Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Suo Motu Vs. Vice Chancellor, Dr. BR Ambedkar University & Anr. | Case No.919/1032/2019/05/3699-3700 | Dated: 23.07.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No.919/1032/2019/05/3699-3700                             Dated: 23.07.2019      

In the matter of:

Suo Motu          
                                 
Vs

Vice Chancellor,
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University,
Lothian Road, Kashmere Gate,
Delhi-110006.                                                       …………Respondent No.1

The Secretary,
Directorate of Higher Education,
Govt. of NCT of Delhi,
5, Sham Nath Marg,
Prema Kunj, Civil Lines,
Delhi-110054.                                                    ……………Respondent No.2

Date of hearing:         19.07.2019  
Present:               Sh. Santosh Kumar Singh, Dean, Student Services, Sh. Harsh Kapoor, Asstt. Registrar and Ms. Bindu Nair, Asstt. Registrar, on behalf of Respondent No.2.                                    

ORDER

It was brought to the notice of this court that the drop down box in the online application form 2019 of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Delhi provides only for “PwD Hearing Handicapped”, “PwD Orthopedically Handicapped” and “PwD Visually Handicapped”.  Therefore, persons having benchmark disability of all the category of disabilities would not be able to apply. 

2.   The Schedule to the Act contains the following specified disabilities:-
Locomotor disability, leprosy cured person, cerebral palsy, dwarfism, muscular dystrophy, acid attach victims, blindness, low vision, deaf and hard of hearing, speech and language disability, intellectual disability, specified learning disability, autism spectrum disorder, mental illness, chronic neurological conditions, multiple sclerosis, parkinson’s disease, hemophilia, thalassemia, sickle cell disease and multiple disabilities.

3.   As per Section 2(r) of the Act, person with benchmark disability” means a person with not less than forty per cent of a specified disability where specified disability has not been defined in measurable terms and includes a person with disability where specified disability has been defined in measurable terms, as certified by the certifying authority.

4.   Section 32 of the Act provides:
“(1) All Government institutions of higher education and other higher education institutions receiving aid from the Government shall reserve not less than five per cent. seatsfor persons with benchmark disabilities.
(2)The persons with benchmark disabilities shall be given an upper age relaxation of five years for admission in institutions of higher education.”
  
5.   The matter was taken up with the respondent university vide Show Cause Notice dated 31.05.2019 with advice to modify the online application format by 07.06.2019 to enable persons with all the specified disabilities mentioned in the Schedule to the Act to apply using appropriate expressions/terms and also provide for a mechanism for instant removal of any difficulty faced by applicants with benchmark disability in applying for admission to various courses offered by the University.  Respondent No. 2 was directed to issue appropriate guidelines/advisory to all the Government Institutions of higher education and other higher education institutions receiving aid from the Government to ensure reservation of not less than 5% seats for persons with benchmark disabilities and upper age relaxation of 5 years.

6.   Respondent No.1 vide reply dated 12.06.2019 inter alia submitted as under:-
          “The response is as under:-
1.            The reservation of 5% seats for persons with benchmark disabilities is being followed by AUD.  All the persons with benchmark disabilities are given an upper age relaxation of five years for admission.
2.            As per chapter 4 for Disability under clause 34 the following are the parameters of disabilities:
i.             blindness and low vision
ii.            Deaf and hard of hearing
iii.           Locomotor disability including cerebral palsy, leprosy cured, dwarfism, acid attach victims and muscular dystrophy;
iv.          Autism, intellectual disability specific learning disability and mental illness
It may please be noticed that the in the online application form the above mentioned categories have been broady categorized as:
(i)           PwD Visually Handicapped (VH)
(ii)          PwD Hearing Handicapped (HH)
(iii)        PwD Orthopedically Handicapped (OH)
(iv)        PwD Intellectual Disabilities (ID)

It may be noted that the *University has been complying with the PwD Act.  However, keeping in view the aforesaid notice received from the commission informing about appropriate expression./terms, the university will modify the online application for to the extent that full form/coverage of various PwD categories will be visible in the form itself.
In case you need any further clarifications, please feel free to revert. 
Yours sincerely,
Dean, Student Services”

7.   Upon considering the reply of Respondent No.1 and no response from Respondent No.2, a hearing was scheduled on 19.07.2019.

8.   While none appeared from Dte. of Higher Education, the representatives of Respondent No. 1 submitted that they have taken action as per their understanding and the University would like to make its campus fully accessible and friendly to persons with disabilities and follow the provisions of the Act in the letter and spirit.

9.   Besides the expression/terms used by the University, not being the appropriate ones, there is a likelihood of the persons having benchmark disabilities not mentioned in the drop down box, may not apply or may not be able to apply for admission against the reserved seats.

10. The usage of the expression “handicapped” has long been recommended to be banned and the Social Welfare Department, GNCT of Delhi has also issued a circular in this regard.

11. It is also pertinent to bring to the notice of the respondents that the Universities and colleges like any other Government establishment are mandated to reserve seats under Section 32 and vacancies for persons with benchmark disabilities under section 34 of the Act.  They need to ensure accessibility to built environment, information technology (website) under section 42, 44, 45 and 46, registration of Equal Opportunity Policy under section 21 and appoint Grievance Redressal Officer under section 23 of the Act and the Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2018.  The Universities and colleges are also specifically mandated to :-
(i)      implement provisions under section 39 for orientation and sensitization on human condition of disability;
(ii)      induct disability as a component for all education courses for colleges and University teachers, organize training programmes for  sports teachers and promote teaching and research in disability studies and establish study centres for such studies under section 47 of the Act and induct rights of persons with disabilities in curriculum in Universities and colleges.



12.     In light of the above, the following recommendations are made:-
(i)      The drop down box for online admission or any form that is used for admissions, should either mention all the specified disabilities as these appear in the Schedule to the Act or it should mention that reservation of seats for persons with benchmark disability under section 32 of the Act is open to persons having benchmark disability of all the categories mentioned in the Schedule to the Act.
(ii)      The expressions/the terms as mentioned in the Act only should be used for various communications, advertisements, website etc. and the expression “handicapped” should not be used.
(iii)     Respondent No. 2 should issue appropriate guidelines/ advisories to all the Government institutions of higher education and other higher education institutions receiving aid from the Government to ensure reservation of not less than 5% seats for persons with benchmark disabilities and upper age relaxation of 5 years.  They should also be advised to facilitate admission of candidates with disabilities.  In addition, appropriate directions may also be issued to all Universities/Colleges/Institutions of higher education to ensure implementation of various provisions in the Act concerning them which are mandatory.
    
13.     This court be informed of the action taken on the recommendations within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under section 81 of the Act.


14.     The matter is disposed of with the above recommendations.

15.     Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 23rd day of July, 2019.




(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Aarti Vs. Director, Deptt of Social Welfare & Anr. | Case No.1001/1092/2019/06/3665-3667 | Dated:22.07.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No.1001/1092/2019/06/3665-3667                           Dated:22.07.2019 

In the matter of:

Ms. Aarti,
H.No. 430 Mewa Ganj Chhota Bazar,
Shahdara, Delhi-110032.                                  …………..Complainant

Versus

The Director,
Department of Social Welfare,
GLNS Complex,
New Delhi-110002.                                           ..........Respondent No. 1

The DSWO (East),
Department of Social Welfare,
Block 10, Geeta Colony,
Delhi-110031.                                                             ..........Respondent No. 2

ORDER

The above named complainant Ms. Aarti, mother of Master Ritik, a person with 50% Intellectual disability vide her complaint received on 25.06.2019 submitted that she submitted an application for disability pension in respect of her son on 28.02.2017 in the office of DSWO (East).  She further submitted that even after visiting DSWO (East) Office many times, the application for disability pension was still pending.   She requested for help in releasing disability pension for her son.



2.     The complaint was taken up with the respondents vide Show Cause-cum-Hearing Notice dated 01.07.2019 under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Act 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act.  The respondents were directed to to show cause why the pension should not be released to the complainant and to submit para-wise/point-wise comments on the complaint by 15.07.2019 and if the same was not done by that date, a hearing was proposed on 13.08.2019.

3.       DSWO(East) vide his letter dated 15.07.2019 submitted as under:-

“In the above said matter, the following point wise comments are as under:-

1.    The complainant Smt. Aarti had applied Handicapped pension of her son Sh. Ritik in this office on dated 28.02.2017.
2.    The case has already been sanctioned by this office and sent to FAS Branch, Delhi Gate for remittance of payment.  As per data available in this office, the pension amount is not being disbursed into the applicant’s account due to fifteen digit (short) account number as submitted by the applicant.  Sixteen digit account number of applicant is required to be submitted for disbursement of pension through ECS/Adhaar based.
3.    On 12.07.2019 applicant has re-submitted his bank details and same has been updated and send it to FAS Branch for disbursement (Will be sent on 25th ).
4.       From the reply of the respondent No.2, it is not clear why did it take two and a half years to inform deficiency in the application.  This calls for overhauling the process of sanction and release of the amount of pension to persons with disabilities which should also provide  for accountability at each stage and fixing responsibility.  Such an exercise be undertaken in right earnest.
5.       Respondent No. 1 is directed to ensure that the amount of disability pension including the arrears is credited to complainant’s account by 15.09.2019.  If the amount is not credited to complainant’s account by that date, the complainant may intimate this court through e-mail/ telephone.
6.       Action taken in the matter be intimated to this court as required under Section 81 of the Act.
7.       The complaint is disposed of with the above direction.
8.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 22nd day of July, 2019.



           (T.D. Dhariyal)
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities






Suo Motu Vs. Principal Secretary, Department of Law, Justice & Legislative Affairs | Case No. 988/1141/2019/06/ 3652-3657 | Dated: 22.07. 2019


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25-D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone 011-23216002-04, Telefax:011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
(Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016)

       Case No. 988/1141/2019/06/ 3652-3657                 Dated: 22.07. 2019
 
In the matter of:

SUO-MOTU
Versus

The Principal Secretary,
Department of Law, Justice & Legislative Affairs
Government of NCTof Delhi,
8th Level, C-Wing, Delhi Secretariat,
Players Building, I.P. Estate,
New Delhi – 110002.                               ....................         Respondent
         

Date of hearing: 18.07.2019

Present:     Sh. Lovleen, Additional Secretary (Law) and Sh. M.B. Malhotra, Dy.Secretary (Law) on behalf of Respondent.


ORDER

Section 84 and 85 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 hereinafter referred to as an Act, provide as under:

“84. For the purpose of providing speedy trial, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification, specify for each district, a Court of Sessions to be a Special Court to try the offences under this Act.

85. (1) For every Special Court, the State Government may, by notification, specify a Public Prosecutor or appoint an advocate, who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years, as a Special Public Prosecutor for the purpose of conducting cases in that Court.”

2.      Rule 51 of the Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2018, herein after referred to as Delhi RPwD Rules, prescribes the terms and conditions of appointment of public prosecutors to be appointed in the Special Courts and is reproduced below:
“51. Appointment of Public Prosecutor-
 (1) The Public Prosecutor to be appointed in every Special Court shall have-
(a) practical experience of handling cases preferably of persons with disabilities;
(b) experience at the Bar of not less than seven years; and
(c) shall be well versed with local language and customs.

(2) The fee and other remunerations of the Special Public Prosecutor specified or appointed under sub- section (1) of section 85 of the Act shall be the same as that of Public Prosecutor appointed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (1 of 1974) for conducting the cases before a court of session.”
          
3.      Secretary (Social Welfare), GNCT of Delhi was requested to take action for specifying the Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors vide letter dated 25.01.2018.  Social Welfare Department vide letter dated 27.02.2018 informed that the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs had approached the Hon’ble High Court for the purpose.

4.      Thereafter the matter was taken up with the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide letter dated    08.03.2018 followed by reminders dated  27.04.2018, 16.05.2018, 26.06.2018 and D.O. letter dated 31.12.2018 and letter dated 20.02.2019.  Registrar General, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi was also requested to intimate the status. 

5.      Vide letter dated 28.05.2018 and 10.07.2019, Registrar General, High Court of Delhi informed that no request to designate Special Courts under the Act had been received from Govt. of NCT of Delhi.  However, a request from the District and Sessions Judge (North), Rohini, Delhi  had been received and was pending consideration of the Hon’ble Court.

6.      As there was no response even after lapse of sufficient time, vide Show-Cause-Cum-Hearing Notice dated 17.06.2019,  Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs  was directed  under Section 80.(b) of the Act to show cause why the Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors should not be specified  in each district by 11.07.2019 and if the same was not done  by the said date, it was decided to hold a hearing on 18.07.2019 under Section 82 of the Act and Rule 49 of Delhi RPwD Rules.

7.      Joint Registrar (Gazette-I) High Court of Delhi vide letter dated 10.07.2019 informed as under :

“Sub: Notice to show cause-cum-hearing notice – Case No.F.988/1141/2019/06/2764 dated 17.06.2019.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the copy of Notice to show cause-cum-hearing dated 17.06.2019 issued by your Court in the case mentioned above and to inform that this Court vide letter dated 08.10.2018 (Annexure-‘A’) had already made recommendation to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to issue necessary notification with regard to designation of Court of Additional Sessions Judge-02 in each District as Special Court to try the offences under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.  Thereafter, the Addl. Secretary, GNCTD, Department of Law, Justice & LA vide this Court’s letter dated 17.12.2018 (Annexure-‘B’) was again informed about the said recommendations.  However, no response has been received from them till now.
Yours faithfully,

(Krishan Kr. Sharma)
Joint Registrar (Gazette-I) for Registrar General”


8.      On 18.07.2019, Sh. Loveleen, Additional Secretary (Law, Justice,& LA) and Sh. M.B. Malhotra, Dy. Secretary (Law) appeared and submitted reply dated 18.07.2019, which is reproduced below:

Sub:         Notice to show cause-cum-hearing notice – Case   No.F.988/1141/2019/06/2764 dated 17.06.2019.
Sir,
In pursuance to your show cause-cum-hearing notice for non designating the Special Court and Special Public Prosecutor in each district in accordance with the provision of Sections 84 and 85 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and Rule 51 of the Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2018, it is submitted that Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide letter dated 8.10.2018 had already made recommendations to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to issue necessary notification for designating the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge-02 in each District as Special Court to try the offences under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
The matter was processed for issue of notification immediately after receipt of recommendation from Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and the file is under process since then.  The file was last sent to the Hon’ble Minister (Law), Govt. of NCT of Delhi on 03.07.2019 with the request to place the proposal before the Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi for taking further action for issue of notification.  The file is under consideration with Hon’ble Minister (Law) Office since 03.07.2019 (copy of file monitoring is enclosed).
After receipt of your aforesaid notice, a letter dated 11.7.2019 has also been sent to the office of Hon’ble Minister (Law) to expedite the proposal in view of notice issued by the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (copy enclosed).  However, the same is awaited.
This issues with the prior approval of the Principal Secretary (Law, Justice & LA), Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Yours sincerely,

(Loveleen)
Addl. Secretary (Law, Justice & LA)”

           
9.      In view of the above, Addl. Secretary (Law, Justice& LA) requested that at least one month may be allowed and the developments in the matter would be regularly intimated to this court.

10.    During the course of hearing,  Sh. G.P. Singh, Secretary to Hon’ble Minister, Law, who was contacted on telephone, informed that the file would be sent back soon with Hon’ble Minister’s comments.

11.    After detailed interaction during the hearing, it appeared that there was lack of consensus on whether the notification can be issued with the approval of the Hon’ble Minister of Law or it has to be approved by and issued in the name of the Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi.

12.    All concerned need to appreciate that Section 84 and 85 of the Act are mandatory.  The Act, which has been enacted to give effect to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities after ratifying the said Convention, must be implemented in right earnest and with promptitude.  Failing this, the very purpose of enacting one of the most comprehensive and forward looking legislations for empowerment of persons with disabilities and their inclusion in the society will surely be lost.  If implementation of a simple yet mandatory provision of the Act is allowed to be entangled in the procedural disputes, the high expectations and hopes that this Act has generated amongst persons with disabilities in the NCT of Delhi will be shattered. It also would give an impression that the right holders and the authorities are not serious enough in implementing the socially beneficial legislation and are indifferent to protecting their rights who still remain one of the most marginalised sections of the society.

13.    Although no time frame for specifying Special Courts has been prescribed, yet inordinate delay in implementing the mandatory provision of Act actually amounts to contravention of the said sections of the Act and the Rules made thereunder  and may attract penal action under section 89 of the Act.

14.    It is learnt that notifications for appointment of Presiding Officers of Family Courts and appointment of Notaries have recently been issued after the intervention of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. 

15.    In view of the fact that more than two years have elapsed since the Act came into effect on 19.04.2017 and the stalemate between the concerned apex authorities, no purpose will be served by granting a month’s time as requested during the hearing and keeping this case pending as neither the provisions of the Act/ Rules nor the prescribed procedures and the orders of Hon’ble Courts on the subject are likely to be changed in a month or two. I therefore consider it appropriate to dispose of the matter  with the following recommendations in the larger interest of persons with disabilities:

(i)      Principal Secretary, Law, Justice and LA, Govt. of NCT of Delhi should implement the recommendation of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi that Additional Sessions Judge-02 of each court be specified as Special Court to try the offences under the Act and specify Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the cases in the Special Courts within 10 days of receipt of this order being the requirement of the law.
(ii)      The copy of the notification(s) be submitted to Registrar General, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and the State commissioner for Persons with Disabilities by 06.08.2019.
(iii)     If the Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors are not specified and the notification (s) is / are not received by 06.08.2019, Registrar General, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi is requested to place a copy of this order before Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi for information and necessary action so as to ensure that the concerned authorities specify Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors as mandated under Section 84 and 85 of the Act and Rule 51 of the Delhi RPwD Rules without further loss of time.
         
16.    Principal Secretary, Law, Justice and LA and Registrar General, High Court of Delhi are advised to inform the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities of the action taken on the recommendations within three months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.

17.    The case is accordingly disposed of.
         
18.    Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 22th  day of July, 2019.     

( T.D. Dhariyal )
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
Copy to:
 1.   Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, IP Estate, New Delhi – 110002, Email: csdelhi@nic.in   : For information.
2.   Principal Secretary to Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi, Rajniwas, Delhi, Email: seclg@nic.in  : For information of the Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi.
3.   Secretary to Hon’ble Minister of Law, Justice and LA, Room No. 808, A-Wing, Delhi Secretariat, New Delhi-110002, Email: minlawtpt.delhi@nic.in : For information of Hon’ble Minister of Law.
4.   The Registrar General, High Court of Delhi, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi110503, Email: rg.dhc@nic.in : For information and necessary action on Para 15. (iii) of this order.
5.   Secretary (Social Welfare Deptt.), GLNS Complex, Delhi Gate, New Delhi, Email: pssw@nic.in : For information.
 

( T.D. Dhariyal )
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities