defence, Govt of India & Chairman, NDMC | Case No. 908/1108/2019/05/9203-9204 | Dated 31.12.2019


Synopisis

In the instant case, certain accessibility deficiencies in the National War Memorial at India Gate, New Delhi built by the Ministry of Defence and inaugurated by the Hon'ble Prime Minister in Feb 2019 were brought to the notice of the Court in form of an email attaching a detailed report of an access audit conducted by Shri Subhash Chandra Vashishth of the memorial. It was also shared that Mr. Vashishth had been following up with the concerned Senior Officials of the National War Memorial, however, they were reluctant to undertake any improvements and were not responding to the audit recommendations.

This Court took up the matter Suo Motu with the Joint Secretary & Chief Administrative Officer, Min. of Defence, Govt of India & Chairman, New Delhi Municipal Council under whose jurisdiction the memorial has been built and registered as Case No. 908/1108/2019/05/9203-9204 | Dated 31.12.2019.

Mr. Vashishth was requested to be amicus curiae in the matter to assist the court as an expert and Court also roped in expert from the visually impaired sector for necessary guidance to the respondents to make the National War Memorial Accessible in light of Section 44 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.  

In due course, the Defence ministry worked out a plan of action in consultation with the accessibility experts and prepared short term, mid term and long term goals to gradually achieve accessibility at the Memorial.



Thursday, March 7, 2019

Suo Motu Vs. Commissioner, Deptt of Trade & Taxes | Case No. 716/1011/2019/02/1134-1135 | Dated: 06.03.2019



In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 716/1011/2019/02/1134-1135                       Dated: 06.03.2019

In the matter of:

Suo Motu
    
Versus
The Commissioner,
Department of Trade & Taxes
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
3rd Floor, Vyapar Bhawan
IP Estate
New Delhi-110002.                                                        ...…Respondent


Date of hearing:        01.03.2019

Present: Sh. Amiya Kumar Shukla, GSTO (HR) alongwith Sh. B. Chander, ASO for respondent.
   
ORDER
Dr. Ram Kishan, a person with locomotor disability vide his email dated 30.01.2019 submitted that Department of Trade & Taxes under Govt. of NCT of Delhi has invited applications for Data Entry Operator (DEO) on contract basis.  However, reservation for persons with disabilities in the said recruitment has not been provided.
2.       The matter was taken up with the respondent vide show cause-cum-hearing notice dated 05.02.2019 under the Provisions of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’.
3.       Department of Trade & Taxes, Human Resource Branch vide letter dated 18.02.2019 submitted as under:
“1)       This department does not recruit DEOs directly; instead they are outsourced through some Private Agency selected through GEM (Govt. e-Marketplace) Portal.
2)         Currently, the DEOs are being outsourced through GA Digital Web word Pvt. Ltd. Company through Gem Portal after observing all codal formalities as per GFR. Previously DEOs had been outsourced through ICSIL company.
3)         List of candidates who are registered with them is forwarded by the company after verifying their educational certificates, ID Proofs and character antecedents etc. based on the educational and other requirements provide by the department.
4)         Thereafter a typing test of these candidates is conducted in the Computer Lab of this department wherein typing speed of 30 wpm has been set as criteria for selection of eligible candidates.  They are deployed in this department according to Merit list.  The current duration of the contact is 1.2.19 to 30.11.19.”
4.       During the hearing on 01.03.2019, the representatives of the Department clarified that 131 posts of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) are vacant in the Department.  The recruitment to the post of LDC is made by the Services Department through DSSSB.  Due to unavailability of LDCs and with the approval of Services Department, DEOs are being appointed on outsourced basis.  As the Department does not directly recruit reservation is not being provided.  They also clarified that DEOs’ appointments are initially for 10 months which may be extended.  The agency through which the DEOs are recruited, may change.
5.       From the submissions of the respondent Department, it is seen that the appointments of DEOs through outsourced agency are being made against the vacancies in the sanctioned posts.  Had these posts been filled through DSSSB, reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities would have been made.  Merely because the nature of appointment and the agency through which the candidates are recruited, are different from the usual ones, persons with benchmark disabilities cannot be denied their right to reservation as provided under Section 34 of the Act which is reproduced below:
“34. Reservation.—(1) Every appropriate Government shall appoint in every Government establishment, not less than four per cent of the total number of vacancies in the cadre strength in each group of posts meant to be filled with persons with benchmark disabilities of which, one per cent. each shall be reserved for persons with benchmark disabilities under clauses (a), (b) and (c) and one per cent for persons with benchmark disabilities under clauses (d) and (e), namely:—
(a)       blindness and low vision;
(b)       deaf and hard of hearing;
(c)        locomotor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured, dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy;
(d)       autism, intellectual disability, specific learning disability and mental illness;
(e)       multiple disabilities from amongst persons under clauses (a) to (d) including deaf-blindness in the posts identified for each disabilities:
Provided that the reservation in promotion shall be in accordance with such instructions as are issued by the appropriate Government from time to time:
Provided further that the appropriate Government, in consultation with the Chief Commissioner or the State Commissioner, as the case may be, may, having regard to the type of work carried out in any Government establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in such notifications exempt any Government establishment from the provisions of this section.
(2)       Where in any recruitment year any vacancy cannot be filled up due to non-availability of a suitable person with benchmark disability or for any other sufficient reasons, such vacancy shall be carried forward in the succeeding recruitment year and if in the succeeding recruitment year also suitable person with benchmark disability is not available, it may first be filled by interchange among the five categories and only when there is no person with disability available for the post in that year, the employer shall fill up the vacancy by appointment of a person, other than a person with disability:
Provided that if the nature of vacancies in an establishment is such that a given category of person cannot be employed, the vacancies may be interchanged among the five categories with the prior approval of the appropriate Government.
(3)       The appropriate Government may, by notification, provide for such relaxation of upper age limit for employment of persons with benchmark disability, as it thinks fit.”

6.       Ministry of Home Affair’s O.M. No. 27/4/67(II)-Estt.(SCT) dated 24.09.1968 which is reproduced below also provides that reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be made in all temporary appointments except appointments which are to last for less than 45 days:
“Ministry of Home Affairs O.M. No.27/4/67(II)-Estt.(SCT),
dated the 24th September, 1968, to all Ministries/Departments, etc.

Subject:-Recommendation No. 18 of the Working Group to study the progress of measures for land allotment to Scheduled Castes and their representation in services-Reservation in temporary appointments.
The Working Group under the Chairmanship of Shri M.R. Yardi, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs to study the progress of measures for land allotment to Scheduled Castes and their representation in services has inter-alia made the following recommendation:-
Recommendation No. 18
“Rules of reservations should also be extended to purely temporary posts.  This would give an opportunity to Scheduled Castes applicants appointed against short term vacancies to gain experience which will facilitate their absorption later in regular vacancies.”
2.         Accordingly to existing orders, reservations are made for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in all temporary appointments except those which are to last for less than 3 months.  The recommendation of the Working Group has been considered and it has been decided that the aforesaid reservation orders should in future apply to all temporary appointments which are to last 45 days or more.  Accordingly, with effect from the date of issue of this O.M., reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be made in all temporary appointments except appointments which are to last for less than 45 days.
3.         Ministry of Finance etc. are requested to bring these instructions to the notice of all authorities under them.
4.         This issues with the concurrence of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in so far as persons serving under him are concerned.”
7.       A plain reading of Section 34 of the Act indicates that reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities is not linked to long term, short term or regular appointment.  The only condition is that the provision of the said reservation would not be applicable to appointments made by promotion. The manner and the agency through which such appointments are made to fill the vacancies in the posts are not relevant.
8.       One of the objectives of making a provision for reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities is to economically empower them and to ensure that they lead a life of dignity on equal basis with others.  It is implicit in the provision under Section 34 of the Act that they get their share in the employment opportunities/appointments that are available to other members of public. Therefore, irrespective of whether the appointments are made on long term, short term, regular or by whatever nomenclature these are referred to, the quota that has been earmarked for persons with benchmark disabilities in the statute, must be provided to them.  Therefore, every Govt. establishment is mandated under Section 34 of the Act to reserve not less than 4% vacancies for persons with benchmark disabilities against the appointments made by them in the posts in that establishment.  For the purpose of computing the reserved vacancies for persons with benchmark disabilities, a running roster as prescribed by DoPT in their OM no. No. 36035/02/2017-Estt. (Res) dated 15.01.1998, should be used. 
9.       In view of the above, the respondent should place the demand accordingly with the recruiting agency/ supplier of DEOs and ensure that the prescribed percentage of vacancies are reserved and filled up by persons with benchmark disabilities as mandated in Section 34 of the Act.
10.     As appointments on short term basis/on contract/outsourced basis are being made in various Departments against the sanctioned posts, a copy of this order is being marked to Secretary, Services Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi with the request to issue appropriate instructions to all the concerned for reservation of vacancies for persons with benchmark disabilities against all the appointments made in the sanctioned posts for a period of 45 days or more.
11.     Action taken report on the above mentioned recommendations be submitted to this Court within three months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.
12.     The complaint is disposed off.
13.     Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 06th day of March, 2019.     




           (T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities

Copy to :
Secretary, Services Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 7th Level, B-Wing, Delhi Secretariat, I. P. Estate, New Delhi-110002 (email: secservices@nic.in) for information and necessary action on para 10 of the order.

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Suo-Motu Vs. Secretary, Deptt of Social Welfare | Case No. 672/1011/2019/01/830 | Dated: 13.02.2019



In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 672/1011/2019/01/830                             Dated: 13.02.2019

In the matter of:

SUO-MOTU                                                         

                                      Versus                 
The Secretary,
Department of Social Welfare,
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Delhi Gate, New Delhi-110002.                                        ...........Respondent


Date of Hearing :   07.02.2019

Present:                Sh. Bhagwan, S.O., Sh. Mahesh Kumar, ASO, Sh. Vikas Kumar, ASO on behalf of respondent.

ORDER

Department of Personnel & Training vide OM no. 30612/39/2014-Estt.(Res.) dated 22-25th May, 2015 had launched special Recruitment Drive for filling up unfilled vacancies reserved for persons with disabilities.  In light of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s Interim Order dated 28.04.2015 in Contempt Petition No. 499/2014 in Civil Appeal No. 9096/2013 in the matter of National Federation of Blind, it was also observed that the information provided by various departments and sent to MHA was not correct and the details were not as per the proforma. This court therefore took up with the Pr. Secretaries/ Secretaries/ Spl. Secretaries/ Addl. Secretaries/ HODs of all the Departments of GNCT of Delhi for obtaining the details of appointments made by the concerned Departments and the establishments under their control as on 25.02.2016 in the prescribed format (copy enclosed) vide letter No. 5/1593/2017/Wel/CD/155-316 dated 05.05.2017. The information was to be submitted by 31.05.2017.

2.       Suo motu cases have been registered against the Departments who did not submit the information despite reminders including the Department of Social Welfare under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’.  A show cause-cum-hearing notice dated 11.01.2019 was issued to Social Welfare Department with the direction to depute the concerned officers alongwith vacancy based reservation roster for persons with disabilities on 10.01.2019 for perusal so that the backlog of reserved vacancies, if any, is filled up by conducting special recruitment drive.  None appeared on 10.01.2019 and on the next date of hearing on 15.01.2019, it was submitted that the information regarding appointment of persons with disabilities since 1996 has been collected and would be submitted in a week’s time as the officers and staff were busy in the recruitment of teachers.          Sh. S. Kulshreshtha, S.O. and Sh. Mahesh Kumar, ASO were explained the provisions of the Act and the procedure prescribed by Department of Personnel and Training for computing the reserved vacancies for persons with disabilities and maintaining 100-Point vacancy based reservation roster.

3.       On the next date of hearing on 07.02.2019, Sh. Bhagwan, S.O., Sh. Mahesh Kumar, ASO, and Sh. Vikas Kumar, ASO have produced the details of information with regard to the vacancies filled in Group ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ posts by direct recruitment.  As per the details submitted, there has not been any recruitment to Group ‘A’ posts since 1996.  Hence no backlog.  In Group ‘B’ posts, 88 vacancies were filled and 2 persons with locomotor disabilities (OH), 3 VI and nil hearing impaired (HI) were appointed. Hence there is 1 backlog of HI as there is no record whether the advertisements mentioned about reservation of vacancies/carry forward/interchange with other categories of disabilities.  In Group ‘C’ posts, 82 vacancies were filled.  Out of them 8 persons with locomotor disability were appointed, but no person with blindness/ low vision (VI) and HI was appointed.  There is no record whether any vacancy was reserved for VI and HI.  As per the Department, there is backlog of 1 vacancy each for B/LV and HI. 

4.       The information in respect of promotion within Group ‘C’ posts has not been provided.  It may be recalled that while considering the complaint of Sh. Ashwani Gupta for promotion to the post of Housefather against reserved vacancy for persons with disabilities, it was found that reservation was not provided while making promotion in Group ‘C’ posts.  Therefore, in all likelihood there may be backlog of reserved vacancies in promotion to Group ‘C’ posts.  While the Department should submit the information pertaining to the appointments made in Group ‘C’ posts and the backlog, if any, it is considered expedient to dispose of this case so that backlog reserved vacancies in Group ‘B’ and Group ‘C’ posts by direct recruitment are filled up by conducting Special Recruitment Drive without losing any further time.

5.       Accordingly, based on the information so far submitted by the Department, the following recommendations are made;
(i)      initiate action to fill up the backlog of a vacancy in Group ‘B’ posts by a person with hearing impairment and one vacancy each in Group ‘C’ posts by a person with blindness/ low vision and person with hearing impairment by conducting Special Recruitment Drive or in a regular recruitment exercise within one month from the date of receipt of this order.
(ii)      submit the status of backlog of reserved vacancies by promotion within Group ’C’ posts and the 100-point vacancy based reservation roster for posts filled by promotion and for direcrt recruitment in Group ‘A’ , Group ‘B’ and Group ‘C’ posts which should be prepared in accordance with DOPT’s instructions within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The proposal to fill up the backlog of reserved vacancies, if any, should also be indicated.

6.           The case is disposed off.
7.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 13th day of February, 2019.
                                                             
(T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
         





Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Suo-Motu Vs. Dte of Education & Hazari Lal Public School | Case No. 673/1032/2019/01/797-98 | Dated: 12.02.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 673/1032/2019/01/797-98                        Dated: 12.02.2019

In the matter of:

Suo-Motu
                                
Versus
The Director
 Directorate of Education, GNCTD
Old Secretariat Building, Civil Lines,
Delhi110054.                                                         Respondent No. 1

The Principal,
Hazari Lal Public School,
Siraspur Road, Khera Kalan,
Delhi-110082.                                                        Respondent No. 2

Date of hearing: 11.02.2019

Present:       Sh. D.K. Tyagi, DDE Zone 10, Sh. Kapil Kumar, Sr. Assistant, Sh. Ganesh Prasad, DDE (IEB), Sh. Vinay Bir Singh, OSD and Dr. Mukesh Chand, OSD (IEB) for Respondent No. 1.
Ms. Kavita Rana, Vice Principal and Ms. Jyoti Rana, Admission Incharge for Respondent no. 2.

ORDER
Based on news items published in Indian Express on 03.01.2019 and Hindustan Times on 15.01.2019 that the parents of a six year old boy with deafness did not admit him in Hazari Lal Public School, Siraspur Road, Khera Kalan, Delhi allotted to him by Directorate of Education as the school was not equipped to cater his needs, a suo-moto case was registered under Section 80 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereafter referred to us the ‘Act’ and taken up with the respondents vide show cause-cum-hearing notice dated 10.01.2019. A hearing was scheduled on 11.02.2019. 
2.       Ms Kavita, vice Principal, Hazari Lal Public School vide her reply dated 02.02.2019 submitted that Master Lalit Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Kumar, a child with special need was allotted to the school.  Neither the child nor his parents visited or reported to the school for admission and hence he was mentioned “not reported” in the Directorate of Education’s portal.  The child/parent also did not report to any staff member of the school nor was there any entry in the Visiting Register.  It has also been stated that the school is well versed with various facilities and has a Special Educator as per the directions of the CBSE and Directorate of Education.   The question of denying admission to child did not arise.  Deputy Director, Directorate of Education, North-West A, vide reply dated 01.02.2019 has also reiterated the version of respondent no. 2. 
3.       During the hearing, the representatives of the school added that they tried to locate the child and found that he lives in the Sector 18, Rohini.  However, the parents did not seem interested in admitting the child in their school which is in a village catering to the children belonging to lower income group. 
4.       Sh. Ganesh Prasad, DDE (IEB) and Dr. Mukesh Chand, OSD (IEB) stated that the parents of the child have also filed a petition in the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, which is pending. Directorate of Education through its District Coordinator met the parents and informed them about the availability of Special Educator in the school and also the transport allowance for a period of 10 months to be paid to the children with disabilities, if admitted in a school.  They were also informed that sign language Interpreter would also be deputed, if required and that arrangement for cochlear implantation is also being made. However, the parents have not admitted the child in the school. 
5.       Since the matter is pending before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the case in this Court is closed.
6.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 11th day of February, 2018.      


           (T.D. Dhariyal)
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities