Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Simmi Chopra Vs. The MS, Safdarjung Hospital & 2 Others | Case No.106/1121/2018/02/6215-20 | Dated: 19.03.2018




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25-D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-110002
Phone: 011-23216003-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Summons to appear u/s 82 of the RPwD Act, 2016


Case No.106/1121/2018/02/6215-20                             Dated: 19.03.2018       

In the matter of:

Ms. Simmi Chopra
B-123, Amar Colony
Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi -110004                                   .............Petitioner

Versus

The Medical Superintendent
Safdarjung Hospital
New Delhi -110029                                                ...............Respondent No.1

The Medical Superintendent
Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Pitampura, Delhi -110034                                     ...............Respondent No. 2

The Secretary
Health & Family Welfare Department
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
9th Level, A-Wing, I.P. Estate, Delhi Secretariat
New Delhi -110002                                               ...............Respondent No. 3

Date of Hearing: 09.03.2018
Present: Dr. Sanghamitra, Neurology Department, Dr. Rahul Saha, Psychiatry Department, Dr. Diganta Borah, PMR Department, Simmi Chopra, Complainant, Dr. Aman Pratap Singh, Paediatrics, BMH Hospital


ORDER

           
The above named complainant vide her email dated 11.02.2018 informed that she has been trying to get a disability certificate for her son, Master Manith Chopra since 02.03.2017.  The disability certificate is required for his admission to a school which are likely to commence shortly.  She further submitted that the family is the permanent resident of Rani Bagh but they are residing at Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar in a rented house for the last two years as there are better facilities in South Delhi. 

2.         She got Master Manith assessed by National Institute for Intellectual Disability, Noida and approached Safdarjung Hospital with the Aadhaar Card having Rani Bagh address as address proof. As per Government of NCT of Delhi notification, Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura is the notified hospital for issuing disability certificate to the residents of Rani Bagh.  But that hospital does not have a Psychiatrist.  So she was directed to IHBAS.   As the child has multiple disabilities, IHBAS could not issue disability certificate.

3.         Not knowing what to do next, the complainant visited this court.  It was observed that the Government Notification does not preclude assessment and certification by a hospital in whose jurisdiction a person is residing on temporary basis.  Therefore, Dr. R.K. Wadhwa of PMR Department, Safdarjung Hospital was contacted who advised the complainant to visit the hospital with all the papers on 23.02.2018.

4.         It was observed that the complainant had been trying to get a disability certificate for her son for nearly one year and had approached the Offices of the Hon’ble Chief Minister, Dy. Chief Minister and Health Minister through email.  Her emails had also been forwarded to Pr. Secretary and other officers of Health and Social Welfare Department on 07.02.2018.  It is also observed that complaints about difficulty in getting disability certificates, doubts about the jurisdiction of hospitals, unavailability of specialists, doctors, etc.  are often received by this court. 

5.         The complaint was taken up with the concerned authorities vide show-cause-cum hearing notice dated 16.02.2018. The respondents were directed to submit their versions by 28.02.2018 and to appear for hearing on 09.03.2018.  The complainant was separately advised to intimate this court the updates as she visits the hospitals/authorities to know and understand the problems faced in obtaining the disability certificate. 

6.         M.S. (MCH/Coord.), Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital vide her letter dated 28.02.2018 informed, “Master Manith Chopra, 3 years 6 month old reported in Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital for issuance of Disability Certificate on 08.02.2018.  The patient was examined in this hospital and after the clinical assessment it was found that the patient is a case of “Cerebral Palsy with Mental Retardation”.  As the Department of Neurology is not available in this hospital and as per Gazette Notification No. 23, Parth IV, NCTD No. 240 dated 12th February, 2014 (copy enclosed) for the patients of ‘Mental Retardation/illness and other Neurological Disorders/ Cerebral Palsy etc.”Residing in East, North West and North Districts of Delhi, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) Delhi is notified as Medical Authority for issuing Disability Certificate.  

After discussing the matter with Dr. Suman Kushwaha of IHBAS on 22.02.2018, the patient was referred to IHBAS for issuance of Disability Certificate in respect of Master Manith S/o Ms. Simmi Chopra, as the patient is resident of North West Delhi as per record.”

7.         Safdarjung Hospital, vide letter dated 5.3.2018 informed that the complainant may be directed to attend the PMR-OPD with Master Manith on any working day between 9.00 a.m. to 11.30 a. m for getting disability certificate.  

8.         No response was received from Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, the Respondent No. 3.

9.         During the hearing on 09.03.2018, the complainant submitted that while adequate assistance/cooperation was forthcoming at Safdarjung Hospital and she will also be getting the disability certificate in a few days, she felt that the process of assessment and certification of disability should be made friendly and streamlined especially in respect of persons who have multiple disabilities.  She also pointed out that it takes a lot of time to get the OPD slip in various departments which is extremely difficult for parents of such children.

10.       Representatives from all the relevant Departments of Safdarjung Hospital namely PMR, Neurology and Psychiatrist appeared and informed that Master Manith Chopra has been assessed by the Paediatrics, PMR and Psychiatry Department.  He is likely to be issued a disability certificate within a week by the Medical Record Department (MRD).  However, they expressed that there is an urgent need for rationalisation of area wise allocation of hospitals, ensuring availability of specialists and detailed instructions about the essential documents required to be submitted and their dissemination etc. 

11.       Dr. Amar Pratap Singh, Specialist, Paediatrics of Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital submitted that since Master Manith had multiple disability and there is no  Psychiatrist in that hospital, he had to advise the complainant to visit IHBAS as per the assigned jurisdiction for assessment and issuance of disability certificate.  

12.       Oblivions of the plight of the complainant and huge problems the hapless persons with disabilities and their family members are facing in getting disability certificates, none appeared on behalf of Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of NCT of Delhi, the nodal Department for the purpose. This is a matter of serious concern which should be addressed by Principal Secretary, Health on top priority.  This has happened despite the fact that this court vide order dated 05.03.2018 in Sh. B.G. Sarkar V/s Medical Superintendant, IHBAS has made detailed recommendations to Health & Family Welfare Department to take appropriate action to streamline the process of assessment and certification of disabilities as the complainant in that case also had to suffer a lot and is yet to be issued a proper disability certificate. The said recommendations are reproduced below: -

“(i)        Department of Health and Family Welfare is advised to convene a medical authority at JSS to assess and issue a certificate of multiple disability in respect of Ms. Neeta Sarkar in Form-VI within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.
(ii)        Residents of many localities are not able to identify their district and the nominated hospital.  It is often very confusing even for this court to guide them properly.  Some areas/districts have more than two nominated hospitals. Therefore, a person should have the choice to get the assessment and disability certificate from the nearest notified hospital from his /her residence (not necessarily from the place of permanent address)
(iii)       A map demarcating the areas falling under the jurisdiction of a nominated hospital should be uploaded in the websites of Department of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Social Welfare and every nominated hospital.  Necessary instructions in this regard to the concerned hospitals may be issued.
(iv)       In case of shortage of specialists, medical authorities for multiple disabilities may comprise doctors/experts from other hospital(s) who may assemble at one hospital on given dates for assessment of certification.  
(v)        Provision for link specialist from the same or other hospital in case of unavailability of a specialist should be made.
(vi)       Camps in each district should be organised regularly till all the persons with Disabilities have been issued the disability certificates.
(vii)      Clear instructions should be issued /mentioned in the notification   that the treating hospital shall issue the disability certificate if the person is under treatment for the condition.”                                                                                                   
13.      The complainant vide her email dated 15.03.2018 informed that Safdarjung Hospital has issued a certificate of 77% disability (Multiple disability) in respect of Master Manith on 14.03.2018.  As advised, she has also emailed the account of her experience in getting the disability certificate for her son which is reproduced below:

“There is no clear listing of hospitals of your area & whatever information is available online is outdated & it keeps on changing, so we had to visit 7 hospitals post which we were able to find out the hospital designated for our area, as each hospital kept on redirecting us to others.

At last we found that Vardhman Mahavir Hospital (Safdarjung) is the one who issues certificate for Amar Colony. Thereafter1 it has been a harassing process and there is no clear conclusion in sight. My husband I have had to take leave from work for the past month. My child - whether he is sick or not has to be subjected to this repeated trauma. Nobody has the correct info and as he has had a brain MRI at birth he is always going to need support. How does a 40% disability become relevant in his case? We are worried that though there is a quota in the school admission application we run the risk of missing it.

Day
Date
Location
Duration
Procedure
1
16-Jan-18
NIMH, Noida
8 hours
After getting guidance by Safdarjung Hospital, we visited NIMH and were surprised to see Nobody is aware that we have to get an assessment for the disability certificate. Again after waiting for 45 mins we took the OPD slip and was informed that it will take couple of hours for the assessment. We started the assessments at around 10.00 am in the morning with our kid. There were 5 assessments including physical, speech, social, psychological and social.  It was already 3.30 pm when we finished all the assessment expect the last one which was the psychological assessment. The child was already half asleep in our lap and suddenly the assessment trainee started asking the child questions which he already answered in the previous assessment. When we told them, the child is half asleep so they said to come again another day and do the assessment again.  That was really a harassment since we came around 9.00 in the morning and still no result.

2
17-Jan-18
NIMH, Noida
2 hours
We went again to the hospital and finally we got the assessment done for our child which was one of the document which was to be submitted for the final disability certificate.
3
18-Jan-18
Safdarjung Hospital, Safdarjung
1 hour
We went again to Safdarjung hospital and enquired about the application that how can we get the certificate now since we have done the assessment already and now is looking for a disability certificate. We were told to come on Friday because that is the day the board consisting of panel of doctors examine and release the certificate. On enquiring about the timing, we were informed to come by 9.00 in the morning. 
4
19-Jan-18
Safdarjung Hospital, Safdarjung
2 hours
We went on the following Friday assuming this would be the last step of getting our certificate. We went inside so first the staff said you have come very early for the board. The board will sit after lunch.  The lady of the staff asked for our documents, after showing our documents which included birth Certificate of the child, Aadhar Card, Parents Aadhar Card and rent agreement (we are on rent at Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar). The lady of the staff denied to present our case to the board, asking the reason we were shocked and scattered that we are at a rented place so we need to go to the hospital near to our permanent address. Now that was really shocking! We immediately went to the doctor (the head of PMR) cabin who agreed to issue the certificate earlier. He also denied now and told us to go to Ambedkar Hospital near Rohini. After losing all our hopes, we went to Ambedkar Hospital again to start the process but first to understand their process. 
5
22-Jan-18
Ambedkar Hospital, Pitampura
2 hours
We went to Ambedkar Hospital and there we again started up with taking the OPD slip. After meeting the doctor we came to know that this hospital can only make certificate by means of the mental assessment done at NIMH. They will not do any physical assessment of the child. We told them that this is the case of physical and mental disability both. So they sent us to Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital to get the physical and mental assessment both with certificate. 
6
06-Feb-18
Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura
4 hours
We went to Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, after taking the OPD slip we went to the Disability Counter. There they denied making the certificate because they said they do not have any Neuro pediatrician.  They referred us to IHBAS wherein they said to again do the mental assessment. I requested them to take the NIMH report which is the same assessment report but from a central government hospital. They strictly denied. I went to the Medical Superintendent. I requested her to accept the same report from NIMH but she denied and said we will only accept the Delhi government certificate / assessment report. 
7
09-Feb-18
Email

We launched a complaint to respected CM sir about what we are facing. 
8
12-Feb-18
IHBAS, Dilshad Gardern
6 hours
I went to IHBAS to do the same assessment again which I did in NIMH. They did not encouraged to make the report since it is a central government report and we have to the same assessment of the child again. They said to give the appointment but I requested that since the test is the same so why u want to again assess the child. They accepted the NIMH report and based on the same report they gave me the report on IHBAS letterhead. On the same day, I went to Mahavir thinking that my problems are solved now. I met with the MS and told her that please suggest the next procedure and let me know what are the next steps. She said she doesn’t know the procedure and the doctors are not available today. So suggested me to come again.
9
14-Feb-18
Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura
3 hours
I went again to the doctor and firstly the staff sitting outside said that I am not allowed to enter till the time I do not get the current date on the OPD slip. I again waited for 2 hours to get the date on my OPD slip. When I got the current date in the OPD, the doctor went on a meeting and was not available.
10
20-Feb-18
Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura
4 hours
This time I went to the MS as I got a call from the Nodal officer to go and speak to her. She referred me to another doctor since the same doctor was again not available.  The next doctor referred me to a physiotherapist now to get the physical assessment done for my child. When I asked them that I have already done the mental assessment from IHBAS, so now why again the hospital has to do physical assessment. They said it’s the procedure. I also requested them that I have my child today with me so if they can do it now. They said it is only done my appointment basis. So we have to visit on Thursday.
11
22-Feb-18
Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura & Commisioner office, Mata Sundari Lane
6 hours
We went to the hospital at 9.00 am in the morning and started with physical assessment as advised by the doctor on 20-02-18. It took around 1 hour to do the assessment. After getting the assessment done, we again went to the same paediatrician and he denied making the certificate stating that the hospital doesn’t have nuero paediatrician.  We went to meet MS and asked her if she could help as she was the one who called us today without any delay to make our certificate. She called the team of doctors and went into a meeting. After 2 hours, we were called at the MS office. The MS said she has just enquired and our certificate will be made by IHBAS. She also took an appointment for us in IHBAS for further process.
We, the suffered parents called the deputy commissioner for the persons with disability and told us our story. He immediately called us to his office. We went to his office and told him the whole process which we have gone through. He noted our details and sent us to the commissioner for persons with disability. We went there and met the commissioner. As we already emailed our case to him earlier, he recognised us. He told us that he has noted the case already and we have a hearing on 9th March 2018. Meanwhile he also called IHBAS to understand if we could get the certificate from there. IHBAS doctors also said the same thing that they do not have paediatrician who can make the certificate. By the help of commissioner, we were arranged to meet doctor in Safdarjung for our certificate the next day.
12
23-Feb-18
Safdarjung Hospital, Safdarjung
5 hours
Today at 9 in the morning we went to Safadarjung and met the person allotted by the commissioner for our case. He made the OPD slip for us and we met the doctor of PMR department. He said we have to undergo checkups with paediatrician, psychiatric department then they will take our papers for further process. We have been given a time for Wednesday 130pm for next checkups.
13
28-Feb-18
Safdarjung Hospital, Safdarjung
1 hour
Today we were called at around 130pm, we went at the hospital but due to strike in the hospital the hospital was locked from inside and no one was suppose to go inside. We were not able to contact anyone.
14
14-Mar-18
Safdarjung Hospital, Safdarjung
3 hours
The board checked Manith Chopra, and we waited for 2 hours to get the certificate. We were informed that certificate has been made but the doctor has forgotton his stamp. So they have called us tommorrow again to take the certificate.
15
15-Mar-18
Safdarjung Hospital, Safdarjung
1 hour
Finally we have got the certificate, thanks to you sir for making it happen.”
                 
14.       In light of the issues that have come to fore in this case and other cases, it is once again recommended that Pr. Secretary, Health and Family Welfare should take immediate action and issue detailed guidelines and directives on the process of assessing and issuing of disability certificates by various hospitals/certifying authorities in the NCT of Delhi so that persons with disabilities and their family members are able to get the disability certificates within the time frame prescribed in the Rules and they are not harassed. It is important to do so on top priority as the admissions to schools in Delhi have already started and in a few months, admission to colleges and universities will also commence and many young people with disabilities would approach the hospitals for certificate of disability.

15.       This court be informed of the action taken on the above recommendations within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 20 16.  

16.        The complaint is disposed off accordingly.

17.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 19th day of March, 2018.


(T.D. DHARIYAL)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
Copy to:
1.    Pr. Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of NCT of Delhi, 9th Level, Delhi Secretariat, I.P. Estate, New Delhi -110002.

2.    Secretary, Social Welfare Department, GLNS Complex, Feroze Shah Kotla Ground, Delhi Gate, New Delhi -110002, for information and necessary action.


           

           
           

Saturday, March 17, 2018

Dr. Satendra Singh Vs. Delhi & District Cricket Association | Case No. 4/967/2015-Wel./CD/6183-86A | Dated: 16.03.2018




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/967/2015-Wel./CD/6183-86A               Dated: 16.03.2018

In the matter of:

Dr. Satendra Singh,
Coordinator Enabling Unit,
University of Delhi,
Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital,
New Delhi-110095.                                              .……… Complainant     

                                                   Versus

The Hon.General Secretary/ President,
Delhi & District Cricket Association,
Ferozshah Kotla Ground,
New Delhi-110002.                                                  …...…Respondent


ORDER

                  The above named complainant, a person with 70% locomotor disability vide his complaint dated 29.04.2015  submitted that the Feroz Shah Kotla Cricket Stadium is not accessible for persons with disabilities.  They cannot enjoy equal access to entertainment, recreation and leisure.  The complainant also submitted that he could not watch IPL T20 and  other cricket matches to be held at that venue.  He specifically pointed out that the stadium has huge steps without side railings, there is no separate queue for spectators with disabilities and there are no reserved parking, seats and accessible toilets.  He made the following suggestions :

(i)           Reserve seats for people with disabilities in the stadium.  These seats should be wheelchair accessible as well.  The companion seat should be given so that people with disabilities are not isolated from other spectators or their friends or family. 
(ii)         There should be reserved accessible parking for people with disabilities close to the entrance gate or a special gate should be earmarked.
(iii)        The path to the stadium and seat should be accessible so that even a wheelchair user can move independently.  Access routes should be either levelled or have the shallowest possible gradient.  Any route or part of a route steeper than 1:20 should conform to the recommendations for ramped access.
(iv)        The toilets should be made accessible.
(v)         There should be lift to reach all vertical levels and ramped access for horizontal access.
(vi)        A dedicated officer should be assigned to look into any problem  a spectator with disability may have during the duration of the match and his contact number should be given on all reserved tickets allotted for spectators with disabilities.
(vii)      Exit should be separate for spectators with disabilities

2.           The complaint was taken up with the Chief Administrator, Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA)  vide communication dated 01.05.2015 with the directions to submit comments. 

3.           The respondent  vide reply dated 20.05.2015 and 08.02.2015 submitted that the DDCA is a  Company  registered  under the Companies Act 1956.  Hence the complaint was not maintainable.  It was neither Govt./State nor Local Authority as held by the Hon’ble Supreme court in the matter of Dalco Engineering Private Ltd. Vs Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye and Others (2010).  The respondent further submitted that despite being a Private Company it has made suitable arrangements for convenience of persons with disabilities. However, at any given point of time in a match atleast 35000 spectators occupy the ground / stands. Consequently,  it becomes difficult to manage the affairs.  Sufficient temporary arrangements for disabled friendly toilets are also made during the matches.  However, the entire premises cannot be made disabled friendly due to financial and other constraints.

4.           The then Chief Administrator Sh. Pradeep Kr. Banerjee vide his letter dated 12.10.2015  also submitted that he is a mere employee of the DDCA and only the Director of the Company or the President / General Secretary of DDCA would  be in a position to represent the  DDCA.  Therefore, a number of communications were also addressed to the Director, DDCA and subsequently to Joint Secretary/President, DDCA.

5.           The then Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities also heard the parties on 24.06.2015, 10.08.2015, 05.10.2015, and 09.11.2015. As there were no updates, the summons to appear U/S 82 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act (the Act) which came into force w.e.f. 19th April, 20017 was  issued on 23.10.2017.     In the said summons, the attention of the respondent was drawn to Section 46 of the Act  which provides that the service provider whether Government or private shall provide services in accordance with the rules on accessibility formulated by the Central Govt. under Section 40 within a period of two years from the date of notification of such rules.  It was also brought to the notice of the respondent that the Rule 15 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules,  2017 notified by Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities) vide notification dated 15.06.2017,  provides that the standard for public buildings as specified in the ‘Harmonised Guidelines and Space Standards for Barrier Free Built Environment for Persons with Disabilities and Elderly persons’ as issued by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Urban Development in  2016 shall be complied by every establishment. The matter was scheduled for hearing on 14.11.2017.

6.           Although the main Counsel  Sh. Saurabh Chadda was not available during the hearing, in view of the fact that the case was pending since May 2015, the respondent was advised that an access audit of the stadium by persons who are trained in Access Audit should be conducted to begin with.  All  provisions that are necessary to enable persons with disabilities to access the stadium and other facilities in accordance with the guidelines notified by the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities should be made accessible to persons with disabilities.  

7.           On the next date of hearing on 11.01.2018,   the main Counsel of the respondent was again not available.  Vide RoP dated 12.01.2018 in view of mandatory provisions of the Act on the subject, the respondent was directed to take immediate action to conduct an accessibility audit of the stadium and submit a report by 25.01.2018 and the matter was scheduled for hearing on 08.02.2018.

8.      On 08.02.2018, Sh. Rohit Bhagat Proxy Counsel of the respondent submitted that an  affidavit of compliance of the directions vide Record of Proceedings dated 11.01.2018 had been prepared but the same was awaiting signature of the authorised officer in DDCA.  The affidavit would  be filed in a few days.   

9.      The complainant who was heard on telephone suggested that a joint visit of the stadium by him, Civil Engineer and a representative of this Court should be organised to ensure that provisions of appropriate facilities for persons with disabilities are as per the prescribed standards.

10.         The respondent was  directed to arrange a visit of the stadium by a Team comprising the complainant, who has experiential knowledge of Access Audit besides bring a person with disability, the concerned Civil Engineer of DDCA and other officials as deemed fit and an officer from this court on any mutually convenient date between 15.02.2018 and 28.02.2018.  The team would submit its recommendations for provision of appropriate facilities. It was also suggested that DDCA could consider making Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium as a Model Accessible Stadium for persons with disabilities in Delhi.  Inputs from the ‘Guide Book on Creating Sporting & Recreational Activities for Persons with Disabilities’ published by the Office of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities in 2007 would also be taken. It was however, made clear that this suggestion should not delay the process of implementing the current proposals of the respondent to make the stadium accessible.

11.             The respondent vide affidavit of compliance dated 21.02.2018 inter-alia submitted as under:
“(i)             That in compliance of the above said order dated 11.01.2017 immediate directions were given to Sh Ajay Kumar Chaurassia, Civil Engineer of DDCA by the Hon’ble Justice (Retd.) Vikramjit Sen, who is presently the Court appointed Administrator of the respondent DDCA, to conduct an audit of the Feroz Shah Kotla Ground.  Furthermore, Chief Engineer was instructed to give his proposals regarding the subject herein and submit a report immediately.  The same is produced in the following paras.
(ii)          That it is submitted in this regard that construction of the toilets for the Disabled persons and installations of railing for the ramp exits has been completed and is well maintained in the Hill A area, whereas in relation to Hill B area construction work of toilet for the handicapped, grab bar in toilet and installations of railing for the ramp is under process.

(iii)         That construction of seating area at the ground floor of East as well as of West stand for the Disabled persons has been proposed having fully furnished facilities which includes proper barricading along with ramp and overall capacity of 50 persons each stand.

(iv)         That appointment of the volunteers to assist the physically handicapped persons/spectators during the time of a match/event and to escort them to these stands is proposed.

(v)          That in addition to the above it is also proposed to allocate some points inside as well as outside the premises of the Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium from where handicapped persons can be picked up by a vehicle from the respective stands and dropped at the stadium gate”.

12.         The respondent organised an access audit of the stadium on 27.02.2018, by an Access Audit Team comprising of the complainant, a Civil Engineer & an Architect of DDCA and two functionaries of this Court.  The Access Audit Committee has submitted its report with its recommendations.

13.         It will be in the fitness of things for this Court to also incorporate in this order, the specific provisions in the Act to ensure effective participation in sporting activities of the persons with disabilities for which accessibility of stadia and all other sports facilities is pre-requisite.  The relevant sections are Section 30 and Section 47(1)(e) which are reproduced below:

Section 30:
“(1)The appropriate Government shall take measures to ensure effective participation in sporting activities of the persons with disabilities.
(2) The sports authorities shall accord due recognition to the right of persons with disabilities to participate in sports and shall make due provisions for the inclusion of persons with disabilities in their schemes and programmes for the promotion and development of sporting talents.
(3) Without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), the appropriate Government and the sports authorities shall take measures to,—
(a) restructure courses and programmes to ensure access, inclusion and participation of persons with disabilities in all sporting activities;
(b) redesign and support infrastructure facilities of all sporting activities for persons with disabilities; (c) develop technology to enhance potential, talent, capacity and ability in sporting activities of all persons with disabilities;
(d) provide multi-sensory essentials and features in all sporting activities to ensure effective participation of all persons with disabilities;
(e) allocate funds for development of state of art sport facilities for training of persons with disabilities;
(f ) promote and organise disability specific sporting events for persons with disabilities and also facilitate awards to the winners and other participants of such sporting events”.

Section 47 (1) (e):
             “...................the appropriate Government shall endeavour to develop human resource for the purposes of this Act and to that end shall—
....................(e) conduct training programmes for sports teachers with focus on sports, games, adventure activities”

14.         With a positive approach of DDCA now, it is expected that the stadium will be made truly accessible to persons with disabilities to make their rights to participate in sports activities real and on equal basis with others.  It is reiterated that any support that is possible for this Court, will be extended to make the Feroz Shah Kotla Stadium a model accessible stadium for persons with disabilities in Delhi which can be replicated elsewhere in the country. 

15.         An ATR  be submitted to this Court within three months from the date of receipt of this Order as required under Section 81 of the Act.

16.         Considering that accessibility of stadia and sports facilities throughout the country is critical for effective participation in sporting activities of persons with disabilities on equal basis with others, a copy of this order is being sent to the concerned Ministries / Departments and other authorities in the Government of India among others for necessary action as deemed fit and if necessary to support and guide DDCA in making Feroz Shah Kotla Cricket Stadium a model accessible stadium.

17.         The matter is disposed off accordingly.

18.         Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 16th  day of March, 2018.     


           (T.D. Dhariyal )
                     State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities

Copy to :
1.    Secretary, Department of Sports, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Govt. of India, R.No. 3, C-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.
2.    Secretary, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, 5th Floor Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex,  Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.
3.    Secretary, Social Welfare Department, GNCT of Delhi, Delhi Gate, New Delhi.

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Vivek Kumar, S/o Sh. Raj Pal Vs. Commissioner SDMC & Anr | Case No. 4/1336/2016-Wel./CD/6119-6121 | Dated: 13.03.2018




              In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 4/1336/2016-Wel./CD/6119-6121                     Dated: 13.03.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Vivek Kumar, S/o Sh. Raj Pal
H.No. 414, Paprawat, 
Near C.R. Oasis Convenient School,
Najafgarh, New Delhi-110043                                        ................ Petitioner

                                          Versus   
The Commissioner,
South Delhi Municipal Corporation,
9th Floor, Dr. SPM Civic Centre,
J.L.N. Marg, New Delhi-110002                            ………...…Respondent No.1
         

The Commissioner,
East Delhi Municipal Corporation,
419, Udyog Sadan, Paparganj,
Industrial Area, Delhi-110096                                ………...…Respondent No.2


                             ORDER

The above named complainant with 80% locomotor disability filed a complaint dated 31.08.2016 regarding renewal of his contract as a primary education teacher in EDMC w.e.f. 01.07.2016.  He submitted that he was appointed against a reserved vacancy for persons with disabilities on merit.  He was transferred from EDMC to SDMC on his request due to his disability.  All the teachers appointed on contract basis with him in EDMC were re-appointed on 01 July, 2016.  However, his contract was not renewed though the vacancy is lying unfilled.

2.       The Complaint was taken up with respondent No. 1 (SDMC) on 31.08.2016 followed by reminders dated 07.10.16 and 15.11.16.  As no reply was received, a hearing was scheduled on 29.12.2016. 

3.       In the meantime vide letter dated 01.12.2016 SDMC informed that services of the complainant cannot be renewed as he was recruited during 2013 by EDMC.  SDMC had renewed contracts of those who had been recruited upto 31.10.2010.  The respondent also stated that if the complaint is considered, all the contract teachers would also have to be considered whereas the issue has already been decided by Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in the matter of Shanton V Tanwar Vs. SDMC.  Vide another reply dated 07.03.2017, SDMC submitted that the matter was also examined in connection with Law Department of SDMC who opined that contractual appointment of the complainant could not be extended.  The backlog vacancies have been referred to DSSSB for appointment to the post of primary teachers in the year 2009-10.  The selection process has not yet completed by the DSSSB.

4.       EDMC vide letter dated 14.12.2017 inter-alia submitted that as per circular No. D/894/ADC/Admin./HQ/13-14 dated 09.01.2014 no inter-corporation transfer of contractual teachers would be considered.  Despite this, keeping in view the difficulties being faced by the complainant in travelling from Nazafgarh to Shah(North), his case was considered and he was transferred to SDMC.  As the complainant is no longer an employee of the EDMC, EDMC has
ng the hearing the representative of EDMC submitted that the recomnothing to do with his re-engagement.  

5.       On 17.01.2018 durimendation is the ROP dated 27.12.2017 was submitted to the higher authority and there was no change in the decision that has already been communicated vide letter dated 14.12.2017. 

          The recommendation was made to EDMC because SDMC re-engaged contract teachers who were engaged up to 31.10.2010 whereas the complainant was engaged in the year 2013.  The complainant who was heard on telephone during the hearing, stated that he would make necessary arrangement for his stay near his place of posting if he is re-engaged and will not ask for transfer.

6. After a series of hearings on 20.09.2017,13.11.2017,14.12.2017and 17.01.2018, EDMC was advised vide record of proceedings dated 14.12.2017 and 18.01.2018 to consider the complainant for the post of primary teacher on contract basis against the vacant post until the post is  filled by a person with disability on regular basis since the complainant was appointed on contract by EDMC against the vacancy for persons with disabilities, which was still lying vacant and the contract appointees were still continuing in EDMC.

7.       He was advised to meet the Commissioner, EDMC and intimate its outcome to this court within 10 days.  On 18.01.2018, the complainant met the Commissioner, EDMC, who approved renewal of contract appointment of the complainant and he was posted at EDMC Primary School, Khajuri Khas-II on 25.01.2018.  EDMC vide letter dated  27.02.2018 informed that Sh. Vivek Kumar has been allowed to be engaged as a contract teacher in EDMC w.e.f. 25.01.2018 vide order No. D/2489/DDE/Admn./Edn./HQ/EDMC/18 dated 19.02.2018 which is a very positive step.

8.         In light of the positive action by Commissioner, EDMC, the complaint is disposed off.

9.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 9th day of March, 2018.  
   
                                                                            
                                                                                       (T.D. Dhariyal)
                     State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities