Saturday, June 9, 2018

Pradeep Kumar Vs. The Chairman, DSSSB | Case No. 155/1041/2018/03/7739-40 | Dated: 08.06.2018



In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]


Case No. 155/1041/2018/03/7739-40                         Dated: 08.06.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Pradeep Kumar
S/o Sh. Zile Singh
R/o 1569 Near Brahman Chopal
Pna Mamur Pur, Narela
Delhi-110040.                                                             .……Applicant

Versus

The Chairman
Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board
F-18, Institutional Area
Karkardooma,
Delhi-110092.                                                              ...…Respondent

Date of Hearing:    07.06.2018

Present:      Sh. Pradeep Kumar, applicant in person.
Sh. LR Garg, Member DSSSB on behalf of respondent.

         
ORDER

The above named complainant, a person with 90% Locomotor  disability vide his complaint dated 06.03.2018 submitted that DSSSB conducted the (Tier-I) examination for the post of Administrative Officer/Z.R.O. in Delhi Jal Board on 31.05.2015 after a gap of three years from the closing date of applications.  The result of Tier-I examination was declared on 28.07.2016.  But Tier-II examination had not been held.  He therefore submitted that the examination process should be completed within six months.
2.      The complaint was taken up with the respondent vide notice dated 13.03.2018 followed by a reminder dated 17.04.2018 and a hearing was held on 07.06.2018.
3.      During the hearing on 07.06.2018, the representative of the respondent submitted a report dated 06.06.2018 as per which the Tier-II examination for the post code 67/12 has already been conducted on 03.06.2018.  The complainant was issued an admit card and was also present in the examination. There was however, no discrimination against the complainant.
4.      The complainant confirmed that he has appeared in the Tier-II  examination on 03.06.2018.  He further stated that as Tier-II examination was not being held for long, he filed this complaint.  However, as the examination has already been held, he has no further grievance in this regard.  In light of this, the complaint is disposed of.
5.      Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 08th day of June, 2018.

(T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Ms. Harjeet Gambhir Vs. DCP Shahdra | Case No. 4/1699/2017-WEL/CD/ 7736-38 | Dated: 08.06.2018


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005,
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 4/1699/2017-WEL/CD/ 7736-38          Dated: 08.06.2018
In the matter of:

Ms. Harjeet Gambhir,
125, Pratap Khand, Vishwakarma Nagar,
Jhilmil, Shahdara,
Delhi – 110 095.                                                 ……….Complainant            

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Shahdara.
Delhi – 110 032.                                               …………Respondent


         

ORDER

      The above named complainant vide her complaint dated nil, presented before the State Commissioner on 21.08.2017, submitted that her husband expired and her only son, Aman Gambhir is a person with 40-70% mental illness (Schizophrenia).  Her neighbour, Sh. Ram Kishore and his family members residing at 123, Pratap Khand harass her son and also sometimes beat him up. She also submitted that the said persons have also threatened to kill Aman.  Her son was too scared even to come out of the house.  She further submitted that she had also filed a complaint earlier and she wants that her above mentioned neighbour and his family members do not harass them.   
  

2.   The complaint was taken up with the respondent under the Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016, hereinafter referred to as the Act,  vide notice dated 31.08.2017 bringing to the notice of the respondent the provisions under Sections 6, 7 and 89 to 92 of the Act.

3.   The respondent vide letter dated 3.10.2017 submitted as under:
“ an enquiry into the matter was got conducted through ACP/Vivek Vihar.  During enquiry, the statement of the complainant was recorded wherein she stated that her neighbour Ram Verma and his sons and daughter Rahul, Rohit and Anjali along with his wife Meena Verma used to threaten her son Aman and abused him.  Further she is wiling to keep them aside and do not want their interference.

During further enquiry, Ram Kishore and his family members were enquired wherein they stated that we are neighbours of Ms. Harjeet Gambhir whose only son Aman is mentally challenged and used to trouble them and in the same pretext his mother also trouble them.  She used to through the garbage in front of their house and disturb their sons and daughter.  Also, other neighbours of complainant, Naseem Ahmed and Parvez Khan stated that the same matter as stated by Ram Kishore Verma and his family members.  It is a dispute between both the neighbours and no cognizable offence is found to have occurred.  There is a possibility of breach of peace, preventive action vide DD No. 29 A dated 25.09.17 PS Vivek Vihar 107/50 Cr.PC is initiated made against both the parties”


4.   The complainant was contacted on telephone and informed about the contents of the report submitted by the respondent.  She informed that the situation has improved.  She however, submitted that she and her son should be provided necessary support by the police as and when required.


5.   It is reiterated that Section 6 of the Act inter-alia provides that the appropriate government shall take measures to protect persons with disabilities from being subjected to torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.  Section 7 of the said Act details specific measures for protecting from abuse, violence and exploitation and the action to be taken by a police officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know of any abuse, voidance or exploitation.  The said Section is reproduced below:-

“7. (1) The appropriate Government shall take measures to protect persons with disabilities from all forms of abuse, violence and exploitation and to prevent the same, shall—
(a) take cognizance of incidents of abuse, violence and exploitation and provide legal remedies available against such incidents;
(b) take steps for avoiding such incidents and prescribe the procedure for its reporting;
(c) take steps to rescue, protect and rehabilitate victims of such incidents; and
(d) create awareness and make available information among the public.
(2) Any person or registered organisation who or which has reason to believe that an act of abuse, violence or exploitation has been, or is being, or is likely to be committed against any person with disability, may give information about it to the Executive Magistrate within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such incidents occur.
(3) The Executive Magistrate on receipt of such information, shall take immediate steps to stop or prevent its occurrence, as the case may be, or pass such order as he deems fit for the protection of such person with disability including an order—
(a) to rescue the victim of such act, authorising the police or any organisation working for persons with disabilities to provide for the safe custody or rehabilitation of such person, or both, as the case may be;
(b) for providing protective custody to the person with disability, if such person so desires;
(c)  to provide maintenance to such person with disability.
(4) Any police officer who receives a complaint or otherwise comes to know of abuse, violence or exploitation towards any person with disability shall inform the aggrieved person of

(a) his or her right to apply for protection under sub-section (2) and the particulars of the Executive Magistrate having jurisdiction to provide assistance;
(b) the particulars of the nearest organisation or institution working for the rehabilitation of persons with disabilities;
(c) the right to free legal aid; and
(d) the right to file a complaint under the provisions of this Act or any other law dealing with such offence:
Provided that nothing in this section shall be construed in any manner as to relieve the police officer from his duty to proceed in accordance with law upon receipt of information as to the commission of a cognizable offence.
(5) If the Executive Magistrate finds that the alleged act or behaviour constitutes an offence under the Indian Penal Code, or under any other law for the time being in force, he may forward the complaint to that effect to the Judicial or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, having jurisdiction in the matter.”
6.   The Act also provides for offences and penalties and the relevant Sections are also reproduced below:-
“89Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this Act, or of any rule made thereunder shall for first contravention be punishable with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and for any subsequent contravention with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.

92. Whoever,—
(a) intentionally insults or intimidates with intent to humiliate a person with disability in any place within public view;
(b) assaults or uses force to any person with disability with intent to dishonour him or outrage the modesty of a woman with disability;
(c) having the actual charge or control over a person with disability voluntarily or knowingly denies food or fluids to him or her;
(d) being in a position to dominate the will of a child or woman with disability and uses that position to exploit her sexually;
(e) voluntarily injures, damages or interferes with the use of any limb or sense or any supporting device of a person with disability;
(f) performs, conducts or directs any medical procedure to be performed on a woman with disability which leads to or is likely to lead to termination of pregnancy without her express consent except in cases where medical procedure for termination of pregnancy is done in severe cases disability and with the opinion of a registered medical practitioner and also with the consent of the guardian of the woman with disability,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to five years and with fine.”

7.   Office of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi vide Circular No. 28/2017 dated 25.10.2017 has also brought to the notice of all concerned in Delhi Police the provisions of the Act relating to the duties of police officers and the provision for offences and punishments for contravention/violation of any provision of the Act and has directed all the DCsP to take necessary action to make all the I.O.s aware of the provisions of the Act and to ensure its effective implementation.

8.   In light of the provisions of the Act and the situation of the complainant and her son, the respondent is advised to ensure that Sh. Aman Gambhir is not harassed/threatened/teased by any person and his rights are not infringed.  It is also recommended to organise awareness and sensitisation programmes among the members of civil society, if necessary, in consultation with the Social Welfare Department/District Social Welfare Officer concerned, Govt. of NCT of Delhi.

9.   The complainant may contact the concerned Police Station for assistance as and when required, who are expected to take appropriate measures to ensure that atrocities are not inflicted by anyone on Sh. Aman Gambhir and his rights are not infringed.

10.  The complaint is disposed off.

11. Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 08th day of June, 2018.    


(T.D. Dhariyal)
State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


                  Copy to :


The Secretary (Social Welfare), Govt. of NCT of Delhi, GLNS Complex, Delhi Gate, New Delhi – 110002, for extending necessary support in organizing awareness and sensitization programmes.

Friday, June 8, 2018

Pradeep Kumar Vs. DSSSB | ase No. 282/1041/2018/05/7719-18 | Dated: 07.06.2018


In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016] 

Case No. 282/1041/2018/05/7719-18                   Dated:  07.06.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Pradeep Kumar
S/o Sh. Zile Singh
R/o 1569 Near Brahman Chopal
Pna Mamur Pur, Narela
Delhi-110040.                                                    ……Applicant

Versus

Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board
(Got of NCT of Delhi)
(Through its Secretary)
F-18, Institutional Area
Karkardooma,
Delhi-110092.                                                    …Respondent

         
Order

The above named complainant, a person with 90% Locomotor disability (right lower limb and right upper limb) vide his email dated 14.05.2018 addressed to Secretary, DSSSB with a copy to this Court requested to allow him his own scribe and 20 minutes compensatory time per hour of examination to write Tier-II examination for the post of ZRO/Administrative Officer to be held by DSSSB on 03.06.2018. He also filed an OA in the Hon’ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi seeking relief on the same issue.
2.         As the examination was to be held on 03.06.2018 (Sunday), this Court vide letter dated 31.05.2018 informed the respondent that as per para IV and para XI  of OM no. 16-110/2003-DD.III dated 26.02.2013 of Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, a candidate making use of scribe, should have the discretion of opting his own scribe and compensatory time of not less than 20 minutes per hour of examination respectively.  In view of a such clear guideline, it was recommended that the complainant be allowed his own scribe and 20 minutes compensatory time per hour of examination to be held on 03.06.2018.  The letter was also emailed to the parties. 
3.         Hon’ble Tribunal, while disposing off the MA no. 2518/2018, directed vide order dated 31.05.2018 that the applicant should approach the Chairman, DSSSB or any concerned functionary of DSSSB in view of the recommendation made by the State Commissioner.  This Court also ascertained from the complainant that he was allowed his own scribe and 20 minutes extra/compensatory time as per the instructions in the examination held on 03.06.2018.  In light of this, the complaint is disposed off.
4.         Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 07th day of June, 2018.

(T.D. Dhariyal)
           State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities


Friday, June 1, 2018

Rajiv Goel Vs. The Pr.Secretary, Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare | Case No. 228/1121/2018/05/7572-74 | Dated: 31.05.2018




In the Court of State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
National Capital Territory of Delhi
25- D, Mata Sundari Road, Near Guru Nanak Eye Centre, New Delhi-2
Phone-011-23216002-04, Telefax: 011-23216005, Email: comdis.delhi@nic.in
[Vested with powers of Civil Court under the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016]

Case No. 228/1121/2018/05/7572-74                                 Dated: 31.05.2018

In the matter of:

Sh. Rajiv Goel,
367, ASB, Paschim Vihar,
New Delhi-110063.                                                       .……… Complainant     

                                                      Versus

The Pr.Secretary,
Deptt. of Health & Family Welfare,
GNCT of Delhi,
9th Level, A-Wing, Delhi Secretariat,
New Delhi-110002.                                                         …...…Respondent

Date of hearing:     30.05.2018
Present                   Sh. Rajiv Goel, Complainant.
Dr. A Madhavi, Dy. Director(Disab.)

ORDER  

The above named complainant vide his email dated 06.05.2018 submitted that his son Master Kshitij Goel, who is 7.5 years old has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Specific Learning Disability(SLD).  He needs a disability certificate to get the benefit of reservation for admission to University.  He approached IHBAS for disability certificate. However, they refused to issue the disability certificate on the ground that as per the guidelines issued by Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD), Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment vide notification dated 04.01.2018, IHBAS is not competent to issue certificates for SLD. He further submitted that he has met officials at all levels in IHBAS and he has come to know that Govt. of NCT of Delhi has not authorized any hospital in Delhi for issuance of disability certificate for SLD. The guidelines for issuance of disability certificate for SLD mandate the presence of Pediatrician and Pediatric Neurologist as part of medical authority and IHBAS does not have Pediatrician or Pediatric Neurologist on its rolls and hence is unable to issue the certificates of disability for SLD.  

2.           The complainant requested to direct Govt. of NCT to notify hospitals as per provisions of the DEPwD,  Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment’s Notification dated 04.01.2018    and  also direct IHBAS to constitute a medical board for the purpose of issuing disability certificate without the presence of a Pediatrician or Pediatric Neurologist. 
  
3.           The complaint was taken up with the respondent under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2016 hereinafter referred to as the Act vide letter dated 08.05.2018 detailing therein the request  of this Court regarding designating certifying authorities for specified disabilities  including specific learning disability  vide letters dated 06.03.2018 and 24.04.2018 and decision in a meeting taken by the State Commissioner on 16.04.2018. As there was no response and the complainant vide his subsequent emails informed that he has not been able to get the disability certificate in respect of his son, a Show-Cause-Cum-Hearing Notice was issued on 24.05.2018. In the said notice, Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department (H&FW) was directed why the certifying authorities should not be designated in NCT of Delhi for all the specified disabilities in the Act by 29.05.2018. The respondent was also  directed to arrange to assess and issue the certificates of disability to all the eligible applicants; and if the same was not done by 29.05.2018, the respondent was directed to appear on 30.05.2018 at 11.30 AM.

4.           While the complainant and Dr. A. Madhavi, Dy.Director(Disb.), representing Secretary, Social Welfare Department, to whom the copy of the Notice dated 24.05.2018 also emailed appeared, the respondent i.e. the Health & Family Welfare Deptt. (H&FW) neither submitted any status nor did anyone appear to represent Pr. Secretary(H&FW). Apparently,  appropriate action has not been taken by the H&FW Department to ensure assessment and certification of the newly included specified disabilities despite the fact that the issue of designating certifying authorities had been taken up with that  Department and other concerned authorities ever since the Guidelines for assessment of specified disabilities were notified by the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Govt. of India on 04.01.2018. 

5.      No response/ATR in this case has been received from the respondent.  However, Health and Family Welfare Department vide their letter dated 14.03.2018 in response to letter dated 07.02.2018 Department of Social Welfare requested Directorate General Health Services (DGHS), GNCT of Delhi to issue instructions to all medical institutions responsible for grant of certificate of disability to follow the notified guidelines for evaluation and certification of various categories of specified disabilities.  DGHS was also requested to conduct workshops to train the medical authorities about the new guidelines to facilitate smooth issuance of certificates of disability in a time bound manner. The department also requested DGHS to implement the recommendation vide their letter dated 11.05.2018 in the meeting taken by State Commissioner on 16.04.2018 and to issue an advisory/directions to all Govt. hospitals that issue disability certificate in the present to continue issuing the disability certificates in accordance with the guidelines notified by Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities on 04.01.2018 in respect of all the disabilities specified in RPwD Act, 2016.  An ATR was also sought to be furnished to this Court within three days under intimation to Health and Family Welfare Department.  However, no report has so far been received.

6.      In another letter dated 22.05.2018, Health and Family Welfare Department in case no. 139/1121/2018/03, has informed this Court, “that as per new RPwD Act, 2016, the Hospitals have not been notified by the Delhi Government till yet as the Draft Delhi State Rules under RPwD Act, 2016 has not been finalized by Social Welfare Department, GNCT of Delhi. However, in this regard this office has already requested the DGHS to issue necessary instructions to all medical institutions responsible for grant of certificate of disability to follow the notified guidelines of Govt. of India for RPwD Act, 2016 for evaluation and certification of various categories of specified disabilities vide this office letter dated 14.03.2018”.  In response, this Court vide letter no. 139/1121/2018/03/7552 dated 30.05.2018 has informed the respondent that as per Section 57 of the Act, designation of certifying authority for assessment and certification of disability  is not dependent on Delhi RPwD Rules.  The respondent has therefore been requested to designate the certifying authorities so that persons with disabilities are assessed and certified as per the guidelines issued by Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities vide notification dated 04.01.2018.

7.           Dr. A. Madhavi,Dy.Director (Disb.), informed that the draft Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules have been notified in the Delhi’s e-Gazette inviting suggestions / objections from the people within a period of 30 days.  The said draft  Rules which were circulated to all the Departments including the Health and Family Welfare Department,  also provide that the H&FW shall designate the certifying authorities and notify their jurisdiction.  Thereafter the rules will be finalized and notified with the approval of Hon’ble Lt. Governor. However, absence of Rules does not prohibit the Department of Health and Family Welfare from designating the certifying authorities. As regards the jurisdiction, the notification dated 12.02.2014 for the purpose stands.  She further submitted that it is not possible for the Social Welfare Department to identify the certifying authorities in the existing hospitals in NCT of Delhi.  This can be done only by the H&FW Department.    

8.           Reiterating his written submissions, the complainant submitted that admissions in the Universities in Delhi are going to  start from 18th June, 2018 and the students with disabilities seeking admission against the 5% reserved seats for them must have a disability certificate as per the requirement of the concerned universities.  His son,  Master Kshitij Goel, who has been diagnosed with Specific Learning Disability has  passed class 12th exam  and he needs a valid disability certificate to be able to apply for admission against the reserved seats. 

9.           It may be recalled that while disposing off case No. 106/1121/2018/02  filed by Ms. Simmi Copra, vide Para 14 of the Order dated 19.03.2018, it was  recommended that  Pr.Secretary Health and Family Welfare should take immediate action and issue detailed guidelines and directives on the process of assessing and issuing  disability certificates by various hospitals / certifying authorities in the NCT  of Delhi so that persons with disabilities and their family members are able to get the disability certificates within the time frame prescribed in the Rules and they are not harassed.  It was specifically advised  that it should be done on top priority as the admissions to schools in Delhi will also commence and many young people with disabilities would approach the hospitals for certificates of disability.

10.         It may be also be recalled that anticipating the difficulties and perceived complications, Office of State Commissioner convened a meeting with the officers of Health and Family Welfare Department, Department of Social Welfare and all the existing designated hospitals for certification of various disabilities on 16.04.2018.  In that meeting,  one of the decisions was  that  as the existing notifications dated 12.02.2014  and 10.09.2014 of Deptt. of Social Welfare, Govt. of NCT of Delhi stand,  Health and Family Welfare  Department will issue a circular to all the concerned hospitals / certifying authorities by 30.04.2018 so that  people with disabilities including the newly included ones are assessed and certified. This essentially required identification of the certifying authorities / specialists and the hospitals that have the specialists and can assess and certify the newly included specified disabilities. 

11.         However,  it appears from the letters dated 14.03.2018 and  11.05.2018 of  Health and Family Welfare  Department  and 22.05.2018 referred to in Para 5&6  that the appropriate certifying authorities  and the hospitals for assessment and certification of specific learning disability and other newly included specified disabilities have not been identified and designated.  Apparently,  the concerned hospitals are not able to assess  and issue disability certificates.

12.         Section 57 of the Act provides as under:
“57. (1) The appropriate Government shall designate persons, having requisite qualifications and experience, as certifying authorities, who shall be competent to issue the certificate of disability.
 (2) The appropriate Government shall also notify the jurisdiction within which and the terms and conditions subject to which, the certifying authority shall perform its certification functions”.

Section 101 of the  Act also does not require the State Govt. to frame the rules for implementation of Section 57 of the Act. Thus, designation of certifying authorities is not dependent on notification of Delhi Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules.  Health and Family Welfare Department could therefore have designated the certifying authorities immediately after notification dated 04.01.2018 of the Department of Empowerment of Persons With Disabilities.

13.         The line of action seems  abundantly clear to me and  therefore, it is recommended that the Health and Family Welfare Deptt., GNCT of Delhi should immediately identify the certifying  authorities / specialists in different hospitals as notified vide notifications dated 12.02.2014 and 10.09.2014 keeping in view the availability of specialists by 08.06.2018 indicating their jurisdiction  and issue instructions to the concerned certifying authorities to ensure that  all the applicants for certification are assessed and if eligible, be issued certificates of disability by 15.06.2018 so that they are in possession of the certificates of disability before applying for admission to the universities / colleges. A meeting by Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department and DGHS with the Heads of all the concerned hospitals in NCT of Delhi including those under the Central Government and local authorities and Secretary, Department of Social Welfare may facilitate resolution of the issue. This should be done on top priority as the eligible persons with newly included specified disabilities will be deprived of their right to seek admission against the reserved seats for persons with benchmark disabilities for the second academic year as the Act had been brought into effect with effect from 19.04.2017, albeit without putting in place the guidelines until 04.01.2018 and due to not  designating the certifying authorities in  NCT of Delhi till date. This recommendation is being made to protect the rights of  eligible persons with disabilities to admission against reserved seats for them under Section 32 of the Act.

14.           An Action Taken Report  shall be submitted to this Court by 15.06.2018.  If the respondent  decides not to accept the recommendation, the reasons for non-acceptance of the recommendation be conveyed to this court as required under Section 81 of the Act.

15.         The complaint is disposed off accordingly.

16.         Given under my hand and the seal of the Court this 31th   day of May, 2018.                                               

                                                                                       (T.D. Dhariyal )
                      State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities

Copy to:- The Secretary(Social Welfare), Deptt. of Social Welfare, GLNS Complex , Delhi Gate, New Delhi for information.