Saturday, January 13, 2018

Vijay Nath Mishra Vs. DCP (North West), Delhi Police | Case No. 4/ 1724/2017-Wel/CD/3841-42 | Dated:12.01.2018



In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/ 1724/2017-Wel/CD/3841-42                                  Dated:12.01.2018

In the matter of:

Mr. Vijay Nath Mishra
S/o Parasnath Mishra,
M.B. Road, Shakarpur,
Delhi-110092.                                                                                  .……… Complainant     

                                                                      Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
North West District,
Ashok Vihar, Delhi-110052.                                                              …...…Respondent
 

Date of hearing:           09.01.2018

Present                           Sh. Vijay Nath Mishra, Complainant.
                                          None on behalf of the respondent.

            
ORDER

                The above named complainant, a person with blindness vide his complaint dated 13.07.2017 submitted that  he purchased a plot measuring 150 yards, khasra No. 1030, village Qadi Vihar, Delhi from Sh. Anand Swaroop S/o Sh. Nepal Singh on 28.07.2006.  He also got work done on the plot from time to time.  On 22.06.2017, three unknown persons came to his house.  One of them mentioned his name as Dharmender of Alipur.  He asked him to meet him in the house of Sh. Sudhir Rana with the papers of the plot.  He threatened to kill him if he did not do so.  He wants to do construction work in his plot.  However, he is afraid of those persons.  In June, 2016 one Sh. Jagdish, S/o Sh. Mahender also harassed him and claimed ownership of the plot.  He had filed complaints with S.H.O. (Swaroop Nagar), Delhi.

2.      Reiterating his earlier submissions,  the complainant vide his letter dated 17.11.2017  added that the S.H.O. (Swaroop Nagar), Sh. Bharat Ram Meena did not give much attention to the matter.  The complainant, therefore, requested for an early intervention.

3.      The complaint was taken up with the respondent vide letter dated 06.07.2017 followed by reminder dated 16.11.2017.  As there was no response from the respondent, a hearing was scheduled on 09.01.2018.

4.      During the hearing on 09.01.2018, the complainant submitted that the case falls under the jurisdiction of Dy. Commissioner of Police (North West District), Ashok Vihar whereas the notice of hearing has been sent to DCP(North District), Civil Lines.  This probably is the reason why the respondent has not been represented in the hearing.  Reiterating his submissions, the complainant stated that the vigilance enquiry conducted by the PG Cell, North West District has already established that the plot belongs to him.  However, because of insufficient support of Police, he is not able to carry out any kind of construction activity in his plot of land measuring 150 Sq. Yards.  He requested that the DCP (North West) may be advised  to provide police personnel to enable him to carry out some construction work in the plot as Sh. Dharmender threatened him and the concerned police officials do not provide him the required support.

5       From the record it is observed that the vigilance enquiry conducted by Inspector (North West) concluded that the complainant is in possession of plot measuring 150 Sq. Yards bearing khasra no. 1030, A- Block, Qadi Vihar, Swaroop Nagar, Delhi.  ACP, PG Cell, North West  District in his remarks dated 31.08.2017 also recorded that the S.I. Sajjan Singh of Police Station , Swaroop Nagar conducted the enquiry in a lackadaisical manner.  It supports the contention of the complainant that the local Police personnel have not been providing him the required assistance and support.  Complainant also submitted that fed up with the law enforcing agency and the attitude of the members of the society,  he has approached the Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court in Rohini for relief.

6.      Section 7 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 provides for protection of abuse, violence and exploitation of the persons with disabilities and sub-section 4 of Section 7 casts an obligation on a Police Officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know of  abuse, violence or exploitation towards any person with disability to extend necessary support and protection to such a person with disability.  In this regard, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi  vide Circular No. 28/2017 dated 25.10.2017  has directed all the DCPs to take necessary action to make the Inquiry Officers aware of the provisions the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and to ensure its effective implementation. 

7.      Notwithstanding the fact that the complainant has already approached Metropolitan Magistrate Court (Rohini), DCP (North  West), Ashok Vihar is advised to extend necessary support to the complainant to enable him to carry out the construction activity in his plot.  It may also be ensured that the complainant is not harassed, abused, or exploited by any person and his rights are not infringed.

8.      In the light of the above position, the complaint is disposed of.

9.     Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 12th day of January,  2018.

           (T.D. Dhariyal )
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities




Thursday, January 11, 2018

Hemlata Arya Vs. DSSSB | Case No. 4/1340/2016-Wel/CD/3790-91 | Dated: 10.01.2018




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/1340/2016-Wel/CD/3790-91                                       Dated: 10.01.2018

In the matter of:
Ms. Hemlata Arya
Hemlata723@gmail.com                                                      ....................Petitioner
Versus

The Chairman
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board
GNCT of Delhi
FC-18, Institutional Area
Karkardooma, New Delhi -110092                                        ..................Respondent

ORDER

            The above named complainant vide her email dated 22.06.2016 submitted that she cleared DSSSB exam of teacher (Social Science) is a SC Candidate.  Before 3 months she underwent total Hip Replacement Surgery of Right side and left side was also to be operated in August, 2016.  Due to this she has problem in her legs.  She wanted to know whether she would be treated as a person with Locomotor Disability or not and should she need a disability certificate after her second operation and whether she would continue to be SC Candidate or will her candidature be cancelled due to the Hip Joint Transplant.  The said email was received from Office of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities vide email dated 22.06.2016. 

2.         The matter was taken up with DSSSB vide communication dated 05.09.2016.  DSSSB vide letter dated 16.12.2016 informed that the complainant had applied under SC Category and her nomination has also been considered under SC category.  The Board cannot make any changes in respect of her category, his educational qualifications; date of birth etc. and that eligibility of candidate in all respects including caste status is to be decided on the crucial date corresponding to their advertisement i.e. 20.03.2013.  The letter dated 16.12.2016 of DSSSB was forwarded to the complainant for comments if any vide letter dated 24.01.2017, as no comments have been received from the complainant and moreover, she is not a person of disability. 

3.         The complaint is disposed off accordingly.

4.         Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 09th day of January, 2017.



(T.D. DHARIYAL)
Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Saturday, January 6, 2018

Vikas Sharma Vs. Director, Dte of Employment | Case No. 4/1075/2015-Wel/CD/3770-71 | Dated: 05.01.2018



In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/1075/2015-Wel/CD/3770-71                                            Dated: 05.01.2018

In the matter of:

Pt. Vikas Sharma,
Chairman, Disabled Helpline Foundation, India
Sharmaptvikas@gmail.com.                                                    .……… Complainant     


                                                                     Versus

The Director,
Directorate of Employment, GNCT of Delhi,
C-Block, 5-Sham Nath Marg, Delhi.                                           …...…Respondent
 
ORDER

              The above named complainant vide his complaint dated 06.08.2015 addressed to Hon’ble Chief Minister, Govt. of Delhi with copies  to Commissioner, Persons with Disabilities, Govt. of NCT of Delhi among others,  pointed out some problems faced by persons with disabilities  during the Job Summit 2015 organised on 1st August, 2015 by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi.  The issues ranged from pre-summit preparation to awareness, assistance during the summit and placement of  persons with disabilities. 

2.           The complaint was taken up with the respondent vide communication dated  10.08.2015  followed five reminders and  a hearing on 17.11.2016.  However, neither any comments were received nor did any person appear on 17.11.2016.  Thereafter, another hearing was scheduled on 03.01.2018.

3.           Sh. Pawan Kamra, Sr. Regional Employment Officer(SREO), Directorate of Employment  filed a written submission dated 03.01.2018, which reads as under:-

“1.The mandate of Directorate of Employment is to constitute /create a platform between Employers and Employees for getting employment. Though all the related work is being done online, on the website www.employment.delhigovt.nic.in but to go forward further to facilitate Employers and Employees, Directorate is organising Job Fairs for general and for person with disabilities from time to time.
          2.  On 1st August 2015, Directorate has also organised a Job Summit for persons with disabilities and its status report is enclosed as Annexure-I.
         3.  If petitioner has any suggestions for improvement, the Directorate shall welcome it.”

 4.          As per Annexure-I, the details of placement of persons with disabilities on 01.08.2015 is as under:-
S.No.
Name of Company
Total Short Listed
PWD Category
1.
Netambit
12
12(OH)
2.
KFC (Yami)
4
4 (HI)
3.
Pepsico
32
32(OH)
4.
Concentrix
12
12 (OH)
5.
Aegis
31
31(OH)
6.
Vodafone
25
20(OH)
5(VI)
7.
Steria
12
12(OH)
8.
Minda
14
5 (OH)
9(HI)

Total
142


(OH) Orthopedically Handicapped =       124
(VI) Visually Impaired                     =            5
(HI) Hearing Impaired                     =         130
                                                          ___________
Total                                                 =       142
                                                          ____________ 

5.           Sh. Pawan Kamra further added that they have the information about the number of persons with disabilities short-listed by companies.  The information about the number of short-listed candidates actually joined is not available.

6.           As the complainant did not personally appear, he was contacted on his given telephone number.  The written submission of the respondent was read over to him to enable him to make his statement / rejoinder on telephone itself so that the case would be disposed of.  The complainant agreed to this process of recording his statement.  He suggested that in many cases persons with disabilities are short-listed and offered jobs but only a few are retained. He therefore, suggested that before organising the next Job Fair / in six months, the Directorate of Employment should get the information from the companies about the number of candidates with disabilities who actually joined and continue to work.

7.           It will be worth while to discuss the relevant provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 which has come into force w.e.f 19.04.2017.  The relevant sections are as under:-

“2(x) Public facilities and services includes all forms of delivery of services to the public at large, including housing, educational and vocational trainings, employment and career advancement, shopping or marketing, religious, cultural, leisure or recreational, medical, health and rehabilitation, banking, finance and insurance, communication, postal and information, access to justice, public utilities, transportation.
20.Non-discrimination in employment.—(1) No Government establishment shall discriminate against any person with disability in any matter relating to employment: Provided that the appropriate Government may, having regard to the type of work carried on in any establishment, by notification and subject to such conditions, if any, exempt any establishment from the provisions of this section.
35. Incentives to employers in private sector - The appropriate Government and the local authorities shall, within the limit of their economic capacity and development, provide incentives to employer in private sector to ensure that at least five per cent. of their work force is composed of persons with benchmark disability.”

8.           Government of India (Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities) has introduced a scheme w.e.f. 01.04.2008 under which Central Govt. will pay employer’s share of EPF and ESI contribution for the first three years for a person with disability employed in a private sector establishment.  Another measure to incentivise the employment of persons with disabilities in private sector is the scheme of National Award for best employer and placement officer or agency. Under this, three awards one each to Government Sector, Public Sector Undertakings or local Govt. body and private or non-government organisation.  The award is comprises of the cash of Rs. 1,00,000/- , a citation, a certificate and a medal.  For best Placement Officer / Agency, a award comprising cash of Rs. 50000/-,  a citation / certificate and a shield.

9.           Section 40 to 46 of the Act provide for access to built environment, transport,  information and communication technology and services.

10.         It  is observed that Govt. of NCT of  Delhi  will be organising  a Mega Job Fair on 15-16th February, 2018 in which the companies and job seekers can register online on the Job Fair Portal  i.e. www.jobfair.delhi.giov.in.  As private as well as the Govt. establishments can participate in the Mega Job Fair, it is recommended that the common / individual circular or invitations to the companies may mention about the relevant provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 regarding reservation of not less than 4% vacancies for persons with disabilities (only in Govt. establishments) and the Central Government’s scheme of National Award  and incentive for employment to private sector employers mentioned above.  It is also recommended to ensure that the venue of  the job fair is accessible to persons with disabilities and to facilitate easy and barrier free access to the Job Fair.  The Job Fair portal be also made accessible to persons with disabilities.

11.         The suggestion made by the complainant that the information about the joining of candidates of persons with disabilities and the status of their retention before the next job fair / in six months whichever is earlier, be also considered.

12.         Action taken on the above recommendations may be intimated to this Court within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

13.         The complaint is disposed off in terms of the above recommendations.

14.         Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 5th  day of January, 2018.     

           (T.D. Dhariyal )
                          State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


View the digitally signed PDF Order here:

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Dr. Ram Kishan Vs. Registrar, Ambedkar University | Case No. 4/1009/2015/Wel./CD/3657-58 | Dated:02.01.2018



              In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/1009/2015/Wel./CD/3657-58                   Dated:02.01.2018

In the matter of:

Dr. Ram Kishan,
R/o H. No. 224, Sarai Pipal Thala,
Near Adharsh Nagar,
Delhi-110033                                                                    ................ Petitioner

                                          Versus                         
Registrar,
Ambedkar University, Lothian Road,
Kashmere Gate,
Delhi-110006.                                                                  ………...…Respondent


                ORDER

          The above named complainant, a person with 40% locomotor disability filed a complaint dated 18.06.2015 regarding recruitment for the post of Professor (Disability Studies) in the School of Human Studies, Ambedkar University Delhi.  The matter was taken up with the respondent, the Registrar, Ambedkar University, Lothian Road, Kashmere Gate, Delhi.  The respondent submitted a reply dated 07.07.2015 which was forwarded to the complainant vide letter dated 14.07.2015.

2.      The complainant submitted his rejoinder dated 26.08.2015 following which hearings were held by former Commissioner on 22.09.2015 and 19.10.2015.  The respondent informed that the matter was before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi which was confirmed by the complainant on 13.12.2017.  As the matter is sub-judie, the complaint is closed.

3.           Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 02nd day of January, 2018.     

                                                                                       (T.D. Dhariyal )
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities