Thursday, December 14, 2017

Shubhachu Kishor Vs. Sunny | Case No. 4/1115/2015-Wel./CD/3377-78 | Dated: 13 Dec 2017




In the Court of Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-23216002-04, Telefax: 23216005
[Vested with power of Civil Court under the Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunity, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995]

Case No. 4/1115/2015-Wel./CD/3377-78                                    Dated: 13.12.2017

In the matter of:

Sh. Shubhachu Kishor
15/18, Ist Floor, Old Rajender Nagar
New Delhi -60                                                                             …….... Petitioner     
                                                                     
Versus

Sh. Sunny
52/22, Old Rajender Nagar
Opposite to Vajiram & Ravi Instt.
New Delhi -60                                                                            …….... Respondent   

ORDER

                  The above named complainant, a person with 45% locomotor disability vide his complaint received on 22.09.2013 submitted that he was cheated of Rs.2000/- by a person named Sunny, broker.  He requested for recovery and return of Rs. 2000/.  The complaint was taken up vide communication dated 22.09.2015 followed by reminder dated 02.11.2015 directing Sh. Sunny to appear.  He appeared before the then Commissioner on 22.09.2015. Thereafter the matter was taken up with Dy. Commissioner of Police, Central District vide communication dated 16.11.2015.

2.  Additional DCP, Central District vide letter dated 16.11.2015 informed that as per the report of SHO, Rajender Nagar, during the course of enquiry, the complainant was asked to produce the documents in support of his complaint but he was unable to provide any document. Sh. Sunny was also interrogated and denied any transaction with the complainant.  He also refused to give any statement.  In absence of any documents related to the alleged transactions, no Police case was made.  However, the contact number of the beat staff was provided to the complainant and the concerned beat staff has also been directed to keep in touch with the complainant. 

3.  The Action Taken Report of the Police was sent to the complainant who vide his another complaint dated 3.2.2016 reiterated his allegations which was also referred to DCP, Central District vide letter dated 9.2.2016.  SHO, Rajender Nagar informed that fresh complaint was identical to the earlier one which was duly enquired and the report was submitted.  Therefore, no separate police enquiry was needed. 

4.  In the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly in light of the fact that there are no supporting documents in connection with the alleged transactions.  The law enforcing agency has also indicated its inability to proceed further in the absence of any evidence.  Therefore, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings in the matter.  The case is accordingly closed.

4.  Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 13th day of December, 2017.
        

(T.D. DHARIYAL)
Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities



                       




No comments:

Post a Comment