Saturday, June 29, 2019

Radhey Shyam Nishad Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. | Case No. 754/1083/2019/02/3136-3138 | Dated:28.06.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 754/1083/2019/02/3136-3138                          Dated:28.06.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Radhey Shyam Nishad
Dukh Haran House No. B-151,
Balbir Vihar, Kirari, Suleman Nagar,
Sultanpuri, C-Block, North West Delhi,
Delhi-110086.                                                             …….Complainant

                                          Versus                           
The Commissioner,
North Delhi Municipal Corporation,
Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre, Minto Road,
New Delhi-110002.                                            ……...…Respondent no. 1
(Kind Attnt: Ms. Veditha Reddy, Dy. Commissioner
Smt. Raj Rani, Addl. Dy. Commissioner)

The Deputy Commissioner of Police
(Outer Distrcit)
Guru Hari kishan Marg,
Maulana Azad Society,
Pushpanjali Enclave, Pitampur,
Delhi-110034.                                                    ….…….Respondent no. 2

Date of Order:      26.06.2019

Present:     Sh. Radhey Shyam Nishad, complainant in person.
Smt. Raj Rani, Addl. Dy. Commissioner, Rohini Zone alongwith Sh. Sushil Kumar, Zonal Supdt. For Respondent no. 1
                   Sh. Baljit Singh, ASI No. 286/00 for respondent no. 2.
           
ORDER
The above named complainant, a person with 100% visual impairment vide his complaint dated 14.02.2019 submitted that he was residing in his khoka in front of ward no. 45 near Sultan Puri Bus Terminal, New Delhi-86.  He used to sleep in the same khoka and earn his livelihood and was also studying.  The personnel from the PCR Van used to make in appropriate comments on him and a security guard set up a tea shop near his khokha with the intention to get his khoka removed.  Thereafter, some persons from MCD came and took away his khoka in which his books, reading/recording devices, clothes etc. were kept.  The books and the reading devices were issued by the University and until these are returned, the University would not declare his result.  He therefore, requested that his Khoka and articles should be returned to him and arrangement for his stay should also be made. 
2.       The complaint was taken up with the respondents under the provisions of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as “Act” vide letter dated 28.02.2019 followed by reminder dated 13.03.2019.  DCP North West District forwarded the complaint to DCP (Outer District).  As there was no response from respondents, a hearing was scheduled on 26.06.2019 vide summon dated 27.05.2019.
3.       Smt. Raj Rani, Addl. Dy. Commissioner, Rohini Zone who appeared alongwith Sh. Sushil Kumar, Zonal Superintendent submitted a reply dated 25.06.2019 which states that a complaint dated 17-12-2018 was received from Sh. Sumit Tomar vide which he had alleged that some anti-social elements had setup khokas near Sultan Puri Bus stand.  Those khokas were operated on the name of persons with disabilities by some persons without disabilities. Sh. Tomar also submitted the same complaint during the meeting of the SDM (Kanjhawala), wherein the SDM also directed the staff of the North DMC to take action against illegal khokas.    Thereafter, the staff of the Licensing Department and Maintenance Department of the Rohini Zone, North DMC alongwith staff of Delhi Police (PS-Sultan Puri) taken action against such illegal khokas on 15-01-2019. During the action, 06 no. of illegal khokas were impounded and were deposited in the Zonal Store. 04 khokas were released after receipt of fine from the defaulters. The photos taken during the action were also enclosed with the reply.
4.       Smt. Raj Rani also informed that khoka can be returned only after payment of penalty and as the complainant is not having any license, he should apply for the same with TVC.   
5.       After hearing the parties, it is observed that the only source of livelihood of the complainant has been lost and his studies disrupted.  He has no support whatsoever in Delhi except disability pension of Rs. 2,500/- per month.  He has no savings to pay the penalty which is estimated to be more than Rs. 22,000/- and get his Khokha released.  In view of the fact that the complainant had submitted the complainant on 14.02.2019 and has been pleading to release his khoka ever since, the penalty charges should be waived and his khoka alongwith his belongings should be returned to him with the minimum possible fine not exceeding Rs. 2,000/- and a report be submitted within 15 days of receipt of this order.
6.       The complainant is advised to apply for license for tehbajari/khoka after first July 2019 and Sh. Sushil Kumar will extend necessary assistance in this regard.
7.       The complaint is disposed of.  
8.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 28th day of June, 2019.  
     

                                                                           (T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Thursday, June 27, 2019

Arvind Sharma Vs. Dte of Education & Anr. | Case No. 840/1024/2019/04 /3078-3080 | Dated:26.06.2019




In the Court of the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 840/1024/2019/04 /3078-3080                   Dated:26.06.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Arvind Sharma
Vice Principal (Rtrd.)
Residence-1/7133, Shivaji Park
Shahdara, Delhi-110032
Mobile No. 9911184413                                             
............Petitioner
                                                      Versus
The Director (Education),
Directorate of Education, GNCTD
Old Secretariate,
Delhi-110054                                                         ......Respondent No. 1

The Deputy Director of Education (North-East),
B-Block, Yamuna Vihar,
Delhi-110053                                                         ......Respondent No. 2

Date of Hearing: 25.06.2019
  Present:             Sh. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Complainant
Sh. Satpal Singh, DDE (NE) alongwith Mukul Manrai, ADE (NE) on behalf of Respondent
Dr. Sudhakar Gaikwad, Principal, Sh. Sushil Kumar Rai, TGT (Math) and Sh. Kartar Singh, Ministral Staff, GSBV, Khajoori Khas on behalf of Respondent

ORDER

The above named complainant, a person with 66% locomotor disability vide his email dated 03.04.2019 registered as a complaint under the Rights for Persons with Disability Act, 2016 hereinafter referred to as the Act, inter-alia alleged that he retired from service on 31.12.2018 on attaining the age of superannuation.  He was a bit strict on non-performing teachers.  They, in connivance with GSTA lodged false complaints against him. Consequently, he was transferred frequently.  His last transfer was from RSBV Gulabi Bagh (Distt. North) to GSBV Khajoori Khas (Distt. North East) just before 5 months of his superannuation.  He protested against his transfer with the Director of Education and this court but did not get any relief. 

2.     Subsequently, district North East did not issue his vigilance clearance report, although no case was pending against him.  Delay in releasing his retirement benefits was therefore wilful and to harass him.  The complainant therefore requested that his retiral benefits be released at the earliest and responsibility should be fixed for delay in issuing the vigilance clearance report at the District Level and his Re-employment case should also be processed.

3.     The complaint was taken up with the respondents vide letter dated 11.04.2019 followed by a reminder dated 23.04.2019.  As there was no response, a show cause-cum-hearing notice dated 24.05.2019 was issued and the respondents were directed to show cause why they should not make payment of retiral benefits to the complainant within 2 weeks from the date of receipt of the notice and submit reasons for delay and the para-wise comments by 10.06.2019.  A hearing was also scheduled on 25.06.2019.

4.     During the hearing, Dy. Director of Education, Distt. North East vide letter dated 24.06.2019, submitted as under:
“Subject: Reply to Show-Cause-Cum-Hearing Notice dated 24.05.2019
Reference above, it is submitted that all payment of retiral benefits have been amde to Shri Arvind Sharma as per the details given below:
Serial Number
Retiral Benefit
Amount (Rupees)
Credited into the complainant’s account on (Date)
1
GPF Final Payment
2370036/-
16/05/2019
2
D.C.R.G
1466858/-
22/05/2019
3
Commutation of Pension
1769904/-
22/05/2019
4
Leave Encashment
981000/-
27/05/2019
5
UTGEIS
60983/-
27/05/2019

It is also informed that Sh. Arvind Sharma has been given re-employment vide Transfer Order dated 07/06/2019 and posted in Sarvodaya Bal Vidyalaya, Jafrabad, Delhi-110053.
It is humbly submitted that processing of retiral benefits started only after receipt of Vigilance Clearance Report by the School (Sarvodaya Bal Vidyalaya, Khajoori Khas, Delhi-110090) on 25/02/2019.  The delay in release of payment was due to sending back of filed to the school again and again to remove certain deficiencies.


(Satpal Singh)
Deputy Director of Education
District North East”

5.     The complainant reiterated his written submissions and added that he met all the concerned officers namely the Dy. Director, Special Director and Regional Director Education.  However, none of the officers considered his request and ensured release of retiral benefits in time.  He visited the Offices of Dy. Director, North East, Yamuna Vihar, Dr. Neeraj, 14 times.  But she did not make any effort to release the amount.

6.     It is observed that the retiral benefits on account of GPF Final Payment, D.C.R.G, Commutation of Pension, Leave Encashment and UTGEIS work out to Rs. 6648781/- which were supposed to be paid to the complainant by January, 2019.  Admittedly, there was no reason for delay in releasing the amount to the complainant.  An amount of more than Rs. 2.25 lakh would have accrued as interest on Rs. 66,48,781/- in the post office @ 8.25% for 5 months.

7.     In view of the above, it is recommended that respondent no. 1 should fix the responsibility for delaying the release of the retiral benefits to the complainant and explore the possibility of compensating him by recovering the amount from those who were responsible for causing such a huge loss to the complainant. 

8.     Action taken report be intimated to this court within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.

9.     The complaint is disposed of.

10.   Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 26th day of June, 2019.



(T.D.Dhariyal)
State Commissioner of Person with Disabilities


Saturday, June 22, 2019

Jitendar Khattolia Vs. EDMC & Others | Case No. 452/1083/2018/08/3011-3014 | Dated 21.06.2019




    In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 452/1083/2018/08/3011-3014
Case No. 296/1083/2018/05/3011-3014                    Dated:21.06.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Jitendar Khattolia,
S/o Sh. Late Nihal Chand,
5/290, Trilokpuri,
Near Chand Cinema,
Delhi – 110091.                                                    ................ Complainant
                          

Versus

The Commissioner,
East Delhi Municipal Corporation,
419, Udyog Sadan,
Patparganj Industrial Area,
Delhi-110096.  
Email: Commissioner-edmc@mcd.gov.in      ………...…Respondent No.1


The Deputy Commissioner of Police
(East District),
Near Mandawali, Fazalpur,
I.P. Extn., Patparganj,
Delhi – 110092.                                            ………...…Respondent No.2


The Commissioner of Police,
Delhi Police,
Police Headquarters, MSO Building.
I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002.                   ………...…Respondent No.3  

  
Date of Hearing:      17.06.2019

Present:                    Sh. Jitendar Khattolia, Complainant on phone

Sh. Deepak Upadhayay, L.I., Sh. P.K. Tewari, AE(Bldg.) and Sh. S.K. Pandey, J.L.O. on behalf of Respondent No. 1
                            

ORDER

         The above named complainant, a person with 87% locomotor disability and a wheel chair user vide his complaint dated 23.05.2018 received through e-mail, submitted that he does not have parents.  His only source of income is the khoka which was allotted to him by MCD at MCD Booth A-2 corner, Mayur Vihar Phase-3, Near DTC bus stop vide license No. CL&EC/1370/2002/328 dated 11.07.2012.  The khoka was destroyed by MCD/Delhi Police on 08.05.2016 and thus he lost his only source of livelihood.  He expressed his disgust about having so many laws, rules, departments and policy, but not doing little on ground.  He further stated that he is in a very painful condition and is suffering physically, emotionally and mentally due to the act of the authorities.  He requested to give direction to the MCD for reconstructing his khoka and not to destroy it in future and also take appropriate action to safeguard his right as a person with disability.

2.      The complaint was taken up with respondent No.1 under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act, with a copy to DCP(East) vide letter dated 28.05.2018 with the request to submit the status report.  As there was no response, a hearing was scheduled on 30.08.2018.

3.      During the hearing on 30.08.2018, the complainant added that he had to procure another khoka with a cost of Rs.50,000/-.  He felt very insecure as the authorities destroyed his only source of livelihood for no valid reasons that he was earning in a lawful manner.  He prayed that the concerned officers should be fined to compensate him for destroying his booth and the instruments/equipments kept inside the booth such as earphones, phone covers, dummy mobiles phones and other accessories.

4.      No one appeared for the respondents.  However, someone from Delhi Police left a note with reference to Dy. No.5416/SHO/KP dated 28.07.2018 signed by ASI Krishan Kumar of Police Station Kalyan Puri dated 07.08.2018 marked to the Legal Cell/East mentioning that the area where khoka of the complainant is situated according to the complainant, is not in the jurisdiction of Police Station Kalyan Puri.  Therefore the complaint may be sent to the concerned Police Station.  The original summon dated 23.07.2018 addressed to DCP(East) was attached with note, which exhibited a casual approach in dealing with an important issue of a person with disability in distress.  DCP(East) was therefore advised to look into it personally and take appropriate action and submit a report by 14.09.2018.  Commissioner, EDMC was also advised to submit the report by 14.09.2018 and the names of the persons who destroyed the khoka of the complainant and the next hearing was fixed on 18.09.2018.

5.      As no report was received from DCP(East), Commissioner of Police, Delhi was impleaded as respondent and was requested to have the matter enquired and submit a report by 22.05.2019.   

6.      The representative of EDMC, Sh. Virender Kumar, Licensing Inspector, Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC submitted that to ascertain the details of the case, he needed some time as he had received the relevant papers on the date of hearing only.  Deputy Commissioner, Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC was therefore directed to inquire into the matter and submit a report by 22.05.2019 indicating the names of the EDMC functionaries responsible for destroying the complainant’s khoka.

7.      A copy of the complaint alongwith a photograph of a police official was also received through the Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities.  The complainant alleged that the said police official had a hand in destroying his khoka.
8.      Addl. DCP, East District Delhi vide report dated 21.05.2019 informed as under:-
     “An enquiry into the matter was got conducted through ACP/ Kalyanpuri and ACP/ Madhu Vihar.  During  enquiry, it was found that a letter No. EE(B)-II/Shah(S)/2018/D-162 dated 27.04.2018 was received in PS New Ashok Nagar from East Delhi Municipal Corporation, Shahdara (South) Zone Delhi regarding supply of Police force alongwith ladies staff for demolition/ sealing action against unauthorized construction on various properties i.e. in Ward Nos. 2E, 4E & 7E on 08.05.2018.
     As per the record of PS New Ashok Nagar, Sh. A.K. MIttal, JE, Shahdara Zone made his arrival in Police Station Ghazipur on 08.05.2018 vide DD. No. 44B alongwith his staff/ labour and the Police force was accordingly provided/ deployed under the supervision of the then SHO Inspr. C.R. Meena vide DD No. 45-B dated 08.05.2018.
     It is further submitted that the demolition/ sealing programme was conducted by EDMC on 08.05.2018.  The alleged kiosk of complainant was removed during that programme.  Police force was provided for the protection of the Municipal staff and maintaining the law and order situation.  Police has no authority to demolish any unauthorized construction.
     As per the report of ACP/ Madhu Vihar, during enquiry, it was found that on 13.02.2019, a request letter from Sh. Brij Pal Singh, Executive Engineer, ED-12, DDA was received at PS Ghazipur for providing police assistance to DDA staff for carrying out demolition/ removal of encroachment from DDA roads in Kondli Gharoli area under jurisdiction of ED-12/DDA.  The demolition/ encroachment removal date was fixed for 25.02.2019 (Monday). Encroachment/ unauthorized construction from the following DDA roads etc. was to be removed:-
1.    24m R/w road from Red Fox Hotel to IFC Pocket-C, Ghazipur.
2.    18m R/w road from Ryan Public School to Gutam Public School and Road between C1 & C2 at Kondli, Gharoli.
     The above area falls under the jurisdiction of PS Ghazipur and this operation started at 10:30 AM under the Supervision of AE-111 (QRT)/ED-12/DDA & Assistant Director (LM) East Zone.  The Executive Engineer requested to make available sufficient Police force including Ladies Police officer and tear gas squad to the DDA staff in order to maintain law and order situation under control during the demolition/ removal operation.
     On 25.02.2019 at 11:25 AM vide DD. No. 29, Sh. G.D. , AE, QRT, DDA, Geeta Colony Delhi (Mob. No. 9650490085) made his arrival in Police Station Ghazipur alongwith 10 staff, JCB, Bumper and 12 Labours for above mentioned encroachment/ removal programme.
     As per the request of Executive Engineer, Sh. Brij Pal Singh, Police staff 1 Inspector, 1 ASI, 5 HC and 2 Constable were provided to the DDA Staff for encroachment/ removal programme.   In accordance with their programme, DDA officials/ staff removed all the encroachment from DDA roads in Mayur Vihar, Phase-III, Delhi.
     As per the request of Executive Engineer, Sh. Brij Pal Singh, DDA, Police assistance was provided only for maintaining the law and order situation.  The whole programme of removing the encroachment was carried out by the DDA and Police has no role except providing security to DDA Authorities for carrying out their official duties smoothly.  Hence, the Hon’ble Court of the State Commissioner of People with Disabilities is requested to seek a report from DDA and EDMC reg. demolition of the kiosk of the complainant.”
9.      On 23.05.2019, the contents of the above letter were explained to the complainant and a copy of it was given to him. 

10.    It was observed that the photograph of the police personnel submitted by the complainant could not be accepted as evidence as the said police personnel is seen waiving at an auto rickshaw parked in the middle of the road.  Therefore, the complainant was directed that if he had any evidence/proof that any police personnel played any role in destroying his khokha, he should submit such evidence to the SHO, PS Gazipur/ACP, Madhu Vihar, who would submit a report on or before the next date of hearing after thorough investigation.  If no evidence was produced, respondent no. 2 and 3 were exempted from attending the hearing(s) in future and it was conveyed vide ROP dated 24.05.2019 that had the report been filed earlier, Commissioner of Police would not have been impleaded.  This explains why the police and all concerned authorities need to give due importance to the complaints/grievances of persons with disabilities and take prompt action on them.  

11.    As per the report dated 22.05.2019 submitted by Sh. Deepak Upadhayay on behalf of Commissioner during the hearing, Sh. A.K. Mittal, JE/ Shahdara South Zone/Bldg.II had approached New Ashok Nagar Police Station for police force for encroachment removal action on 08.05.2018.  Sealing action on property No. A-60 (Part), New Ashok Nagar was taken by that Building Department on 08.05.2018.  In view of this, the Administrative Officer, Shahdara (South) Zone has stated that it is not conclusive whether MCD took encroachment removal action against the khokha of the complainant.   He also clarified that as per rules/instructions, the authorised khokhas are not be destroyed.  Sh. P.K. Tewari, AE(Bldg.), who appeared for the hearing submitted a report dated 22.05.2019 vide which AC, Shahdara South Zone had requested EE(Bldg.-II) to file the status report.  As per internal notes, EE(Bldg.-II) Shahdara South Zone  did not fix any encroachment removal programme on 08.05.2018 and hence that building department was stated to be not concerned with the case.

12.    In view of the circumstances stated above, Commissioner, EDMC was advised to have the matter enquired and fix responsibility for destroying the khokha of the complainant and see whether the complainant could be compensated for the loss he suffered in re-constructing the khokha and submit a report by 17.06.2019.

13.    On 17.06.2019, Ms. Bhanu Prabha, Deputy Commissioner, Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC vide report dated 17.06.2019 informed that the matter was examined by her with the concerned departments i.e. the General Branch and Building Department.  The khoka in question was not removed or destroyed by either of the departments of Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC.  As per the supporting submissions of Administrative Officer, General Branch and J.E., Building Department, they did not undertake any encroachment removal drive in New Ashok Nagar Ward on 08.05.2018 and did not demolish/remove the khoka in question.

14.    The complainant was heard on telephone and informed about the reports.  He stuck to the point that the machine deployed by the civic authority for demolition/encroachment removal was used for destroying his khoka.  But it was very difficult for him to collect evidence/proof as to who organised destruction of his khoka.  The neighbouring shops/persons present at the spot at that time should be questioned by the police and find out who destroyed his khokha. 

15.    The concerned authorities, particularly the police cannot abdicate their responsibility to investigate and find out the culprits who deprived the complainant of his livelihood.  Respondent No. 2 should have gone beyond just obtaining the dates on which the civic authorities sought police force.   The officers of the two authorities i.e EDMC and Delhi Police have reported too little and too late! (after nearly one year).  The allegation of destroying the only source of livelihood of a wheel chair user by the officials of these Departments should have engaged their attention and prompted them to ensure that the matter is properly investigated, got the complainant’s khokha reconstructed/restored to him and the culprits brought to the book.  It was atrocious to ignore such a serious matter and do nothing for such a long time and leave the hapless person with disability to fend for himself and expect him to collect evidence. 

16.    DCP(East District) is therefore directed to take immediate steps to find out the culprits and take action under the law and submit a report to this court within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order.  The complainant may also provide to the DCP(East District) any relevant information/evidence that he may be able to collect in connection with the case. 

17.    The respondents are also directed to ensure that the complainant is not harassed, intimidated and be allowed to earn his livelihood in a lawful manner.  They should provide all possible support to the complainant in his endeavour to live a life of dignity and self-respect.

18.    The complaint is disposed of with the above directions.

19.    An action taken report in the matter be intimated to this court within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.   

20.    Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 21st day of June, 2019.






(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities