Showing posts with label Transport Allowance for Persons with Disabilities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transport Allowance for Persons with Disabilities. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

Durgesh Mishra Vs. The Director, Directorate of Education | Case No. 2569/1024/2022/04/5412-5413 | Dated: 25-05-2022

 In the Court of the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundri Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the 
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 2569/1024/2022/04/5412-5413                 Dated: 25-05-2022

In the matter of:

Sh. Durgesh Mishra
Flat No.42, Krishna Apartment, 
Block BH(East), Shalimar Bagh, 
New Delhi-110088. ............Complainant

                                                      Versus

The Director
Directorate of Education,
Old Secretariat, Delhi-110054. ……......Respondent


ORDER

The complainant, a person with 70% locomotor disability and a TGT (English) in a school under Dte. of Education vide complaint received from the Office of Chief Commissioner of PwDs on 13.04.2022 (e-mail), under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act, alleged that he was not being paid the Transport Allowance (TA) at the double the normal rate as per Govt. of India Rules since his joining Dte. of Education and thus deprived of the right as a person with disability.  CCPD also forwarded the same complaint vide e-mail dated 18.04.2022 which was received by their department from an NGO Toshiyas, Bihar.

2. The matter was taken up with the respondent vide letter dated 19.04.2022 followed by reminder dated 04.05.2022. Head of the GBSS School, Shalamar Village on behalf of DOE vide letter dated 12.05.2022 replied that the complainant joined DOE on 27.08.2020 as TGT (English) under “General Category” through DSSSB.  On 26.12.2020, complainant applied to change his category from General to P.H. for which the file was forwarded before the Director of Education for change of category with the recommendation to consider the request of the complainant.  As per the rectification in the MIS online system of DOE, the category “PH/Ortho” was accepted by the department on 14.09.2021 and accordingly the benefit of double TA was released to the complainant w.e.f. 01.09.2021.  

3. The reply sent by the HOS, GBSS School, Shalamar Village was sent to the complainant vide this office letter dated 17.05.2022.  The complainant was not satisfied with the said reply.  The HOS was contacted on telephone and the issue was discussed at length and it was stressed that there is no fault of the complainant if the online system of the office of respondent approved the request of the complainant at a later date. 

4. After perusing the complaint, the reply submitted by the respondent and discussion with the HOS, it was observed that the complainant requested the respondent for change of category from “General” to “Ph-Ortho” on 26.12.2020 which was accepted by the respondent on 14.09.2021.  In view of this, it is recommended that the complainant be provided the benefit of double the Transport Allowance with effect from the date he informed/requested for change of category to “PH-Ortho”.

5. This court be informed of the action taken by the respondent within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of RPwD Act, 2016 i.e. 26.12.2020.  

6. Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 25th day of May, 2022. 


(Ranjan Mukherjee)
State Commissioner of Persons with Disabilities


Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Sat Narayan Vs. Managing Director, Delhi Transport Corporation | Case No. 600/1024/2018/11/1388-1389 | Dated: 19.03.2019




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 600/1024/2018/11/1388-1389                Dated: 19.03.2019

In the matter of:

Sh. Sat Narayan
H.No. 141/3, B-Block,
Gali No. 4, Dichaon Enclave,
Nangloi Road, Najafgarh,
New Delhi-110043                                                ................ Complainant

                                           Versus                          
Managing Director,
Delhi Transport Corporation,
DTC Headquarter,
I.P. Estate,
New Delhi-110002.                                               ………...…Respondent

Date of hearing:    13.03.2019

Present:      Sh. Sat Narayan, complainant in person.
                   Sh. Dhirendra Kumar, Depot Manager for respondent.

        
Order

The above named complainant, a person with 80% locomotor disability vide his complaint dated 26.11.2018 submitted that he was working as Assistant Fitter in DTC.  He is struggling to get the transport allowance at double the normal rate.  The Depot Manager has refused to pay transport allowance as per his entitlement.  He requested that he should be paid transport allowance as per his entitlement.  As the complainant had not enclosed his certificate of his disability, he was advised to do so vide letter dated 17.12.2018 which he submitted on 31.12.2018. 
2.       The matter was taken up with the respondent vide notice dated 03.01.2019 under the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’ with the direction to submit the version of the respondent within 15 days of the notice. 
3.       As there was no response, a hearing was schedule on 13.03.2019 vide notice dated 11.12.2018. In the meantime, the respondent vide letter dated 07.12.2019 submitted as under:
“Respected Sir,
I am in receipt of your show cause notice case No. 600/10242018/53 dated 03.01.2019 thereby action taken report on the complaint of above named employee of our depot.
In this connection, I would like to submit few lines for your sympathetic consideration please.
1.            That the above named complainant is working in our depot since July 2011 as a A/Fitter in the pay band of 5200 grade pay @ Rs. 2800.
2.            As per handicapped certificate issued from Civil Surgeon, Bhiwani (Haryana) he has been disabled since 07.11.2012 for which his entitlement for T.A. is made according to the Terms of Circular issued by Government of India vide OM No. 21(2)/200/EH(B) dated 29.08.2008 of Sixth Pay Commission and later on our DTC department issued circular vide Admi-1-7(42)/13/217 dated 22.03.17.
Accordingly as per terms and condition of the circular he has since been paid T.A. since 07.11.12 from the date he had been disabled, the details of paid amount are attached herewith as annexure “A” the copies of circular of 6th pay commission and 7th pay commission are also attached at Annexure “B” & “C” for your ready reference please.
In the end, I would say that no payment dues are pending from our side.
With warm regard.

Depot Manager
DTC.D.K. Depot N.Delhi”
          As per the statement enclosed with the reply, an over payment of Rs. 22,032/- has been made to the complainant which is to be recovered.
4.       During the hearing, the representative of the respondent reiterated the written submissions and added that the matter was examined and referred to DTC Head Quarter.  As per the advice/decision of the DTC (HQ), the due drawn statement was prepared.
5.       The complainant submitted that he does not understand the nuisances of the rules but as per the information gathered by him, the employees without disability of the same depot, i.e. DTC, Dichaon Kalan who were getting less pay than him as per Sixth Pay Commission, were being paid the transport allowance at the rate of Rs.1600/-, whereas he has been paid at the rate of Rs. 600/-.  He has submitted a copy of the list of 9 employees who were getting TA as per following table as on 26.10.2017:
“List of employees who are getting TA as on 26.10.2017
S.No.
Name of employee
Design
B.P.
D.A.
T/A
1.         
Sh. Kanwal Singh
T.T.C.
49000/-
1960/-
Rs.7424/-
2.         
Sh. Ranbir Singh
A.T.I.
49000/-
1960/-
Rs.7424/-
3.         
Sh. Rishi Parkash
A.T.I.
50500/-
2020/-
Rs.7424/-
4.         
Sh. Sukhbir Singh
Driver
28400/-
1136/-
Rs.7424/-
5.         
Sh. SatyaParkash
Driver
28400/-
1136/-
Rs.7424/-
6.         
Sh. Devinder Kumar
Cond.
26800/-
1072/-
Rs.7424/-
7.         
Sh. Sant Singh
Fitter
42800/-
1712/-
Rs. 2784/-
8.         
Sh. Ishwer Singh
A/fitter
42800/-
1712/-
Rs. 2784/-
9.         
Sh. Sat Narain
A/fitter
42800/-
1712/-
Rs. 2784/-
Note:   Basic Pay & Dearness allowance-As per VII pay Commission Transport Allowance-As per VIth Pay Commission”
6.       As per the complainant and as confirmed by the representatives of the respondent, the employees at serial no. 4 to 6 were getting less pay than the complainant, but were being paid TA at higher rate.
7.       It is observed that this Court had, before it the similar complaint of Sh. Mir Singh, ATI which was registered as case no 4/1659/2017-Wel./CD and 4/1702/2017-Wel./CD and disposed off vide order dated 20.09.2017.  The operative part of the order is as under:
“6.        In my view, the DTC’s circular dated 22.03.2013 which is the reproduction of the Department of expenditure, Ministry of Finance, OM 21(2)/2008-E-II(B) dated 29.08.2008, provides that an employee below the Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- who is in receipt of pay below Rs. 7440/- in a pay band, would be entitled to a Transport Allowance of Rs. 600+DA there on in A-1/A Cities.  Clause II of the said circular/OM provides that employees who draw grade pay below 4200/- but drawing the pay of Rs. 7440/- and above in a pay band would be entitled to a Transport Allowance of Rs. 1600+DA thereon in A-1/A Cities.  Since admittedly the complainant who is a person with locomotor disability, was drawing the pay of Rs. 9580/- i.e. above Rs. 7440/-, should have been paid the Transport Allowance at double the normal rate of Rs. 1600+DA thereon w.e.f February, 2009. 
7.         In view of the above, the respondent is advised re-examine the matter and pay the Transport Allowance to the complainant and other similarly placed employees with disabilities accordingly.  If the respondent still has any doubt about the interpretation of the OM dated 29.08.2008 of Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure and DTC’s circular dated 22.03.2013, the respondent may get the same clarified from the Finance Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi/Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance expeditiously and take action accordingly.  The claim of the complainant for promotion to the post of Transport Inspector against a reserved vacancy for the persons with disabilities be considered in accordance with the instructions of DOP&T vide their OM No. 36035/3/2004-Estt(Res) dated 29.12.2005 and action taken in the matter be submitted within 3 months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.”
8.       While the ratio of the above decision should be followed in this case, the relevant rule position is being reiterated to facilitate timely relief to the complainant. 
9.       As per Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, OM No 21 (2)/2008-E.II(B) dated 29.8.2008, all employees are entitled to transport allowance w.e.f. 01.09.2008 as below:

Employees drawing grade pay of
Rate of Transport allowance per month

In 13 cities classified as A-1/A earlier.
Other places
Grade pay of Rs. 5400 & above.
Rs.3200+DA thereon
Rs.1600+DA thereon
(i)        Grade pay of Rs.4200, Rs.4600 and Rs.4800
(ii)         Those drawing grade pay below Rs.4200 but drawing pay in the pay band equal to Rs. 7440 & above.
Rs.1600+DA thereon
Rs.800+DA thereon
Grade pay below 4200 and pay in the pay band below Rs. 7440.
Rs.600+DA thereon
Rs.400+DA thereon

10.     DTC has adopted the above OM and issued its own office circular no. Admin-I-7(42)/2013/217 dated 22.03.2013.  From the above circular, it is clear that employees who are in the grade pay of less than Rs.4,200/- and whose pay in their respective pay band is also below of Rs.7,440/-, are entitled to a transport allowance of Rs. 600/- p.m. plus DA thereon in A1/A cities.  Those employees who are in the grade pay of less than Rs.4,200/- but are drawing pay equal to Rs. 7440 and above in their respective pay band are entitled to a transport allowance of Rs. 1600/- p.m. plus DA thereon.  As per the copy of the payslip for the month of September, 2013 submitted by the respondent, the pay of the complainant was Rs.14,370/-.  The complainant was in the pay band of Rs. 5200-20200 with grade pay of Rs. 2800/- since July 2011 as per DTC’s letter dated 29.01.2019/07.02.2019.  It is not disputed that employees with disabilities are entitled to transport allowance at double the normal rate.  Therefore, as the pay of the complainant was admittedly more than Rs.7,440/- in the pay band on 07.11.2012, he was entitled to transport allowance at the rate of Rs.3,200/- p.m. plus DA thereon in accordance with clause 2 of the DTC’s circular no. Admin-I-7(42)/2013/217 dated 22.03.2013 with effect from 07.11.2012 which, according to the respondent is the date the complainant’s disability certificate was accepted.  It is also observed that some employees junior to the complainant were getting more transport allowance than him.  This calls for a thorough examination of the payments made to the employees towards transport allowance.  While DTC may take appropriate action on this, payment of transport allowance at double the normal rate to the complainant as per his entitlement should be paid on priority. 
11.     In light of the above discussion, it is recommended that the transport allowance at double the normal rate @ Rs.3,200/- per month plus DA thereon be calculated on priority and paid to the complainant from the date he was entitled to. 
12.     Action taken report on the above mentioned recommendation be submitted to this Court within three months from the date of receipt of this order as required under Section 81 of the Act.
13.     The complaint is disposed off.
14.     Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 19th day of March, 2019.     


(T.D. Dhariyal)
             State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
Encl.:  As above.

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Ajay Kumar vs. CMO, DTC | Case No. 4/1029/2015-Wel/cd/3659-60 | Dated: 02.01.2018


Case Summary:

Employment; Transport Allowance, Disability Certificate- Complainant with 60% hearing impairment alleged that DTC was not accepting his disability certificate, denying him benefit extended by Govt. to persons with disabilities. Subsequent to notice to the respondent to show cause, the respondent submitted that the competent authority had approved the transport allowance to the complainant.

Order / Judgement: 


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 4/1029/2015-Wel/cd/3659-60                   Dated: 02.01.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Ajay Kumar,
A.T.I,  T.No. 27665
DTC HQ, I.P. Estate,
New Delhi                                                                 ................ Petitioner

                                          Versus 

Chief Medical Officer,
Delhi Transport Corporation,
Banda Bahadur Marg,
I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110009                               ………...…Respondent


                                                      ORDER

          The above named complainant, a person with 60% hearing impairment filed a complaint dated 10.07.2015 and alleged that Delhi Transport Corporation was not accepting his disability certificate issued by Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and the same was being refused by the DTC Medical Board.  He was being denied all the benefits extended by Government to persons with disabilities.

2.      The complaint was taken up with the respondent who vide letter dated 16.11.2015 informed that Competent Authority had approved the benefit of transport allowance to the complainant w.e.f. 05.05.2015 to 04.05.2020 i.e. upto the date of his superannuation.  The said communication was sent to the complainant vide letter dated 29.02.2016 for his comments. 

3.      As there was no response from the complainant he was contacted on his mobile on 15.12.2017.  He informed that he has got all his benefits from the department.  He has now retired from the service.  In view of this the complaint is disposed off.

4.      Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 02nd day of January, 2018.     
                                                                            
                                     (T.D. Dhariyal)
                                     State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities