In the Court of Commissioner for Persons with
Disabilities
National
Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D,
Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-23216002-04,
Telefax: 23216005
[Vested
with power of Civil Court under the Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunity,
Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995]
Case No.
4/1115/2015-Wel./CD/3377-78 Dated: 13.12.2017
In the matter of:
Sh. Shubhachu Kishor
15/18, Ist Floor, Old Rajender Nagar
New Delhi -60 …….... Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Sunny
52/22, Old Rajender Nagar
Opposite to Vajiram & Ravi Instt.
New Delhi -60
ORDER
The above named complainant, a
person with 45% locomotor disability vide his complaint received on 22.09.2013
submitted that he was cheated of Rs.2000/- by a person named Sunny,
broker. He requested for recovery and
return of Rs. 2000/. The complaint was
taken up vide communication dated 22.09.2015 followed by reminder dated
02.11.2015 directing Sh. Sunny to appear.
He appeared before the then Commissioner on 22.09.2015. Thereafter the
matter was taken up with Dy. Commissioner of Police, Central District vide
communication dated 16.11.2015.
2. Additional DCP, Central District vide letter
dated 16.11.2015 informed that as per the report of SHO, Rajender Nagar, during
the course of enquiry, the complainant was asked to produce the documents in
support of his complaint but he was unable to provide any document. Sh. Sunny
was also interrogated and denied any transaction with the complainant. He also refused to give any statement. In absence of any documents related to the
alleged transactions, no Police case was made.
However, the contact number of the beat staff was provided to the
complainant and the concerned beat staff has also been directed to keep in
touch with the complainant.
3. The Action Taken Report of the Police was
sent to the complainant who vide his another complaint dated 3.2.2016
reiterated his allegations which was also referred to DCP, Central District
vide letter dated 9.2.2016. SHO,
Rajender Nagar informed that fresh complaint was identical to the earlier one
which was duly enquired and the report was submitted. Therefore, no separate police enquiry was
needed.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case,
particularly in light of the fact that there are no supporting documents in
connection with the alleged transactions.
The law enforcing agency has also indicated its inability to proceed
further in the absence of any evidence.
Therefore, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings in
the matter. The case is accordingly
closed.
4. Given under my hand and the seal of the Court
this 13th day of December, 2017.
(T.D. DHARIYAL)
Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
