Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Aarti Vs. Director, Deptt of Social Welfare & Anr. | Case No.1001/1092/2019/06/3665-3667 | Dated:22.07.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No.1001/1092/2019/06/3665-3667                           Dated:22.07.2019 

In the matter of:

Ms. Aarti,
H.No. 430 Mewa Ganj Chhota Bazar,
Shahdara, Delhi-110032.                                  …………..Complainant

Versus

The Director,
Department of Social Welfare,
GLNS Complex,
New Delhi-110002.                                           ..........Respondent No. 1

The DSWO (East),
Department of Social Welfare,
Block 10, Geeta Colony,
Delhi-110031.                                                             ..........Respondent No. 2

ORDER

The above named complainant Ms. Aarti, mother of Master Ritik, a person with 50% Intellectual disability vide her complaint received on 25.06.2019 submitted that she submitted an application for disability pension in respect of her son on 28.02.2017 in the office of DSWO (East).  She further submitted that even after visiting DSWO (East) Office many times, the application for disability pension was still pending.   She requested for help in releasing disability pension for her son.



2.     The complaint was taken up with the respondents vide Show Cause-cum-Hearing Notice dated 01.07.2019 under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Act 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act.  The respondents were directed to to show cause why the pension should not be released to the complainant and to submit para-wise/point-wise comments on the complaint by 15.07.2019 and if the same was not done by that date, a hearing was proposed on 13.08.2019.

3.       DSWO(East) vide his letter dated 15.07.2019 submitted as under:-

“In the above said matter, the following point wise comments are as under:-

1.    The complainant Smt. Aarti had applied Handicapped pension of her son Sh. Ritik in this office on dated 28.02.2017.
2.    The case has already been sanctioned by this office and sent to FAS Branch, Delhi Gate for remittance of payment.  As per data available in this office, the pension amount is not being disbursed into the applicant’s account due to fifteen digit (short) account number as submitted by the applicant.  Sixteen digit account number of applicant is required to be submitted for disbursement of pension through ECS/Adhaar based.
3.    On 12.07.2019 applicant has re-submitted his bank details and same has been updated and send it to FAS Branch for disbursement (Will be sent on 25th ).
4.       From the reply of the respondent No.2, it is not clear why did it take two and a half years to inform deficiency in the application.  This calls for overhauling the process of sanction and release of the amount of pension to persons with disabilities which should also provide  for accountability at each stage and fixing responsibility.  Such an exercise be undertaken in right earnest.
5.       Respondent No. 1 is directed to ensure that the amount of disability pension including the arrears is credited to complainant’s account by 15.09.2019.  If the amount is not credited to complainant’s account by that date, the complainant may intimate this court through e-mail/ telephone.
6.       Action taken in the matter be intimated to this court as required under Section 81 of the Act.
7.       The complaint is disposed of with the above direction.
8.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 22nd day of July, 2019.



           (T.D. Dhariyal)
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities






Suo Motu Vs. Principal Secretary, Department of Law, Justice & Legislative Affairs | Case No. 988/1141/2019/06/ 3652-3657 | Dated: 22.07. 2019


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25-D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone 011-23216002-04, Telefax:011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
(Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016)

       Case No. 988/1141/2019/06/ 3652-3657                 Dated: 22.07. 2019
 
In the matter of:

SUO-MOTU
Versus

The Principal Secretary,
Department of Law, Justice & Legislative Affairs
Government of NCTof Delhi,
8th Level, C-Wing, Delhi Secretariat,
Players Building, I.P. Estate,
New Delhi – 110002.                               ....................         Respondent
         

Date of hearing: 18.07.2019

Present:     Sh. Lovleen, Additional Secretary (Law) and Sh. M.B. Malhotra, Dy.Secretary (Law) on behalf of Respondent.


ORDER

Section 84 and 85 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 hereinafter referred to as an Act, provide as under:

“84. For the purpose of providing speedy trial, the State Government shall, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification, specify for each district, a Court of Sessions to be a Special Court to try the offences under this Act.

85. (1) For every Special Court, the State Government may, by notification, specify a Public Prosecutor or appoint an advocate, who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years, as a Special Public Prosecutor for the purpose of conducting cases in that Court.”

2.      Rule 51 of the Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2018, herein after referred to as Delhi RPwD Rules, prescribes the terms and conditions of appointment of public prosecutors to be appointed in the Special Courts and is reproduced below:
“51. Appointment of Public Prosecutor-
 (1) The Public Prosecutor to be appointed in every Special Court shall have-
(a) practical experience of handling cases preferably of persons with disabilities;
(b) experience at the Bar of not less than seven years; and
(c) shall be well versed with local language and customs.

(2) The fee and other remunerations of the Special Public Prosecutor specified or appointed under sub- section (1) of section 85 of the Act shall be the same as that of Public Prosecutor appointed by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (1 of 1974) for conducting the cases before a court of session.”
          
3.      Secretary (Social Welfare), GNCT of Delhi was requested to take action for specifying the Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors vide letter dated 25.01.2018.  Social Welfare Department vide letter dated 27.02.2018 informed that the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs had approached the Hon’ble High Court for the purpose.

4.      Thereafter the matter was taken up with the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide letter dated    08.03.2018 followed by reminders dated  27.04.2018, 16.05.2018, 26.06.2018 and D.O. letter dated 31.12.2018 and letter dated 20.02.2019.  Registrar General, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi was also requested to intimate the status. 

5.      Vide letter dated 28.05.2018 and 10.07.2019, Registrar General, High Court of Delhi informed that no request to designate Special Courts under the Act had been received from Govt. of NCT of Delhi.  However, a request from the District and Sessions Judge (North), Rohini, Delhi  had been received and was pending consideration of the Hon’ble Court.

6.      As there was no response even after lapse of sufficient time, vide Show-Cause-Cum-Hearing Notice dated 17.06.2019,  Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs  was directed  under Section 80.(b) of the Act to show cause why the Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors should not be specified  in each district by 11.07.2019 and if the same was not done  by the said date, it was decided to hold a hearing on 18.07.2019 under Section 82 of the Act and Rule 49 of Delhi RPwD Rules.

7.      Joint Registrar (Gazette-I) High Court of Delhi vide letter dated 10.07.2019 informed as under :

“Sub: Notice to show cause-cum-hearing notice – Case No.F.988/1141/2019/06/2764 dated 17.06.2019.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the copy of Notice to show cause-cum-hearing dated 17.06.2019 issued by your Court in the case mentioned above and to inform that this Court vide letter dated 08.10.2018 (Annexure-‘A’) had already made recommendation to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to issue necessary notification with regard to designation of Court of Additional Sessions Judge-02 in each District as Special Court to try the offences under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.  Thereafter, the Addl. Secretary, GNCTD, Department of Law, Justice & LA vide this Court’s letter dated 17.12.2018 (Annexure-‘B’) was again informed about the said recommendations.  However, no response has been received from them till now.
Yours faithfully,

(Krishan Kr. Sharma)
Joint Registrar (Gazette-I) for Registrar General”


8.      On 18.07.2019, Sh. Loveleen, Additional Secretary (Law, Justice,& LA) and Sh. M.B. Malhotra, Dy. Secretary (Law) appeared and submitted reply dated 18.07.2019, which is reproduced below:

Sub:         Notice to show cause-cum-hearing notice – Case   No.F.988/1141/2019/06/2764 dated 17.06.2019.
Sir,
In pursuance to your show cause-cum-hearing notice for non designating the Special Court and Special Public Prosecutor in each district in accordance with the provision of Sections 84 and 85 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 and Rule 51 of the Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2018, it is submitted that Hon’ble High Court of Delhi vide letter dated 8.10.2018 had already made recommendations to the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to issue necessary notification for designating the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge-02 in each District as Special Court to try the offences under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
The matter was processed for issue of notification immediately after receipt of recommendation from Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and the file is under process since then.  The file was last sent to the Hon’ble Minister (Law), Govt. of NCT of Delhi on 03.07.2019 with the request to place the proposal before the Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi for taking further action for issue of notification.  The file is under consideration with Hon’ble Minister (Law) Office since 03.07.2019 (copy of file monitoring is enclosed).
After receipt of your aforesaid notice, a letter dated 11.7.2019 has also been sent to the office of Hon’ble Minister (Law) to expedite the proposal in view of notice issued by the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (copy enclosed).  However, the same is awaited.
This issues with the prior approval of the Principal Secretary (Law, Justice & LA), Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Yours sincerely,

(Loveleen)
Addl. Secretary (Law, Justice & LA)”

           
9.      In view of the above, Addl. Secretary (Law, Justice& LA) requested that at least one month may be allowed and the developments in the matter would be regularly intimated to this court.

10.    During the course of hearing,  Sh. G.P. Singh, Secretary to Hon’ble Minister, Law, who was contacted on telephone, informed that the file would be sent back soon with Hon’ble Minister’s comments.

11.    After detailed interaction during the hearing, it appeared that there was lack of consensus on whether the notification can be issued with the approval of the Hon’ble Minister of Law or it has to be approved by and issued in the name of the Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi.

12.    All concerned need to appreciate that Section 84 and 85 of the Act are mandatory.  The Act, which has been enacted to give effect to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities after ratifying the said Convention, must be implemented in right earnest and with promptitude.  Failing this, the very purpose of enacting one of the most comprehensive and forward looking legislations for empowerment of persons with disabilities and their inclusion in the society will surely be lost.  If implementation of a simple yet mandatory provision of the Act is allowed to be entangled in the procedural disputes, the high expectations and hopes that this Act has generated amongst persons with disabilities in the NCT of Delhi will be shattered. It also would give an impression that the right holders and the authorities are not serious enough in implementing the socially beneficial legislation and are indifferent to protecting their rights who still remain one of the most marginalised sections of the society.

13.    Although no time frame for specifying Special Courts has been prescribed, yet inordinate delay in implementing the mandatory provision of Act actually amounts to contravention of the said sections of the Act and the Rules made thereunder  and may attract penal action under section 89 of the Act.

14.    It is learnt that notifications for appointment of Presiding Officers of Family Courts and appointment of Notaries have recently been issued after the intervention of Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. 

15.    In view of the fact that more than two years have elapsed since the Act came into effect on 19.04.2017 and the stalemate between the concerned apex authorities, no purpose will be served by granting a month’s time as requested during the hearing and keeping this case pending as neither the provisions of the Act/ Rules nor the prescribed procedures and the orders of Hon’ble Courts on the subject are likely to be changed in a month or two. I therefore consider it appropriate to dispose of the matter  with the following recommendations in the larger interest of persons with disabilities:

(i)      Principal Secretary, Law, Justice and LA, Govt. of NCT of Delhi should implement the recommendation of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi that Additional Sessions Judge-02 of each court be specified as Special Court to try the offences under the Act and specify Special Public Prosecutors for conducting the cases in the Special Courts within 10 days of receipt of this order being the requirement of the law.
(ii)      The copy of the notification(s) be submitted to Registrar General, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and the State commissioner for Persons with Disabilities by 06.08.2019.
(iii)     If the Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors are not specified and the notification (s) is / are not received by 06.08.2019, Registrar General, Hon’ble High Court of Delhi is requested to place a copy of this order before Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi for information and necessary action so as to ensure that the concerned authorities specify Special Courts and Special Public Prosecutors as mandated under Section 84 and 85 of the Act and Rule 51 of the Delhi RPwD Rules without further loss of time.
         
16.    Principal Secretary, Law, Justice and LA and Registrar General, High Court of Delhi are advised to inform the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities of the action taken on the recommendations within three months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.

17.    The case is accordingly disposed of.
         
18.    Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 22th  day of July, 2019.     

( T.D. Dhariyal )
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
Copy to:
 1.   Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Secretariat, IP Estate, New Delhi – 110002, Email: csdelhi@nic.in   : For information.
2.   Principal Secretary to Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi, Rajniwas, Delhi, Email: seclg@nic.in  : For information of the Hon’ble Lt. Governor of Delhi.
3.   Secretary to Hon’ble Minister of Law, Justice and LA, Room No. 808, A-Wing, Delhi Secretariat, New Delhi-110002, Email: minlawtpt.delhi@nic.in : For information of Hon’ble Minister of Law.
4.   The Registrar General, High Court of Delhi, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi110503, Email: rg.dhc@nic.in : For information and necessary action on Para 15. (iii) of this order.
5.   Secretary (Social Welfare Deptt.), GLNS Complex, Delhi Gate, New Delhi, Email: pssw@nic.in : For information.
 

( T.D. Dhariyal )
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities





Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Karan Bhatia Vs. Secretary cum Commissioner, Deptt of Revenue & 2 Ors. | Case No.904/1111/2019/05/3537-3540 | Dated:16.07.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25-D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-110002
Phone: 011-23216003-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No.904/1111/2019/05/3537-3540                    Dated:16.07.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Karan Bhatia,
G-203, Sidh Apartment,
Plot No.107, I.P. Extension,
Patpargang, Delhi-110092.                           .………..Complainant

Versus

The Secretary –cum- Commissioner
O/o. the Divisional Commissioner,
Department of Revenue,
5, Sham Nath Marg,
Delhi-110054                                                         …………..Respondent 1

The District Magistrate (East)
L.M. Bund, Shastri Nagar,
Delhi-110031                                                         …………..Respondent 2

The Sub Divisional Magistrate (East),
Pusta Road, Geeta Colony,
Delhi-110031                                                         …………..Respondent 3


SPECIMEN
ORDER


Sh. Karan Bhatia on behalf of his father Sh. Kamal Kant Bhatia, a person with disability, has filed a complaint vide e-mail dated 14.05.20419 which was registered in L.G Listening Post Portal and received from the office of the Divisional Commissioner, Delhi (Respondent No.1) vide letter dated 20.05.2019 under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Act 2016, here in after referred to as the Act.  He had also sent e-mails to the Office of Hon’ble Prime Minister, India, Chief Minister, Deputy Chief Minister, Law Minister, Divisional Commissioner, GNCT of Delhi.  Vide his e-mail dated 14.05.2019 submitted that his father had a brain stroke in 2008, 2011 and 2018. After prolonged treatment, he is bed ridden and has lost his speech.  He further submitted that he alongiwth his father visited the SDM(East) Office to get the will of his father registered alongwith GPA.  Though GPA was registered but will was not registered and the Sub Registrar did not treat his father properly and with dignity as his father was/ is unable to speak properly. The Sub Registrar did not make enough efforts to ascertain the provisions of the law and to understand what his father was trying to say.  The complainant further alleged that the officials made his father feel miserable, hurt and embarrassed because he could not speak for himself.  The complainant requested that his father’s will be registered and he should be given an opportunity to speak what he wants.

2.       The matter was taken up with respondents vide Show Cause cum Hearing Notice dated 04.06.2019 and were directed to show cause why necessary documentation cannot be done by deputing officials at the residence.  It had also been decided to hold a hearing in the matter on 22.07.2019 under Section 82 of the Act. 

3.         Sub Registrar, VIII-A, East District, vide his letter dated 03.07.2019 responded to Show Cause cum Hearing Notice dated 04.06.2019 as under:-

“Sir,  
With reference to the notice to Show Cause-cum-hearing received from your good office which further forward from the Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Govt. of NCT of Delhi vide their letter No. F.1(9)/DC(HQ)/PGMS/2019/1273 dated 20/05/2019.  It is to stated that on 07/05/2019 two instruments in the name and style as GPA and will was presented in this office for registration, out of which the GPA was registered vide registration No. 381 dated 08/05/2019 as Executants had answered the basic of mandatory questions through his signed of consent, but during the course and presentation of will, the testator was not properly responding even through his sign of consent, but, during the course of presentation of will, the testator was not properly responding even through his sign of consent, hence, on being safer side, and for the shake of testator that whether he is free will or influence, the  undersigned did not allow the same for presentation/registration.  Further, on receipt of the instant Show Cause Notice, the undersigned after getting the formalities fulfilled for home presentation, reached to the house of the testator and presented the instrument on 27/06/2019 which further registered vide registration No. 377 on being satisfied with his sign of consent on the asked questions during presentation.
Now, the complaint of the complainant has been redressed and therefore it is requested to kindly withdraw the Show Cause Notice and the case may be file. 

Yours faithfully,

(Rakesh Kumar Meena)
Sub Registrar, VIII-A”

4.       The complainant was contacted on telephone on 15.07.2019 to check whether the concerned officers have registered his father’s will and he was satisfied with the action taken by the concerned authorities.  The complainant confirmed that the concerned officers visited his house and completed all the necessary formalities and registered his father’s will and he  and his father are satisfied with the action taken by the concerned officers.

5.       The above action of the concerned officer under the guidance of Secretary(Revenue)-cum-Divisional Commissioner is indeed positive and should be appreciated.  However, I reiterate the need for intensive as-well-as extensive sensitisation and capacity building programmes for the officers and staff of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, the Corporations and all other agencies/ organisations operating from NCT of Delhi on the issues relating to rights of persons with disabilities at regular intervals.

6.       The complaint is disposed of.

7.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 16th day of July, 2019.



(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities


Thursday, July 11, 2019

Ajaibir Singh Vs. The Principal, Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy | Case No. 994/1031/2019/06/3268-3269 | Dated:10.07.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi.
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 994/1031/2019/06/3268-3269                           Dated:10.07.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Ajaibir Singh,
C-4-D/54-B, Janakpuri,
New Delhi-110058.
(E-mail-ajaibir.singh@in.ibm.com).                            ............. Complainant
                                          
Versus
The Principal,  
Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy,
(University of Delhi),
Karkardooma, Vikas Marg,
Delhi-110092.                                                              ……...…Respondent


Date of Hearing         08.07.2019

ORDER

The above named complainant, father of Master Mankaran Singh, a person with specific learning disability filed a complaint vide e-mail dated 18.06.2019 and submitted that Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy, affiliated to Delhi University has invited applications for Bachelor of Physiotherapy and earmarked one seat for persons with locomotor disability and not for persons with specific learning disability. In Delhi University and all other institutes, persons with all the 21 disabilities are allowed to appear for the examination under PH category.  Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya National Institute for Persons with Physical Disabilities has already allowed Master Mankaran to appear in the examination under PH category on 16th June 2019. Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy is asking him to apply as a General Category candidate.  As per the email dated 18.06.2019 of Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy, the institute has OH (Orthopedically Handicapped) seat and hence the application of the applicant would be considered under the general category. 

2.       As per Section 32 of the Act, “all Government institutions of higher education and other higher educational institutions receiving aid from the Government shall reserve not less than five per cent seats for persons with benchmark disabilities”.

3.       The matter was taken up with the respondent vide Show Cause-cum- Hearing Notice dated 21.06.2019 under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Act 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act directing the respondent why Master Mankaran Singh should not be allowed to apply for admission to Bachelor of Physiotherapy course under PH category against the reserved seat and submit an action taken report by 02.07.2019.  If the same was not done, it was decided to hold a hearing on 08.07.2019.

4.       The respondent vide letter received on 26.06.2019 submitted as under:-

“This letter is in response to the show cause cum hearing notice, Case No – 994/1031/2019/06, dated 21/06/2019.  The Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy (University of Delhi) wishes to place on record that Mr. Mankaran Singh s/o Mr. Ajaibir Singh, resident of C-4D/54-B, Janakpuri, New Delhi 110058 applied for admission to the Bachelor of Physiotherapy course for the year 2019-20 (reference no. is BPT/050/19).  Our point-wise response is as follows:
1.    The Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy (University of Delhi) under the aegis of Amar Jyoti Charitable Trust is a self-financed college that does not receive any funding from the University/UGC/ Government.
2.    The management of the Amar Jyoti Charitable Trust (AJCT) resolved to introduce one (1) seat specifically under the OH category at the Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy (AJIPT) in alignment with the core objectives of the Trust.  The eligibility criteria for the reserved OH seat was setup by the management after due diligence, deliberation, consultation and consensus by the management.
3.    AJIPT has one (1) reserved seat specifically for an Orthopedically Handicapped (OH) individual since the academic year 2004-2005.  For the purposes of the OH reserved category, OH is defined as point #4 & 5 of the PWD Act (1995/ amend.1996) and RPWD Act, 2016. Candidates that qualify under this category fulfil criteria as described in our prospectus.  Please refer to a copy of the relevant sections of our prospectus (copy attached).
4.    The PWD Act 1995 (amend 1996) – based on the act, guidelines for evaluation of various disabilities and procedure for a certificate, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (notification and annexures June 2001) referred to orthopaedic disability as locomotor disability and defines it as disability of the bones, joints or muscles leading to substantial restriction of the movement of the limb or any form of cerebral palsy.
5.    More recently, the Rights of Person with Disabilities Act (RPWD Act – section 1 A) 2016, defines locomotor disability as a person’s inability to execute distinctive activities associated with movement of self and objects resulting from affliction of musculoskeletal or nervous system or both.  Further, it includes leprosy cured person, cerebral palsy, dwarfism, muscular dystrophy, acid attack victims. 
6.    As per our records, Mr. Mankaran Singh (s/o Mr. Ajaibir Singh) has not provided any supporting document of his candidacy for the Orthopedically Handicapped (OH) seat.  Thus, the Institute cannot consider the application under reserved category of OH.
7.    The same was informed to the applicant, Mr. Mankaran Singh vide email dated June, 18 2019.  A copy of email is attached for your ready reference.
8.    Moreover, we wish to clarify that the institute did not force the candidate for applying under general category (as described in the opening paragraph of the show cause notice – last sentence).  The office email to him (attached for ready reference) clearly stated that the application could be considered under general category, if the candidate so desired.
9.    With reference to point #4 of the show cause notice that references section 32 of the Act (RPWD 2016) – we wish to state that we are entirely a private, self-finance Institute and do not received any government/UGC/University funding.
However, the issue of reservation for the differently abled is of importance and will be taken up for discussion in the next governing body meeting of AJIPT.
AJIPT will be happy to provide any additional information that is required by your office.  Our contact information is as follows: 011 – 2375512, 22379827, email- info@ajipt.org.
Sincerely
Dr. Raju K. Parasher
Director/ Principal
Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy
University of Delhi”

5.       A copy of the reply submitted by the respondent was sent to the complainant vide e-mail dated 04.07.2019 for comments/rejoinder.  As he did not appear for hearing on 08.07.2019, he was contacted on telephone and was informed that since only the Government and other Institutions of higher education receiving aid from the Government are obligated to reserve seats for persons with disabilities and Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy is neither a Government Institution nor receiving any aid from the Government for conducting the course in question, the provision of section 32 of the Act would not be applicable to that institute. 

6.       It is however clarified that section 32 of the Act does not envisage reservation of seats for any particular category of disability(ies) unlike section 34 which provides for reservation of vacancies for specified categories of disabilities for which the posts are identified.  Hence even though Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy is not obligated under the Act to reserve seats for persons with disabilities, yet it has proactively made a provision for it, it will be in the fitness of things to keep the reserved seats, if any, open to all the categories of persons with disabilities considering the intent of section 32 of the Act..

7.       In light of the above, the complaint is disposed off.

8.       Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 10th day of July, 2019. 


           (T.D. Dhariyal)
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities