Saturday, October 5, 2019

Vishal Gupta Vs. Executive Engineer (Electrical) SDMC | Case No. 1006/1111/2019/07/6319-6320 | Dated: 04.10.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 1006/1111/2019/07/6319-6320                        Dated: 04.10.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Vishal Gupta,
J.E. (Electrical)/CNZ
F-21, St. No. 06, Brahmpuri,
Delhi 110053.                                                                 ........... Complainant

                                          Versus                           
The Executive Engineer (Electrical)
South Delhi Municipal Corporation,
SDMC Primary School,
Defence Colony,
New Delhi-110024.                                                         ........... Respondent

Last Date of Hearing     30.09.2019

Present:               Sh. Vishal Gupta, JE (E), complainant in person.
                             Sh. A.Z. Beg, Exe. Engineer (Electrical) and Sh. Kushal Chawla, AEE/CNZ for respondent.

ORDER

The above named complainant, a person with 54.9% hearing impairment vide his complaint dated 27.06.2019 submitted that he is working as Junior Engineer (Electrical) in South Delhi Municipal Corporation.  He had certain issues that made him mentally disturbed. He was under too much pressure and stress and was fearing termination of his services.  He felt harassed and resigned from the post of Jr. Engineer (Electrical)/CNZ. 

2.       The complainant addressed his representation to the Executive Engineer (Electrical), SDMC Primary School, Defence Colony, New Delhi with a copy to this Court and other officers/authorities in SDMC and Govt. of NCT of Delhi. 

3.       Vide letter dated 05.07.2019, an action taken report was sought from the respondent, who vide reply dated 19.07.2019, inter-alia submitted that the complainant was working as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on contract basis.  He never brought his problem to his notice before submitting the representation dated 27.06.2019.  He also did not mention anything about the allegations made in his representation when he submitted his resignation.  He told him that complainant was resigning as he wanted to prepare for competitive examinations for getting permanent Govt. job and he was not satisfied with his contractual job.  After receipt of the complaint, he personally inquired into the working of Sh. Kushal Chawla, Assistant Engineer from all other Junior Engineers (Electrical).  All of them strongly expressed their views that the allegations were found to be false and fabricated.  He also enclosed the explanation/comments dated 17.07.2019 of Sh Kushal Chawla (AEE) including a collective statement of seven Jr. Engineers working under him.  They stated that the working and behaviour of the Sh. Kushal Chawla has been very good, cordial and supportive and they have no complaint or any issues with him. 

4.       In his rejoinder dated 06.09.2019, the complainant submitted that he was not satisfied with the reply and he should be given an opportunity of a hearing.  He also submitted that he has requested for withdrawal of his resignation. 

5.       Upon considering the written submissions, a hearing was scheduled on 30.09.2019. After detailed interaction with the parties and perusal of record, it appeared that there had been some communication gap between the complainant and his immediate supervisor.  A copy of his resignation letter dated 11.06.2019 produced by the respondent, gives the personal reasons for resigning with effect from 30.06.2019 (Evening). The complainant has also thanked his seniors, staff and co-workers for their support.  The said resignation was accepted by Commissioner, SDMC vide order dated 24.07.2019. 

6.       The respondent submitted that as the complainant’s contract was coming to an end on 30.06.2019 and in view of his request for resignation w.e.f. the same date, an office order dated 07.08.2019 that the Commissioner, SDMC has terminated the contract of the complainant with effect from 30.06.2019 was issued.  They also clarified that there is no provision for withdrawal of resignation by an employee of contract once the resignation is accepted.  It is for the Competent Authority to consider his request.  He also submitted that he received an email dated 06.09.2019 from the complainant requesting to allow him to withdraw his resignation which he submitted under tremendous stress. He immediately informed the complainant that he should pursue the matter with ADC, Engineer/HQ/SDMC as his Division has no authority to take any action in the matter. 

7.       The complainant stated that he wants to continue working in SDMC as he submitted his resignation under stress. 

8.       It appears that complainant submitted his resignation in haste and due to some communication gap and misunderstanding. As his immediate superior officers including Sh. Kushal Chawla have no issue with regard to his working and no other person has been appointed/engaged in place of the complainant, it is recommended that Commissioner, SDMC may consider re-engaging the complainant as Jr. Engineer (Electrical) and have an action taken submitted to this Court within a month of receipt of this order or by 31.10.2019 whichever is earlier.

9.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 4th day of October, 2019.


             (T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


No comments:

Post a Comment