Showing posts with label Vending Licence for Persons with Disabilities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vending Licence for Persons with Disabilities. Show all posts

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Ruby Mishra Vs. Chairman New Delhi Municipal Council & Head Granthi, Bangla Sahib Gurudwara | Case No. 4/1628/2017-Wel./CD/4045-47 | Dated:31.01.2018




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 4/1628/2017-Wel./CD/4045-47                                         Dated:31.01.2018

In the matter of:

Smt. Ruby Mishra
Shop No-8, Bangla Sahaib Gurudwara,
VMCA, New Delhi-110001                                                ……................ Petitioner

                                          Versus                         
The Chairman,
New Delhi Municipal Council,
Palika Kendra Parliament Street,
New Delhi-110001                                                              ...………...…Respondent No.1

Head Granthi
Bangla Sahib Gurudwara
YMCA, New Delhi-110001                                                ………………Respondent No. 2

Date of Hearing  24.01.2018

Present:                   Smt. Ruby Mishra, Complainant.
Mr. N.L. Chawla, Jt. Director (Enforcement),   Ms. Harmeet Kaur, Advocate on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and 2 respectively.

ORDER
           
          The above named complainant, a person with 52% locomotor disability vide her complaint dated 04.05.2017 submitted that she is a social worker and she sells Tea, Bread Pakora on a small space at Bangla Sahib Gurudwara near YMCA.  The respondent no. 2 causes obstruction and she is being harassed for the last one year and gets her articles removed.  She is also threatened of police action.  The complainant also alleged malpractice and added that the small shop is the only source of her livelihood.  She has further submitted that many other people sell items from that area which belongs to NDMC.  While they are not disturbed, she is being harassed although she has a written order of Chairman, NDMC.

2.      The complaint was taken up with the respondents vide notice dated 03.07.2017.  Respondent No. 2 vide reply dated 03.07.2017 denied the allegations and submitted inter-alia that there are illegal constructions around the site of the Gurdwara.  Bad elements assemble near the shop and create nuisance for the visitors.  They are also using gas cylinder which is hazardous for the pilgrims visiting Gurudwara every day.  The Complainant has also occupied an area in an unauthorised manner.  Therefore, a letter was sent to the Chairman, NDMC and was approached for removal of the encroachment.  If the encroachment was not stopped the whole area including the Toilet Site of the Gurudwara would be occupied by unauthorized occupants. DSGMC and Gurudwara Rakab Ganj Sahib is receiving complaints all the time even from High Dignitaries and Advocates etc. who are visiting the Gurudwara regarding obstruction and nuisance created by unauthorized occupants.

3.      Respondent No. 2 further submitted that the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 under which the complaint has been filed by the complainant, no where mentions that the persons with disabilities will occupy the public premises, open shop and start business in an unauthorized manner.  The complainant is approaching this Court for sympathy and she may not be allowed to run the tea shop near Gurudwara.  There is no threat by Gurudwara Head Granthi for taking away the shop material of the complainant and deprivation of the rights of persons with disabilities.

4.      During the hearing on 24.01.2018, the complainant stated that she continues to sell the items from her stall.  However, the Health and Enforcement Department of NDMC had taken away her articles and imposed heavy fine, which should be reduced.

5.  The Ld. Counsel for respondent no. 2 reiterated the written submissions and added that the Head Granthi of Bangla Sahib Gurudwara, Gyani Ranjeet Singh has not removed any items of the vendors including the complainant.  Gurdwara is concerned only about safety and security of the visitors.

6.      The representative of NDMC submitted that Govt. of NCT of Delhi has given clearance for constitution of the Town Vending Committee (TVC) and a meeting has been scheduled on 24.01.2018 for implementing the orders of the GNCTD.  Once the TVC is constituted, the matter of the vendors with disabilities in NDMC area will be decided early by the TVC.

7.      The issues concerning the plight of vendors with disabilities in the NCT of Delhi have been discussed  while disposing of the complaints of a large number of persons with disabilities in case No. 4/1233/2016-Wel/CD.  Vide order dated 27.07.2017 in that case, one of the recommendations of this court is that persons with disabilities who were vending as on 13.09.2013 should not be disturbed and be allowed to earn their livelihood by selling various items.
 
8.      It is observed that the complainant applied for Tehbazari site vide application dated 30.11.2007 and has been vending since the year 2000.  She is thus, covered under para 5(i) of the said order dated 27.07.2017.  Therefore, as recommended in that order, she should not be disturbed and allowed to earn her livelihood by selling various articles. A copy of the order dated 27.07.2017 is enclosed with order for ready reference. 

9.      It is also observed that the complainant is in the list of 100 persons with disabilities who have applied for certificate of vending in NDMC area.  It is expected that TVC will decide her case considering her disability and gender. 

10.    The complaint is disposed off accordingly.

11.    Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 31st day of January, 2018.


(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities

Encl:  Copy of order dated 27.07.2017



Saturday, September 9, 2017

Mohammed Shabbir Ahmed Khan Vs. The Commissioner, EDMC | Case No. 4/1616/2017-Wel/CD/1759-60 | Dated: 08.09.2017

Case Summary:

Mohammed Shabbir Ahmed Khan Vs. The Commissioner, EDMC

Employment: Complainant’s kiosk was removed by MCD in his absence in June 2010, and the officers of the MCD on 15.07.10 assured this court that he would be allotted a shop in the near future but this hasn’t yet happened. He further submitted that he had received a receipt requiring him to pay Rs. 9000/- on account of encroachment. On contacting the complainant, he informed the court that he had no problem in running his kiosk but he requested that he should be given the license for the kiosk.
As a large number of persons with disabilities had filed complaints related with police stopping them from street vending and the case was pending in the High Court, this Court reiterated recommendations made in an order dated 27.10.17, ie; (1) Persons with disabilities vending as on 13.09.13 should not be disturbed and be allowed to continue vending (2) Persons with disabilities who applied for the vending license but was not granted it should not be denied vending rights on not being covered by “existing vendors” on 13.09.13, so long as they can produce proof of application. (3) Functionaries of Municipalities/Cantonment Board should be sensitized to deal with persons with disabilities, particularly while seizing and releasing their goods.


Order / Judgement: 


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]
  
Case No. 4/1616/2017-Wel/CD/1759-60                          Dated: 08.09.2017

In the matter of:                                

Sh. Mohammed Shabbir Ahmed Khan
A-39, Gali No. 1, Pahala Pusta,
New Usmanpur,
Delhi-110053                                                          ................ Complainant

                                          Versus      
                   
The Commissioner
East Delhi Municipal Corporation,
419, Udyog Sadan,
Patparganj Instl. Area,
Delhi-110096                                                         ………...…Respondent


Dates of Hearing:        06.09.2017

Present:                        Dr. M.L. Sharma, Asstt. Commissioner, Shahdara, North Zone, Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Labour Welfare Supdt. Shahdara South and Shahdara North on behalf of Respondent.

ORDER
         
          The above named complainant, a person with blindness vide his complaint received on 11.04.207 submitted that he is a R/o Khan Pan Masala, Pehla Pushta, Near Transformer New Usmanpur, Delhi-110053.  In June 2010 he informed this court that his shop (kiosk) was removed by MCD in his absence.  The officers of MCD on 15.07.2010 assured this court that he would be allotted a shop in near future.  However, he has not been allotted any shop till date.  He further submitted that on 07.04.2017 someone gave him a receipt which required him to be present at C-12, Main Yamuna Vihar Road, Maujpur, Delhi to pay Rs. 9000/- on account of encroachment which is to be deposited within 3 days.  The complaint was taken up with the respondent vide notice dated 06.06.2017 followed by reminder dated 27.07.2017.  As there was no response from the respondent, a hearing was scheduled on 06.09.2017 vide summons dated 28.08.2017.

2.      Dr. M.L. Sharma, Asstt. Commissioner, Shahdara, North Zone and Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Labour Welfare Supdt. Shahdara South and Shahdara North appeared and submitted that the details of the case have not so far reached them.  However allotments of kiosks, etc. is to be done as per the recommendation of the Town Vending Committees.  The matter is before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.  A copy of the complaint and the related papers were handed over to Dr. M.L. Sharma.

3.      As the complainant was not present, he was contacted on his given phone.  He submitted that he has gone to his Home Town in Muzzafarpur, Bihar.  He has no problem in running of his kiosk.  However, he requested that he should be given the licence for the shop/kiosk.

4.      A large number of persons with disabilities had filed complaints in connection with harassment by enforcement officials or denial of permission to earn their livelihoods through street vending.  All those the complaints were disposed of vide order dated 27.07.2017, a copy of which is enclosed.  In view of the fact that the representation in those cases concerned the livelihoods of a large number of persons with disabilities who face adverse situations on day-to-day basis and that the issue of constitution of the Town Vending Committees is before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi who are seized of the issues connected therewith, the following recommendations have been made:

“i.  The persons with disabilities, who were vending as on 13.09.2013, should not be disturbed and be allowed to earn their livelihood by selling various articles.

ii.  Persons with disabilities who fulfilled eligibility conditions and had applied for vending licence, allotment of kiosks etc. Before 13.09.2013 but were not issued the licence while those who applied after them, were given the licence, should not be denied vending right on the ground that their names do not exist in the list of registered vendors as they would have been covered under the ‘existing vendors’ as on 13.09.2013 had their applications been processed in time by the concerned Municipal authorities.  Such vendors should however produce the proof of having applied for the vending licence, allotment of kiosks, etc.

iii. The concerned functionaries of the Municipalities/Cantonment Board should be properly and adequately sensitised to deal with persons with disabilities with dignity, particularly while seizing and releasing their goods (perishable/non-perishable) which should be released within the prescribed time limit and be considerate in levying fines.”

5.      The case of the complainant may also be dealt in terms of the above mentioned recommendations of this Court vide order dated 27.07.2017.  The complaint is disposed of accordingly.

6.           Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 8th day of August, 2017.     

                                                                                          (T.D. Dhariyal)
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities



Rohtas Singh Vs. The Commissioner, EDMC | Case No. 4/1581/2017-Wel/CD/1761-62 | Dated: 08.09.2017

Case Summary:

Rohtas Singh Vs. The Commissioner, EDMC

Employment: Complainant submitted that he met with an accident and lost his right arm, losing all his property in his treatment and has no other means of livelihood than the kiosk at Anand Vihar Railway Station.

Court referenced recommendations made in Case No. 4/1233/2016-Wel/CD; (1) Persons with disabilities vending as on 13.09.13 should not be disturbed and be allowed to continue vending (2) Persons with disabilities who applied for the vending license but was not granted it should not be denied vending rights on not being covered by “existing vendors” on 13.09.13, so long as they can produce proof of application. (3) Functionaries of Municipalities/Cantonment Board should be sensitized to deal with persons with disabilities, particularly while seizing and releasing their goods.
Court enclosed a copy of the above order, and further noted that it is expected that the concerned officers would take a sympathetic view and let the complaint earn his livelihood lawfully and peacefully.


Order / Judgement: 


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 4/1581/2017-Wel/CD/1761-62            Dated: 08.09.2017

In the matter of:

Sh. Rohtas Singh
R/o A-29, First Floor, DLF,
Bhopura, Gaziabad,
Uttar Pradesh-201005                                             ................ Complainant

                                          Versus                          
The Commissioner
East Delhi Municipal Corporation,
419, Udyog Sadan,
Patparganj Instl. Area,
Delhi-110096                                                            ………...…Respondent

Dates of Hearing           06.09.2017

Present:                         Sh. Rohtas Singh, Complainant
Dr. M.L. Sharma, Asstt. Commissioner, Shahdara, North Zone, Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Labour Welfare Supdt. Shahdara South and Shahdara North on behalf of Respondent.

ORDER
         
The complaint dated 07.03.2017 of the above named complainant, a person with 89% locomotor disability which was received from the Court of Chief Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities vide letter dated 29.03.2017, was taken up with the respondent vide notice dated 31.05.2017 followed by a reminder dated 25.07.2017.  As there was no response from the respondent, a hearing was scheduled vide the summons dated 25.08.2017.

2.       None appeared on behalf of the respondent on 06.09.2017.  However, Dr. M.L. Sharma, Asstt. Commissioner, Shahdara, North Zone and Sh. Ritesh Kumar, Labour Welfare Supdt. Shahdara South and Shahdara North appeared in case No. 4/1616/2017-Wel/CD in Mohd. Shabbir Ahmed Khan Vs. Commissioner East Delhi Municipal Corporation.  They were requested to bring the matter to the notice of the concerned Dy. Commissioner/Asstt. Commissioner and to take appropriate action in the matter and submit a report by 19.09.2017.   Copies of the relevant papers of the case were also given to Dr. Sharma for handing over the concern Dy. Commissioner/Asstt. Commissioner. 

3.       The complainant reiterated his written submissions and stated that he met with an accident on 26.11.2012 and lost his right arm.  He lost all his property in his treatment and has no other means of livelihood than the kiosk at Anand Vihar Railway Station.  He submitted that he may be allowed to earn his livelihood as otherwise he and his family of 9 persons, would have no means of livelihood.

4.       This court vide order dated 27.07.2017 has made the following recommendations in case No. 4/1233/2016-Wel/CD in view of the fact that the representations in those cases concern the livelihoods of a large number of persons with disabilities who face adverse situations on day-to-day basis and that the issue of constitution of the Town Vending Committees is before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi who are seized of the issues connected therewith:
“ i.      The persons with disabilities, who were vending as on 13.09.2013, should not be disturbed and be allowed to earn their livelihood by selling various articles.
ii        Persons with disabilities who fulfilled eligibility conditions and had applied for vending licence, allotment of kiosks etc. Before 13.09.2013 but were not issued the licence while those who applied after them, were given the licence, should not be denied vending right on the ground that their names do not exist in the list of registered vendors as they would have been covered under the ‘existing vendors’ as on 13.09.2013 had their applications been processed in time by the concerned Municipal authorities.  Such vendors should however produce the proof of having applied for the vending licence, allotment of kiosks, etc.
iii       The concerned functionaries of the Municipalities/Cantonment Board should be properly and adequately sensitised to deal with persons with disabilities with dignity, particularly while seizing and releasing their goods (perishable/non-perishable) which should be released within the prescribed time limit and be considerate in levying fines.”

5.       A copy of the order dated 27.07.2017 is enclosed with this order.

6.       It is expected that the concerned officers would take a sympathetic view and let the complainant earn his livelihood in a lawful and peaceful manner.  The complainant is disposed off.

7.     Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 8th day of August, 2017.     

                                                                                          (T.D. Dhariyal)
                          State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities