Showing posts with label insulting abuse violence exploitation intimidating assaulting or use of force to person with disability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insulting abuse violence exploitation intimidating assaulting or use of force to person with disability. Show all posts

Saturday, June 9, 2018

Ms. Harjeet Gambhir Vs. DCP Shahdra | Case No. 4/1699/2017-WEL/CD/ 7736-38 | Dated: 08.06.2018


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/1699/2017-WEL/CD/ 7736-38          Dated: 08.06.2018
In the matter of:

Ms. Harjeet Gambhir,
125, Pratap Khand, Vishwakarma Nagar,
Jhilmil, Shahdara,
Delhi – 110 095.                                                 ……….Complainant            

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Shahdara.
Delhi – 110 032.                                               …………Respondent


         

ORDER

      The above named complainant vide her complaint dated nil, presented before the State Commissioner on 21.08.2017, submitted that her husband expired and her only son, Aman Gambhir is a person with 40-70% mental illness (Schizophrenia).  Her neighbour, Sh. Ram Kishore and his family members residing at 123, Pratap Khand harass her son and also sometimes beat him up. She also submitted that the said persons have also threatened to kill Aman.  Her son was too scared even to come out of the house.  She further submitted that she had also filed a complaint earlier and she wants that her above mentioned neighbour and his family members do not harass them.   
  

2.   The complaint was taken up with the respondent under the Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act,  vide notice dated 31.08.2017 bringing to the notice of the respondent the provisions under Sections 6, 7 and 89 to 92 of the Act.

3.   The respondent vide letter dated 3.10.2017 submitted as under:
“ an enquiry into the matter was got conducted through ACP/Vivek Vihar.  During enquiry, the statement of the complainant was recorded wherein she stated that her neighbour Ram Verma and his sons and daughter Rahul, Rohit and Anjali along with his wife Meena Verma used to threaten her son Aman and abused him.  Further she is wiling to keep them aside and do not want their interference.

During further enquiry, Ram Kishore and his family members were enquired wherein they stated that we are neighbours of Ms. Harjeet Gambhir whose only son Aman is mentally challenged and used to trouble them and in the same pretext his mother also trouble them.  She used to through the garbage in front of their house and disturb their sons and daughter.  Also, other neighbours of complainant, Naseem Ahmed and Parvez Khan stated that the same matter as stated by Ram Kishore Verma and his family members.  It is a dispute between both the neighbours and no cognizable offence is found to have occurred.  There is a possibility of breach of peace, preventive action vide DD No. 29 A dated 25.09.17 PS Vivek Vihar 107/50 Cr.PC is initiated made against both the parties”


4.   The complainant was contacted on telephone and informed about the contents of the report submitted by the respondent.  She informed that the situation has improved.  She however, submitted that she and her son should be provided necessary support by the police as and when required.


5.   It is reiterated that Section 6 of the Act inter-alia provides that the appropriate government shall take measures to protect persons with disabilities from being subjected to torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.  Section 7 of the said Act details specific measures for protecting from abuse, violence and exploitation and the action to be taken by a police officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know of any abuse, voidance or exploitation.  The said Section is reproduced below:-

“7. (1) The appropriate Government shall take measures to protect persons with disabilities from all forms of abuse, violence and exploitation and to prevent the same, shall—
(a) take cognizance of incidents of abuse, violence and exploitation and provide legal remedies available against such incidents;
(b) take steps for avoiding such incidents and prescribe the procedure for its reporting;
(c) take steps to rescue, protect and rehabilitate victims of such incidents; and
(d) create awareness and make available information among the public.
(2) Any person or registered organisation who or which has reason to believe that an act of abuse, violence or exploitation has been, or is being, or is likely to be committed against any person with disability, may give information about it to the Executive Magistrate within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such incidents occur.
(3) The Executive Magistrate on receipt of such information, shall take immediate steps to stop or prevent its occurrence, as the case may be, or pass such order as he deems fit for the protection of such person with disability including an order—
(a) to rescue the victim of such act, authorising the police or any organisation working for persons with disabilities to provide for the safe custody or rehabilitation of such person, or both, as the case may be;
(b) for providing protective custody to the person with disability, if such person so desires;
(c)  to provide maintenance to such person with disability.
(4) Any police officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know of abuse, violence or exploitation towards any person with disability shall inform the aggrieved person of

(a) his or her right to apply for protection under sub-section (2) and the particulars of the Executive Magistrate having jurisdiction to provide assistance;
(b) the particulars of the nearest organisation or institution working for the rehabilitation of persons with disabilities;
(c) the right to free legal aid; and
(d) the right to file a complaint under the provisions of this Act or any other law dealing with such offence:
Provided that nothing in this section shall be construed in any manner as to relieve the police officer from his duty to proceed in accordance with law upon receipt of information as to the commission of a cognizable offence.
(5) If the Executive Magistrate finds that the alleged act or behaviour constitutes an offence under the Indian Penal Code, or under any other law for the time being in force, he may forward the complaint to that effect to the Judicial or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, having jurisdiction in the matter.”
6.   The Act also provides for offences and penalties and the relevant Sections are also reproduced below:-
“89Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this Act, or of any rule made thereunder shall for first contravention be punishable with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and for any subsequent contravention with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.

92. Whoever,—
(a) intentionally insults or intimidates with intent to humiliate a person with disability in any place within public view;
(b) assaults or uses force to any person with disability with intent to dishonour him or outrage the modesty of a woman with disability;
(c) having the actual charge or control over a person with disability voluntarily or knowingly denies food or fluids to him or her;
(d) being in a position to dominate the will of a child or woman with disability and uses that position to exploit her sexually;
(e) voluntarily injures, damages or interferes with the use of any limb or sense or any supporting device of a person with disability;
(f) performs, conducts or directs any medical procedure to be performed on a woman with disability which leads to or is likely to lead to termination of pregnancy without her express consent except in cases where medical procedure for termination of pregnancy is done in severe cases disability and with the opinion of a registered medical practitioner and also with the consent of the guardian of the woman with disability,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to five years and with fine.”

7.   Office of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi vide Circular No. 28/2017 dated 25.10.2017 has also brought to the notice of all concerned in Delhi Police the provisions of the Act relating to the duties of police officers and the provision for offences and punishments for contravention/violation of any provision of the Act and has directed all the DCsP to take necessary action to make all the I.O.s aware of the provisions of the Act and to ensure its effective implementation.

8.   In light of the provisions of the Act and the situation of the complainant and her son, the respondent is advised to ensure that Sh. Aman Gambhir is not harassed/threatened/teased by any person and his rights are not infringed.  It is also recommended to organise awareness and sensitisation programmes among the members of civil society, if necessary, in consultation with the Social Welfare Department/District Social Welfare Officer concerned, Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

9.   The complainant may contact the concerned Police Station for assistance as and when required, who are expected to take appropriate measures to ensure that atrocities are not inflicted by anyone on Sh. Aman Gambhir and his rights are not infringed.

10.  The complaint is disposed off.

11. Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 08th day of June, 2018.    


(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


                  Copy to :


The Secretary (Social Welfare), Govt. of NCT of Delhi, GLNS Complex, Delhi Gate, New Delhi – 110002, for extending necessary support in organizing awareness and sensitization programmes.

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Jugal Kishore Vs. Commissioner Delhi Police | Case No. 42/1111/2017/11/6911-12 | Dated: 24.04.2018



In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 42/1111/2017/11/6911-12                                    Dated: 24.04.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Jugal Kishore
510/7, Ashok Mohalla,
Nangloi, Delhi-110005                                        ................ Petitioner

                                                          Versus                              
The Commissioner,
Delhi Police,
MSO Building,
I.T.O, Delhi-110002.                                         ………...…Respondent

Date of Hearing:    14.03.2018 and 23.04.2018

Present:                 Ms. Preeti, Complainant.
ASI Dharambir Singh, on behalf of Respondent.
  
ORDER

          The above named complainant, father of Ms. Kiran, a person with 79% moderate mental retardation with mild hypertonia with right hemiparesis, vide his complaint dated 24.11.2017 submitted inter alia that he and his brothers/other family members have a property dispute which is before the Tis Hazari Court.  He also alleged that his brothers and their families abuse him and his other family members including his younger daughter Ms. Kiran who is a person with disability.  They torture her due to which she gets fits. 

2.       The complaint was taken up with the respondent vide Notice dated 30.11.2017 followed by reminder dated 27.12.2017.  As there was no response, a hearing was scheduled on 14.03.2018.  During the hearing, the complainant submitted a CD containing the video clips alongwith, its transcript dated 01.12.2017, 07.12.2017, 20.02.2017, 04.03.2017 and some photographs in support of his allegations.  In his rejoinder dated 27.01.2018 the complainant also alleged delayed action by the police and submitted that had the police officials taken action against the culprits in time, further violence/criminal case against his daughter with mental retardation would not have happened.  He also submitted that the police parties cannot absolve themselves of the responsibility by saying that a civil dispute is pending before the Court and no police action is warranted. 

3.       During the hearing, the representative of the respondent vide status report dated 13.03.2018 submitted that the complainant and other parties namely Mukesh Kumar and others have a family property dispute which is before the Tis Hazari Court.  Action U/s. 41.1(C) Cr. P.C has also been taken against the brother of the complainant Sh. Rajesh Kumar. 

4.       The complainant reiterated his written submissions and alleged that he was not getting the protection of police. 

5.       On going through the CD containing the video clips submitted by the complainant, it was observed that the accused was seen using abusive language and threatening the complainant and his family members. 

6.       Vide ROP dated 15.03.2018, it was brought to the notice of the respondent that the complaint was taken up as the complainant had alleged that his brother Sh. Rajesh Kumar and his other brother and their families hurl abuses and indulge in obscene activities and torture his daughter Ms. Kiran who is a person with 79% disability. 

7.       As the status report did not address the issues relating to the abuse, violence and exploitation of Ms. Kiran by the accused, the concerned officer at Police Station, Nangloi under the respondent was directed to investigate the matter and ascertain whether Ms. Kiran, daughter of the complainant was being abused, subjected to violence and exploitation by the accused persons.  It was also advised that assistance of a rehabilitation professional trained to handle persons with intellectual disability (mental retardation) may be taken to interact with Ms. Kiran and a report be submitted to this court by 16.04.2018 with a copy to the Executive Magistrate having jurisdiction of the area and the complainant.  On receipt of the report, the Executive Magistrate should take immediate steps to stop or prevent the abuse, violence, exploitation, etc. of Ms. Kiran.  Attention was also drawn to the circular no. 28/2017 dated 25.10.2017 Office of the Commissioner of Police Delhi vide which all the DCsP have been directed to take necessary action to make the IOs aware of the provisions of Section 7(4) of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.

The said Section 7 provides as under:
“7. (1) The appropriate Government shall take measures to protect persons with disabilities from all forms of abuse, violence and exploitation and to prevent the same, shall—
(a) take cognizance of incidents of abuse, violence and exploitation and provide legal remedies available against such incidents;
(b) take steps for avoiding such incidents and prescribe the procedure for its reporting;
(c) take steps to rescue, protect and rehabilitate victims of such incidents; and
(d) create awareness and make available information among the public.
(2) Any person or registered organisation who or which has reason to believe that an act of abuse, violence or exploitation has been, or is being, or is likely to be committed against any person with disability, may give information about it to the Executive Magistrate within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such incidents occur.
(3) The Executive Magistrate on receipt of such information, shall take immediate steps to stop or prevent its occurrence, as the case may be, or pass such order as he deems fit for the protection of such person with disability including an order—
(a) to rescue the victim of such act, authorising the police or any organisation working for persons with disabilities to provide for the safe custody or rehabilitation of such person, or both, as the case may be;
(b) for providing protective custody to the person with disability, if such person so desires;
(c) to provide maintenance to such person with disability.
“(4) Any police officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know of abuse, violence or exploitation towards any person with disability shall inform the aggrieved person of—
(a) his or her right to apply for protection under sub-section (2) and the particulars of the Executive Magistrate having jurisdiction to provide assistance;
(b) the particulars of the nearest organisation or institution working for the rehabilitation of persons with disabilities;
(c) the right to free legal aid; and
(d) the right to file a complaint under the provisions of this Act or any other law dealing with such offence:
Provided that nothing in this section shall be construed in any manner as to relieve the police officer from his duty to proceed in accordance with law upon receipt of information as to the commission of a cognizable offence”.

8.       On the next date of hearing on 23.04.2018, the representative of the respondent submitted the status report dated 23.04.2018 as per which a criminal case has been registered against Sh. Mukesh, uncle of Ms. Kiran, Smt. Rakhi, Aunt, Sh. Chiranji Lal, another uncle and others vide FIR No. 102/18 u/s. 323/506/509/34 IPC and Section 92 of Right of Persons with Disability Act of the statement of Ms. Kiran daughter of the complainant.  It has further been stated that the victim was produced before the Hon’ble MM Court and her statement was recorded u/s. 164 Cr. P.C.  The charge sheet has been prepared and sent for scrutiny to Prosecution Branch, Tis Hazari on 16.04.2018.  As per the report, the charge sheet will be sent for trial shortly.  The respondent has further submitted that in view of the breach of peace among the brothers, Kalandra u/s. 107/150 CrPC has already sent before SEM, Outer District, Pitampura, New Delhi with request for obtaining bond of good behaviour of the parties.  Respondent also enclosed a copy of the FIR dated 28.03.2018.  The representative of the respondent added that the proceedings are likely to start in the Court of MM, Tis Hazari within a week to 10 days.

 9.      Ms. Preeti, sister of Ms. Kiran submitted that the family members of her uncles continue commenting on her sister using derogatory language. 

10.     As the FIR has already been registered and the victim has been produced before the Hon’ble MM Court and her statement has been recorded in pursuance to the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and other relevant laws, the complainant may bring any further instances of abuse, violence or exploitation etc. towards Ms. Kiran to the notice of the concerned police station and Executive Magistrate who will take appropriate action under the provisions of the said Act. 

11.     While considering this case, the concerned Executive Magistrate may also take note of the provisions of Section 89 and 92 of the Rights of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 which provide for punishment for contravention of the provisions of the said Act or rules or regulations made thereunder and for punishment for offences and atrocities against persons with disabilities respectively.  SHO, P.S. Nangloi shall intimate this Court as soon as the charge sheet is sent for trial, in any case by 08.05.2018.  

12.     The complaint is disposed off accordingly.

13.     Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 24th day of April, 2018.     

                                                                           (T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Friday, January 19, 2018

Sonu Bhola Vs. DCP (East District), Delhi Police | Case No. 4/469/2013-Wel/CD/3916-17 | Dated:18.01.2018



In the Court of Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the Persons with Disabilities
(Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995]

Case No. 4/469/2013-Wel/CD/3916-17                                           Dated:18.01.2018

In the matter of:

Sh.Sonu Bhola,
S/o Jagan Nath,
R/o A-89, Street No.8,
Jagat Puri, Krishna Nagar,
Delhi-110051.                                                                            .....Complainant     

                                                                      Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Police (East),
East District,
I.P. Extension, Patpar Ganj, Institutional Area,
Mandawali Fazalpur,
Delhi-110092.                                                                               ...... Respondent

Present:                         None
Date of hearing:           16.01.2018 
           
ORDER

                  The above named complainant,  a person with locomotor disability vide his complaint dated 29.07.2013 submitted inter alia that his wife gave birth to a baby boy on 01.07.2013 in Ashok Nursing Home (ANH), Krishna Nagar, Delhi.  He was informed by ANH that since the baby boy was low weight i.e. 1.98 Kg, there was need for the child to stay in hospital for few days to manage the treatment.  On 4th July, 2013 ANH informed the complainant that the baby is serious and needs treatment at higher centre.  ANH discharged the baby and the complainant’s wife (patient) without giving the complete referral document.  The complainant tried to admit the baby in Shanti Mukund, Max Balaji, Kalawati Saran and Gangaram Hospitals one by one, but each hospital denied to admit him.  Finally, he admitted the baby in Holy family Hospital (HFH).  The doctors at HFH were struggling hard to know the exact problem with the baby in absence of the good referral documents.  On 9th July, 2013 the complainant reached ANH to collect the medical treatment history or case summary of the baby.  Since ANH was not providing the case summary of the baby, the complainant had to call the police through help line No. 100. The PCR van came at around 4.30 PM and Sh. Shive Kumar, IO, PS Krishna Nagar, East District was informed the full situation and the requirement of the documents from AMH.  Thereafter, the IO had a meeting with the people of ANH in the room.  The complainant has alleged that the IO ignored his request and did not help him in getting the case summary/medical treatment documents of the baby from ANH.  It has been also alleged by the complainant that till date Sh. Shive Kumar, IO, Delhi Police has not contacted him even a single time to know the status of his baby and he had not shared any development over the complaint of getting the medical history of his child.  His baby is still struggling at HFH.  The complainant has requested to take some concrete and possible action in the matter at the earliest. 

2.               As there was no information about the conclusion of the investigation by the Police and also the complainant had not followed up the case for long, a hearing was scheduled on 16.01.2018.  Neither the complainant nor the representative of the respondent appeared. The complainant was, however, contacted on his given mobile number 9213953775 and he stated that although his full address was not mentioned in the notice, he did not want to pursue the matter and it be closed.

3.               As the claims and counter claims of the parties have been investigated by the Police and the complainant has not alleged any harassment at this stage, the complaint is closed.

4.               It is however, brought to the notice of the parties that the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 provides for protection to persons with disabilities from abuse, violence and exploitation.   Section 7 of the said act also mandates the appropriate government to take measures to protect persons with disabilities from all forms of abuse, violence and exploitation and to take various measures to prevent the same. Section 7(4) also provides for action to be taken by a Police Officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know about abuse, violence or exploitation towards any person with disability.  Office of the Commissioner of Police: Delhi vide Circular No.28/2017 dated 25.10.2017 has directed all District DCsP to take necessary action to make IOs aware of the provisions of the Rights of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and to ensure its effective implementation. A copy of the said circular is enclosed.  It may be ensured that the complainant, who is a person with disability is not deprived of his legitimate rights.

3.             The matter is disposed off accordingly.

4.               Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 18th  day of January,2018.     



Encl: As above.                                                                                         (T.D. Dhariyal)
                                        State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities