Showing posts with label Khoka destroyed by police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Khoka destroyed by police. Show all posts

Saturday, June 29, 2019

Radhey Shyam Nishad Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. | Case No. 754/1083/2019/02/3136-3138 | Dated:28.06.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 754/1083/2019/02/3136-3138                          Dated:28.06.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Radhey Shyam Nishad
Dukh Haran House No. B-151,
Balbir Vihar, Kirari, Suleman Nagar,
Sultanpuri, C-Block, North West Delhi,
Delhi-110086.                                                             …….Complainant

                                          Versus                           
The Commissioner,
North Delhi Municipal Corporation,
Dr. S.P.M. Civic Centre, Minto Road,
New Delhi-110002.                                            ……...…Respondent no. 1
(Kind Attnt: Ms. Veditha Reddy, Dy. Commissioner
Smt. Raj Rani, Addl. Dy. Commissioner)

The Deputy Commissioner of Police
(Outer Distrcit)
Guru Hari kishan Marg,
Maulana Azad Society,
Pushpanjali Enclave, Pitampur,
Delhi-110034.                                                    ….…….Respondent no. 2

Date of Order:      26.06.2019

Present:     Sh. Radhey Shyam Nishad, complainant in person.
Smt. Raj Rani, Addl. Dy. Commissioner, Rohini Zone alongwith Sh. Sushil Kumar, Zonal Supdt. For Respondent no. 1
                   Sh. Baljit Singh, ASI No. 286/00 for respondent no. 2.
           
ORDER
The above named complainant, a person with 100% visual impairment vide his complaint dated 14.02.2019 submitted that he was residing in his khoka in front of ward no. 45 near Sultan Puri Bus Terminal, New Delhi-86.  He used to sleep in the same khoka and earn his livelihood and was also studying.  The personnel from the PCR Van used to make in appropriate comments on him and a security guard set up a tea shop near his khokha with the intention to get his khoka removed.  Thereafter, some persons from MCD came and took away his khoka in which his books, reading/recording devices, clothes etc. were kept.  The books and the reading devices were issued by the University and until these are returned, the University would not declare his result.  He therefore, requested that his Khoka and articles should be returned to him and arrangement for his stay should also be made. 
2.       The complaint was taken up with the respondents under the provisions of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as “Act” vide letter dated 28.02.2019 followed by reminder dated 13.03.2019.  DCP North West District forwarded the complaint to DCP (Outer District).  As there was no response from respondents, a hearing was scheduled on 26.06.2019 vide summon dated 27.05.2019.
3.       Smt. Raj Rani, Addl. Dy. Commissioner, Rohini Zone who appeared alongwith Sh. Sushil Kumar, Zonal Superintendent submitted a reply dated 25.06.2019 which states that a complaint dated 17-12-2018 was received from Sh. Sumit Tomar vide which he had alleged that some anti-social elements had setup khokas near Sultan Puri Bus stand.  Those khokas were operated on the name of persons with disabilities by some persons without disabilities. Sh. Tomar also submitted the same complaint during the meeting of the SDM (Kanjhawala), wherein the SDM also directed the staff of the North DMC to take action against illegal khokas.    Thereafter, the staff of the Licensing Department and Maintenance Department of the Rohini Zone, North DMC alongwith staff of Delhi Police (PS-Sultan Puri) taken action against such illegal khokas on 15-01-2019. During the action, 06 no. of illegal khokas were impounded and were deposited in the Zonal Store. 04 khokas were released after receipt of fine from the defaulters. The photos taken during the action were also enclosed with the reply.
4.       Smt. Raj Rani also informed that khoka can be returned only after payment of penalty and as the complainant is not having any license, he should apply for the same with TVC.   
5.       After hearing the parties, it is observed that the only source of livelihood of the complainant has been lost and his studies disrupted.  He has no support whatsoever in Delhi except disability pension of Rs. 2,500/- per month.  He has no savings to pay the penalty which is estimated to be more than Rs. 22,000/- and get his Khokha released.  In view of the fact that the complainant had submitted the complainant on 14.02.2019 and has been pleading to release his khoka ever since, the penalty charges should be waived and his khoka alongwith his belongings should be returned to him with the minimum possible fine not exceeding Rs. 2,000/- and a report be submitted within 15 days of receipt of this order.
6.       The complainant is advised to apply for license for tehbajari/khoka after first July 2019 and Sh. Sushil Kumar will extend necessary assistance in this regard.
7.       The complaint is disposed of.  
8.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 28th day of June, 2019.  
     

                                                                           (T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Saturday, June 22, 2019

Jitendar Khattolia Vs. EDMC & Others | Case No. 452/1083/2018/08/3011-3014 | Dated 21.06.2019




    In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 452/1083/2018/08/3011-3014
Case No. 296/1083/2018/05/3011-3014                    Dated:21.06.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Jitendar Khattolia,
S/o Sh. Late Nihal Chand,
5/290, Trilokpuri,
Near Chand Cinema,
Delhi – 110091.                                                    ................ Complainant
                          

Versus

The Commissioner,
East Delhi Municipal Corporation,
419, Udyog Sadan,
Patparganj Industrial Area,
Delhi-110096.  
Email: Commissioner-edmc@mcd.gov.in      ………...…Respondent No.1


The Deputy Commissioner of Police
(East District),
Near Mandawali, Fazalpur,
I.P. Extn., Patparganj,
Delhi – 110092.                                            ………...…Respondent No.2


The Commissioner of Police,
Delhi Police,
Police Headquarters, MSO Building.
I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002.                   ………...…Respondent No.3  

  
Date of Hearing:      17.06.2019

Present:                    Sh. Jitendar Khattolia, Complainant on phone

Sh. Deepak Upadhayay, L.I., Sh. P.K. Tewari, AE(Bldg.) and Sh. S.K. Pandey, J.L.O. on behalf of Respondent No. 1
                            

ORDER

         The above named complainant, a person with 87% locomotor disability and a wheel chair user vide his complaint dated 23.05.2018 received through e-mail, submitted that he does not have parents.  His only source of income is the khoka which was allotted to him by MCD at MCD Booth A-2 corner, Mayur Vihar Phase-3, Near DTC bus stop vide license No. CL&EC/1370/2002/328 dated 11.07.2012.  The khoka was destroyed by MCD/Delhi Police on 08.05.2016 and thus he lost his only source of livelihood.  He expressed his disgust about having so many laws, rules, departments and policy, but not doing little on ground.  He further stated that he is in a very painful condition and is suffering physically, emotionally and mentally due to the act of the authorities.  He requested to give direction to the MCD for reconstructing his khoka and not to destroy it in future and also take appropriate action to safeguard his right as a person with disability.

2.      The complaint was taken up with respondent No.1 under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act, with a copy to DCP(East) vide letter dated 28.05.2018 with the request to submit the status report.  As there was no response, a hearing was scheduled on 30.08.2018.

3.      During the hearing on 30.08.2018, the complainant added that he had to procure another khoka with a cost of Rs.50,000/-.  He felt very insecure as the authorities destroyed his only source of livelihood for no valid reasons that he was earning in a lawful manner.  He prayed that the concerned officers should be fined to compensate him for destroying his booth and the instruments/equipments kept inside the booth such as earphones, phone covers, dummy mobiles phones and other accessories.

4.      No one appeared for the respondents.  However, someone from Delhi Police left a note with reference to Dy. No.5416/SHO/KP dated 28.07.2018 signed by ASI Krishan Kumar of Police Station Kalyan Puri dated 07.08.2018 marked to the Legal Cell/East mentioning that the area where khoka of the complainant is situated according to the complainant, is not in the jurisdiction of Police Station Kalyan Puri.  Therefore the complaint may be sent to the concerned Police Station.  The original summon dated 23.07.2018 addressed to DCP(East) was attached with note, which exhibited a casual approach in dealing with an important issue of a person with disability in distress.  DCP(East) was therefore advised to look into it personally and take appropriate action and submit a report by 14.09.2018.  Commissioner, EDMC was also advised to submit the report by 14.09.2018 and the names of the persons who destroyed the khoka of the complainant and the next hearing was fixed on 18.09.2018.

5.      As no report was received from DCP(East), Commissioner of Police, Delhi was impleaded as respondent and was requested to have the matter enquired and submit a report by 22.05.2019.   

6.      The representative of EDMC, Sh. Virender Kumar, Licensing Inspector, Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC submitted that to ascertain the details of the case, he needed some time as he had received the relevant papers on the date of hearing only.  Deputy Commissioner, Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC was therefore directed to inquire into the matter and submit a report by 22.05.2019 indicating the names of the EDMC functionaries responsible for destroying the complainant’s khoka.

7.      A copy of the complaint alongwith a photograph of a police official was also received through the Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities.  The complainant alleged that the said police official had a hand in destroying his khoka.
8.      Addl. DCP, East District Delhi vide report dated 21.05.2019 informed as under:-
     “An enquiry into the matter was got conducted through ACP/ Kalyanpuri and ACP/ Madhu Vihar.  During  enquiry, it was found that a letter No. EE(B)-II/Shah(S)/2018/D-162 dated 27.04.2018 was received in PS New Ashok Nagar from East Delhi Municipal Corporation, Shahdara (South) Zone Delhi regarding supply of Police force alongwith ladies staff for demolition/ sealing action against unauthorized construction on various properties i.e. in Ward Nos. 2E, 4E & 7E on 08.05.2018.
     As per the record of PS New Ashok Nagar, Sh. A.K. MIttal, JE, Shahdara Zone made his arrival in Police Station Ghazipur on 08.05.2018 vide DD. No. 44B alongwith his staff/ labour and the Police force was accordingly provided/ deployed under the supervision of the then SHO Inspr. C.R. Meena vide DD No. 45-B dated 08.05.2018.
     It is further submitted that the demolition/ sealing programme was conducted by EDMC on 08.05.2018.  The alleged kiosk of complainant was removed during that programme.  Police force was provided for the protection of the Municipal staff and maintaining the law and order situation.  Police has no authority to demolish any unauthorized construction.
     As per the report of ACP/ Madhu Vihar, during enquiry, it was found that on 13.02.2019, a request letter from Sh. Brij Pal Singh, Executive Engineer, ED-12, DDA was received at PS Ghazipur for providing police assistance to DDA staff for carrying out demolition/ removal of encroachment from DDA roads in Kondli Gharoli area under jurisdiction of ED-12/DDA.  The demolition/ encroachment removal date was fixed for 25.02.2019 (Monday). Encroachment/ unauthorized construction from the following DDA roads etc. was to be removed:-
1.    24m R/w road from Red Fox Hotel to IFC Pocket-C, Ghazipur.
2.    18m R/w road from Ryan Public School to Gutam Public School and Road between C1 & C2 at Kondli, Gharoli.
     The above area falls under the jurisdiction of PS Ghazipur and this operation started at 10:30 AM under the Supervision of AE-111 (QRT)/ED-12/DDA & Assistant Director (LM) East Zone.  The Executive Engineer requested to make available sufficient Police force including Ladies Police officer and tear gas squad to the DDA staff in order to maintain law and order situation under control during the demolition/ removal operation.
     On 25.02.2019 at 11:25 AM vide DD. No. 29, Sh. G.D. , AE, QRT, DDA, Geeta Colony Delhi (Mob. No. 9650490085) made his arrival in Police Station Ghazipur alongwith 10 staff, JCB, Bumper and 12 Labours for above mentioned encroachment/ removal programme.
     As per the request of Executive Engineer, Sh. Brij Pal Singh, Police staff 1 Inspector, 1 ASI, 5 HC and 2 Constable were provided to the DDA Staff for encroachment/ removal programme.   In accordance with their programme, DDA officials/ staff removed all the encroachment from DDA roads in Mayur Vihar, Phase-III, Delhi.
     As per the request of Executive Engineer, Sh. Brij Pal Singh, DDA, Police assistance was provided only for maintaining the law and order situation.  The whole programme of removing the encroachment was carried out by the DDA and Police has no role except providing security to DDA Authorities for carrying out their official duties smoothly.  Hence, the Hon’ble Court of the State Commissioner of People with Disabilities is requested to seek a report from DDA and EDMC reg. demolition of the kiosk of the complainant.”
9.      On 23.05.2019, the contents of the above letter were explained to the complainant and a copy of it was given to him. 

10.    It was observed that the photograph of the police personnel submitted by the complainant could not be accepted as evidence as the said police personnel is seen waiving at an auto rickshaw parked in the middle of the road.  Therefore, the complainant was directed that if he had any evidence/proof that any police personnel played any role in destroying his khokha, he should submit such evidence to the SHO, PS Gazipur/ACP, Madhu Vihar, who would submit a report on or before the next date of hearing after thorough investigation.  If no evidence was produced, respondent no. 2 and 3 were exempted from attending the hearing(s) in future and it was conveyed vide ROP dated 24.05.2019 that had the report been filed earlier, Commissioner of Police would not have been impleaded.  This explains why the police and all concerned authorities need to give due importance to the complaints/grievances of persons with disabilities and take prompt action on them.  

11.    As per the report dated 22.05.2019 submitted by Sh. Deepak Upadhayay on behalf of Commissioner during the hearing, Sh. A.K. Mittal, JE/ Shahdara South Zone/Bldg.II had approached New Ashok Nagar Police Station for police force for encroachment removal action on 08.05.2018.  Sealing action on property No. A-60 (Part), New Ashok Nagar was taken by that Building Department on 08.05.2018.  In view of this, the Administrative Officer, Shahdara (South) Zone has stated that it is not conclusive whether MCD took encroachment removal action against the khokha of the complainant.   He also clarified that as per rules/instructions, the authorised khokhas are not be destroyed.  Sh. P.K. Tewari, AE(Bldg.), who appeared for the hearing submitted a report dated 22.05.2019 vide which AC, Shahdara South Zone had requested EE(Bldg.-II) to file the status report.  As per internal notes, EE(Bldg.-II) Shahdara South Zone  did not fix any encroachment removal programme on 08.05.2018 and hence that building department was stated to be not concerned with the case.

12.    In view of the circumstances stated above, Commissioner, EDMC was advised to have the matter enquired and fix responsibility for destroying the khokha of the complainant and see whether the complainant could be compensated for the loss he suffered in re-constructing the khokha and submit a report by 17.06.2019.

13.    On 17.06.2019, Ms. Bhanu Prabha, Deputy Commissioner, Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC vide report dated 17.06.2019 informed that the matter was examined by her with the concerned departments i.e. the General Branch and Building Department.  The khoka in question was not removed or destroyed by either of the departments of Shahdara (South) Zone, EDMC.  As per the supporting submissions of Administrative Officer, General Branch and J.E., Building Department, they did not undertake any encroachment removal drive in New Ashok Nagar Ward on 08.05.2018 and did not demolish/remove the khoka in question.

14.    The complainant was heard on telephone and informed about the reports.  He stuck to the point that the machine deployed by the civic authority for demolition/encroachment removal was used for destroying his khoka.  But it was very difficult for him to collect evidence/proof as to who organised destruction of his khoka.  The neighbouring shops/persons present at the spot at that time should be questioned by the police and find out who destroyed his khokha. 

15.    The concerned authorities, particularly the police cannot abdicate their responsibility to investigate and find out the culprits who deprived the complainant of his livelihood.  Respondent No. 2 should have gone beyond just obtaining the dates on which the civic authorities sought police force.   The officers of the two authorities i.e EDMC and Delhi Police have reported too little and too late! (after nearly one year).  The allegation of destroying the only source of livelihood of a wheel chair user by the officials of these Departments should have engaged their attention and prompted them to ensure that the matter is properly investigated, got the complainant’s khokha reconstructed/restored to him and the culprits brought to the book.  It was atrocious to ignore such a serious matter and do nothing for such a long time and leave the hapless person with disability to fend for himself and expect him to collect evidence. 

16.    DCP(East District) is therefore directed to take immediate steps to find out the culprits and take action under the law and submit a report to this court within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order.  The complainant may also provide to the DCP(East District) any relevant information/evidence that he may be able to collect in connection with the case. 

17.    The respondents are also directed to ensure that the complainant is not harassed, intimidated and be allowed to earn his livelihood in a lawful manner.  They should provide all possible support to the complainant in his endeavour to live a life of dignity and self-respect.

18.    The complaint is disposed of with the above directions.

19.    An action taken report in the matter be intimated to this court within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.   

20.    Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 21st day of June, 2019.






(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Thursday, May 31, 2018

Krishan Lal Vs. Commissioner, East Delhi Municipal Corporation | Case No. 127/1083/2018/02/7555-56A | Dated: 30.05.2018




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 127/1083/2018/02/7555-56A                                          Dated: 30.05.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Krishan Lal,
S/o Late Sh. Sadhu Lal,
H.No.77-A, Gali no.-11, 
New Lahore Colony,
Shastri Nagar,  Delhi – 110 031.                                   ……….Complainant             

                                                    Versus

The Commissioner,
East Delhi Municipal Corporation
419, Udyog Sadan,
Patparganj Industrial Area,
Delhi – 110 092.                                              …………Respondent


Present: Sh. Krishan Lal,  Complainant
Respondent :     None present

Date of hearing: 25.05.2018


ORDER

The above named complainant, a person with 88% locomotor disability vide his complaint dated 22.01.2018 submitted that he was allowed to run a PCO booth and sell some eatables from a kiosk at DDA Community Centre, New Lahore Colony, Shastri Nagar, Delhi – 110 031 near SDM office.  He has 83 years old mother and his father expired when he was a child.  He was earning his livelihood through the said PCO/kiosk.  On 13.01.2018, EDMC demolished his kiosk and destroyed all the material.  He further submitted that he should be allowed to earn his livelihood through the PCO booth so that he can earn his livelihood and be self dependent.  

2. The complaint was taken up with the respondent vide notice dated 06.03.2018 followed by a reminder dated 21.03.2018.  As there was no response, a hearing was scheduled on 25.05.2018.

3. The respondent neither submitted any reply to the notice nor did any one appear on his behalf on the date of hearing despite summons.  The complainant reiterated his written submissions and explained his plight due to destruction of the only means of livelihood.  The complainant added that he applied for a PCO booth/kiosk in 2001 vide diary No. 3729-CL&EC dated 14.12.2001.  He again applied for PCO booth/tehbazari vide receipt No.123002 dated 13.09.2007 of Central Licensing and Enforcement Cell, MCD, Nigam Bhawan, Kashmere Gate, Delhi – 110 006 under the scheme of MCD for squatters/hawkers. However, he has not been allotted any PCO booth/kiosk till date.  During the hearing, complainant also submitted that he is an ITI trained Machinist but due to amputation of his right arm and left arm fingers, he is not able to do the work of his trade.  Therefore, it is important that his means of livelihood i.e. the PCO booth is restored.  He also submitted that he should be compensated by the EDMC for destroying his PCO booth and the material without any notice and for showing complete insensitivity to him as a person with severe disability. 

4. It is a matter of concern that neither any reply was submitted on behalf of Commissioner, EDMC nor did anyone appear.

5. This court vide order dated 27.07.2017 (copy enclosed) in a common order passed on the complaints of a large number of persons with disabilities who had been either doing vending or had applied for allotment of kiosks, recommended the following:
(i) The persons with disabilities who were vending as on 13.09.2013, should not be disturbed and be allowed to earn their livelihood by selling various articles.
(ii)  Persons with disabilities who fulfilled eligibility conditions and had applied for vending licence, allotment of kiosks etc. before 13.09.2013 but were not issued the licence while whose who applied after them were given the licence, should not be denied vending right on the ground that their names do not exist in the list of registered vendors as they would have been covered under this ‘existing vendors’ as on 13.09.2013 had their applications been processed in time by the concerned Municipal authorities.  Such vendors should however produce the proof of having applied for the vending licence, allotment of kiosks, etc.
(iii) The concerned functionaries of the Municipalities/Cantonment Board should be properly and adequately sensitised to deal with persons with disabilities with dignity, particularly while seizing and releasing their goods (perishable/non-perishable) which should be released within the prescribed time limit and be considerate in levying fines.
6. The complainant in this case falls under category (i).  Therefore, he should be allowed to earn his livelihood from a kiosk of appropriate size either from the place his booth was displaced and destroyed or from a nearby suitable place.  The respondent is directed to intimate this court about the arrangement made in consultation with the complainant by 15.06.2018 failing which it will be presumed that the complainant can set up a kiosk at an appropriate location without obstructing free movement of people/traffic and affecting public order to earn his livelihood.  

7.    Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 30th day of May, 2018.     




(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Encl.:- As above

Copy to :


Deputy Commissioner of Police, 
  Shalimar Bagh, Farsh Bazar,
Shahdara, Delhi – 110 032. 
(Near Police Station Farsh Bazar)